^^^^
f
Wed, 10/15/2014 - 17:55
#152
^
Wed, 10/15/2014 - 18:04
#153
@ Bleyken, Im not acting like
@ Bleyken, Im not acting like a five year old, Im letting YOU and other forum readers know, Im not goin without a fight. I didnt AT during the tournament point blank period. Your the one acting immature, say what you like but its not just me who thinks so. Your hosting a tournament as a so called "judge". How you have ANY responsibility is beyond my understanding. Your biased, you look out for people you know, you dish out false accusations and claim them to be fact. You sit here and defend yourself by admitting you dont know, yet act like you do. Actions speak louder than words kid, I hope you enjoy my free money I paid to get in the tourney. Just my opinion, but your no good. The only thing thats gonna give me some satisfaction in all this is if you accept my challenge to a personal 1v1, with a personal bet between the 2 of us of 100kcr, and I beat you recording me killing you with the same combo I killed your "AT crying" guild member, while I record myself using no AT. Loser.
Wed, 10/15/2014 - 21:19
#154
Hmmmmm.
Sprunket used the quote satire method (but correctly on the right person). Thanks.
I was thinking of it, but I feel players who host the tournament can run it however they please because entering is sort of an oath to follow all rules and listen to the judgement of the judges or hosts. However, hosting a public tournament which involves taking money from participants means in return the judges are to judge correctly and honestly. (If the tourney was free then there should be less uproar at the calling, but I believe the slander was what crossed the line of respect as well as the money.)
It's all about respect.
It seem shots have been fired and a duel has been proposed. No clue how things will turn out now . . . .
*On a side note since there are not 64 players, is the prize still 1 million crowns?
Thu, 10/16/2014 - 00:28
#155
@Sprunket
Don't forget the part where judges are allowed to participate and have the right to disqualify their opponents!
Thu, 10/16/2014 - 01:48
#156
@krakob
Unless you record the
@krakob
Unless you record the matches yourself :D
@judges
If the guy is willing to record i don't see a reason to not give him a rematch. Unless the guy who was supposed to 1v1 him strongly objects(which would kind of imply that he's scared of losing or something rite ?)
@everybody
Guys, you really can't expect the judges to observe a dodgy move from a person who's known to AT quite often(assuming this is the case as it has been mentioned in the post a lot) and then just pass it along as it was nothing. That's like putting ezho in this tournament and then observe him hit every single brandish hit he ever throws and being like : oh he's not ATing.
Thu, 10/16/2014 - 02:39
#157
@Alucard I accept the 1v1 with the bet.
Also I didn't take part making this tournament and I didn't receive any money from the participants.
Yes, the prize is still 1m cr, so Darkcub is like giving money, not receiving.
@Drdovis If the guy is willing to record i don't see a reason to not give him a rematch. Unless the guy who was supposed to 1v1 him strongly objects(which would kind of imply that he's scared of losing or something rite ?)
I understand that you see a re-match like a cool solution, but if the rule says: ''No AT'', for us, Alucard broke the rules, and I don't see a reason to let him participate again in this tournament. I hope Alucard will calm down and be quiet after the incoming 1v1.
Thu, 10/16/2014 - 10:39
#158
If we give Allesio a rematch when another players uses AT he could ask for a rematch and we would have to give him it to not be unfair.
We must set an example.
@Allesio Bleyken hasn't decided anything alone, WE ALL decided it and you shouldn't call Muffin "at crying".
Thu, 10/16/2014 - 11:54
#159
@Drdovis
The problem with the previous ATing part and comparing it to ezho doesnt make sense. In real life maybe it's reasonable to believe criminals are potential multiple offenders, but this is nowhere near similar. Not to mention the rest of Alucard's hits were not AT, so yeah. Also, Ezho, like anyone else, is capable of not using AT (I believe in the past he sometimes didnt use AT?). Apparently he just enjoys using it though.
@whoever
Honestly, no one should assume people will bring in AT just because they use it before. I swear if a player like Darkcub (apparently known for AT like apparently Alucard is or something, idk) lands a hit similiar to Alucard's and then is not disqualified, all hell will break loose.
I believe Contri is reasonable enough for the calling considering he forfeited when he breached the rules (well kinda it was more like a small mistake in the number of matches and idk how much Contri cared about winning.)
Once again this is more about the slandering and will be settled personally between Bleyken and Alucard. Good day everyone.
In conclusion, if you want a tournament to work the way you want, host one yourself, and try to be nice or at least neutral to others ._.
Thu, 10/16/2014 - 16:04
#160
I dont want a rematch in the
I dont want a rematch in the tournament, I felt like it was understandable to be disqualified for suspected AT. I was salty over it but it is what it is, not my tournament so I cant be too mad. What ticked me off was Bleyken's response to the situation and condemning me an AT user in the tourney and in rld... like really dude, when tf have we EVER been in the same rld game... Im glad you accepted, win or lose, I'll feel better after I smack you in the face with my ff. @Contri I was a little tipsy when I said Muffin was an "AT cryer" I apologize
Thu, 10/16/2014 - 23:25
#161
@Alucard
@ Bleyken, Im not acting like a five year old.
