From what I hear, you're going in T3 LD with two star equipment.

Just implement a Lockdown where everyone is handed Ancient Plate, Sudaruskas, 2x Pentas, and Iron Slugs.

"what?

did you even read that? or did you just go full [slash]?"

Of course I read it, silly. I even responded according to what you originally posted, which was something like:
"So, when I play lockdown, in tier 2, there is ALWAYS someone on there I have no chance of beating, I mean I hit these guys like 20 times and nothing, they hit me once and I die, They always seem to have 3 or 4 star equipment too, which to me seems unfair, as someone just entering tier 2 would have no hope of defeating that, and if you can't get past them, you can't score points. My suggestion is that there should be a tier between two and three, or that lockdown itself should be done with set equipment, I thought a different set for each class or something. otherwise you have people who should really be in tier 3 playing all the time to farm cr and that to me is just cheating the game"

Note that the bold parts are what I've filled in from memory. The rest of it is your post as it was when I began writing this response. Back to the topic at hand.

Don't go calling me a [slash] because you claimed that people wearing 4* equipment were killing you in T2 Lockdown. Not only is that offensive to me, it's offensive to people who have disabilities. Furthermore, it seems to me that in fact you did not read what I posted. Here, let me lay this all out flat for you.

"If you have even one piece of 4* equipment, you'll end up in T3 Lockdown. Nice try, buddy."
In your original post, you were whining that people in 4* equipment were killing you in T2 Lockdown. Here, I point out the fact that a single piece of 4* equipment will force you to play in T3 Lockdown, making it impossible for a person wearing 4* equipment to have killed you in T2 Lockdown. "Nice try, buddy" was my way of telling you that your argument is invalid, and that you should think about what you're saying before you say it.

"Unless you were using a Proto Sword or something (and even then), I'm pretty sure it's not possible to have hit the person 20 times without them dying. Nice try, buddy."
In your original post, you were whining that hitting someone 20 times would not do anything to them, and then they would hit you once, resulting in your death. Here, I point out that it's virtually impossible for you to hit someone 20 times and not do enough damage to kill them. "Nice try, buddy" was my way of telling you that your argument is invalid, and that you should think about what you're saying before you say it.

"Search bar! There's probably at least ten other threads about balancing Lockdown, and I have a good feeling that most of them have more substance and less complaint than yours. Just saying."
In your original post, you suggested that Lockdown be restricted such that each class uses a specific set of equipment. This suggestion is one of many that I've seen in my time on the Suggestions Forum, and I provided you with a link to a different idea. I then mentioned that other people who have suggested a more balanced Lockdown have done it in a more substantial, mature manner.

"Lockdown isn't just about killing things. Sometimes a skilled Recon will focus almost entirely on capturing points, which is how you win Lockdown. You don't win Lockdown by killing things, but doing so will usually help in capturing points."
This is me giving you advice in how to play Lockdown. I may not be the best Lockdown player, but I feel like this is a fairly simple concept to grasp.

Feel like spewing more crap, smart one? Try me.

And, the smack down from Manalicious. That's the match, ladies and gentlemen, I would suggest getting yourselves from this thread before the raging starts.

OP you are delicious meatball.

I present you with a trophy in your likeness for your outstanding accomplishments in being a meatball.

"nothing says butthurt like walls of text, tl;dr"

Walls of text are how things get done around here. Whining is how to be barred out by the community. You are whining. Whining is for wimps. Wimps are fodder. Fodder is what cattle eat. Cattle digest this fodder and turn it into feces. You are cattle feces. Your arguments and existence in this forum are invalid.

"Whine whine. Mommy, Luguiru is being a stinky meanie."

Your tears quench my thirst for vanquishing cowardice.

Except that the wall of text in question has no insults other than the ones quoted off the OP.
:double facepalm:
Mana is acting very mature.

Also: Hah! An admin finally posted on a thread made in the suggestions forum!

Made my day.

/ignoring everything else and the OP

Wow. I just read the above post and all I have to say is...

Epic Fail.

/facepalm

An alternative way would be a ranking system. Top players get matched with top players, newbies with newbies, etc.

But the playerbase may not be big enough.

Bahahaha, my entire paragraph just got edited. I should make another...

Well, your idea got endorsed by Blandaxt, which means it is no longer valid. Sorry, Juances.