Sure you aren't.
I beat you recording me killing you with the same combo I killed your "AT crying" guild member, while I record myself using no AT. Loser.
I'll feel better after I smack you in the face with my ff.
And you shouldn't talk too much before the 1v1
Fri, 10/17/2014 - 05:09
#162
why Im not being an arrogant
why Im not being an arrogant fool like you, you forgot, ""Win or lose", I'll feel better after I smack you with ff" ...
Fri, 10/17/2014 - 05:57
#163
I wish you good luck, mate.
Fri, 10/17/2014 - 07:30
#164
So when's this thing even
So when's this thing even going to be on ? I want to see it cuz it's drama and drama sounds fun.
Fri, 10/17/2014 - 07:33
#165
@Drdovis
I'd expect it to be done sometime in late 2015 - early 2016. Most of the drama is here, I think.
Fri, 10/17/2014 - 07:43
#166
Fri, 10/17/2014 - 12:26
#167
@Krakob
WAIT!!!
You mean I could have paid 20k, entered the tourny AND as a judge, instantly disqualified myself for dodgey AT usage, Then rage about it here calling myself a "talentless, AT using, yellow bellied stinking nuub" while also shouting back "Where's yer bloody proof you short sighted dictator of unclear and obscure regulations . . . . . . WHERE. . . .IS. . .YOUR. . .PROOOOOOOF!!!!. . . . . . . . . . . .Thats what I thought. . . . Do you even AT brah?!"
. . . . . . . .oppertunity lost :(
Fri, 10/17/2014 - 15:42
#168
I rate this drama a 5/10 at best on IMDb... Whoever wrote the script sucks.
Fri, 10/17/2014 - 20:43
#169
↓
Hrm. My first 2 bullet points are relevant. Bias judges and AT predictions before the entire disagreement went down.
I watched one of the matches (contri vs vino-rosso).
From my knowledge of how AT functions, Vino-Rosso should have been disqualified as well. Additionally, all of the matches should have been voided (including the AT DQ one) for spectator involvement. Both attacks and blocked attacks from the crowd were involved.
New strategy for anyone still in the competition. Use spectators as meat shields from gun attacks. It isn't against the rules, so go ahead and use it to your advantage. The judges do not disqualify contri or vino-rosso for using the crowd to their advantage. GG.
Sat, 10/18/2014 - 00:41
#170
We didn't detect AT in Vino-Rosso, comboing all the time doesn't mean anything, and I know that he ATs in rld
Sat, 10/18/2014 - 06:50
#171
where is salt when you need him
lol @ the guy still laughing abt sports couches
lol @bleyjob for being ugly
lol @allessio for getting kicked from the tourney bc he gave them a competition
lol @whim for being sexy
lol @contri bc he sucks
lol @dark bc dark is cool c:
lol @ the people standing up for allessio since it was pointless(you have bleyjob, contri, and dark judging. you REALLY think you can get what you want from them? *tells rete to put something funny here*
Sat, 10/18/2014 - 07:53
#172
u suck more
Sun, 10/19/2014 - 06:10
#173
t(._. ) t( ._.)
contri don't make me pull it out
Tue, 10/21/2014 - 23:25
#174
What was that about sports couches again? 😂
Wed, 10/22/2014 - 14:11
#175
And 640,000cr down the drain.
Wed, 10/22/2014 - 15:40
#176
i'm not sure why anyone's surprised/whining/upset. i can't think of a single tournament that was finished where darkcub, contri, or feller were involved in any capacity, even as sponsors. so aside from chalking another tally in the ever-growing list of things that are more of the same when it comes to SK as a whole, there's nothing new about this.
i'm even seeing the same exact arguments that were in other tournament threads: "bawww you AT" "no u" "no U", lather rinse repeat ad nauseum. i'm sure everyone here would be fine with debating the issues until we're blue in the face, but at the end of the day, if you can't play the game enough to enjoy it for what it is, then you're in the wrong forum subsection.
in regards to the bits and pieces i skimmed about "detecting AT" - i can't be bothered to scroll up to see who actually said it, but i happened to have the perfect thought regarding that, as well as a pretty nice response. and since the burden of proof actually falls on whoever made that assertion about being able to reliably say who uses AT versus who doesn't, ball's in your court.
Thu, 10/23/2014 - 10:30
#177
We already finished 4 tournaments where the winners received their prizes. So don't talk that much and just wait.
Wed, 10/29/2014 - 21:18
#178
.
Ooops wrong forum my apologies
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Is it too late to enter the:
"Lockdown (where we will require no evidence but will still call you a noob with no skill if we susect you are a filthy filthy AT user (spits on the ground) and will throw around accusations like confetti even if we are not 100% sure. And instead of admitting the system or the judges might be flawed, we will base our decision on past games that have nothing to do with the game we are judging which causes people to question our bias) Championship 2014 with the Price of 1,000,000 Crowns for the winner"
It is!
Damn thats a shame, because that tourny sounded like it was really well thought out and structured. . . . . .and . . . . did I mention really well thought out?