What is best to use?
Vog Cub Set with Shadow Max!
Or
Snarby Set with Fire Max ?
To run FSC ?
And for Vana?
Same question for this shields:
Grey Owlite Shield – shadow Max
Or
Crest of Almire – Elemental Max?
What is best to use?
Vog Cub Set with Shadow Max!
Or
Snarby Set with Fire Max ?
To run FSC ?
And for Vana?
Same question for this shields:
Grey Owlite Shield – shadow Max
Or
Crest of Almire – Elemental Max?
I'd choose Snarby Fire max cause shadow & elemental & piercing uv's don't really do much. I'd also choose Coa elemental max
Learn to use Swiftstrike Buckler.
You will love it.
You will never touch any other shield again.
Swiftstrike >GoS/CoA
If I am correct, most of the monsters in FSC deal shadow damage and it is more likely that you will get hit by them rather than getting lit on fire. I think the only monsters that deal elemental in FSC are the gun puppies which there isn't much of (someone correct me if I'm wrong).
-Unif
Snaby stops way more shadow damage from zombies than max shadow vog cub set; you take 4 - 3 bars with snarby, 7 - 8 with vog cub. Elemental threat in FSC is minimal (lava tiles, fire puppy, vanaduke fireballs and mask phase bullets), one you have enough experience doing fsc you wont need elemental defence, then using snarby is nice because of zombie's jump, or a teammate push them towards you, etc; also having damage bonus very high is very desirable. Vog cub is cheaper, while snarby you have to get 2 max fire uvs (+11k ce / each wolver piece) and craft them at the Sanctuary, if you can afford that, go for it.
As for the shields, depends on what is your biggest problem, lava or zombies. Crest of Almire can take more zombie hits than Owlite, but would break faster with lava or mask bullets; Versus Vanaduke's mace and Trojans sword, both shields do similiar. Once you have played FSC enough, you should try using Switftstrike or Barbarous Thorn Shield.
Anwyays, since zombies dont appear to deal pure shadow, woudlnt it be better to have a Normal Max! on Vog?
Vog Shadow Max! would be better than snarby Fire Max! in FSC ignoring the sword bonuses (assuming you run opposite trinkets or something).
reasons:
1) Most sources of fire also do elemental damage. So, while snarby would prevent a long burn, you'll take more damage overall with no elemental resistance.
2) Double Max Shadow should put shadow protection at a similar level as a single piece of snarby. Decent protection, and what I currently run with.
3) Vana fight deals a lot more elemental damage than shadow damage (fire orbs and shadow fire, vs 8 zombies)
For shields, flip a coin. I think you're best off buying both and not worrying about the UVs on them. Take whichever one defends against your bigger problem (zombies vs fire traps). Personally I think CoA is better since you shouldn't be walking into stationary traps. As for use outside of Vana, having both is more important than having one with a UV, since devilites and howlitzers don't mix with elemental dealing monsters that often.
Snarby fire max. More of a bonus over all.
@Bopp
Yeah, FSC elemental traps hurt me so much (many lag here in Brasil). Zombies aren't a problem for me.
@Alynn
I have lag, and I need a STRONG shield to protect me....
@Juances
Zombies are not a problem for me, only shadow fire and fire traps ... so I think i'll go with Vog Cub.
(Nice work posting in English and Spanish Language Forums !)
@Nordlead
You say everithing i need, thx! I'll carry CoA, so....
@Fehzor
Because my lag, I am a very deffensive player...so is not a bonus question.
Thanks so much for your replies!
Double Max Shadow should put shadow protection at a similar level as a single piece of snarby.
Nope, 1 piece of snarby gives like 40% more shadow defense than a double max shadow uv.
O u got lag.
I guess Swiftstrike isnt good then
What do you think of a mix?
Snarby Cap - Fire Max(High, maybe?) + Vog Cub Coat - Shadow Max
Still work?
If zombies aren't a problem, but the fire traps are, then Vog fire max and vog shadow max are my advice. Also, GOS normal and elemental max would be my suggestion.
If zombies aren't a problem, but the fire traps are
at least you didn't say that he needs pierce defense... sigh.
could be wrong... but I pointed it out anyway. I read somewhere people analysis the status effect resistance capped at 10 points. (too lazy to dig up old posts) It will stay at 10 points resistance even if you have more. 8 points is a mark where you are immune to minor status. There is no immune against moderate and strong status effect.
low = 1, med = 2, high = 3, very high = 4, ultra = 5, max = 6, a piece of armor with full status resistance (ex: vog) = 5
So having like 1 fire max and 2 vog set = 6 + 5 + 5 = 16 which is too much ;x
I'm pretty sure it's two Vog (Or any 'max' fire pieces) + Med Derpules.
@ Poopsie
You're mixing the weapon and armor levels. Weapons have the 6 levels you describe. Armor only has 4 levels (Low=1, Medium, High, Max=4). A Maximum Fire UV will give you the same amount of fire resist as one piece of Vog.
Well, he did informed you everything you need to know about the 2 different sets. However, you can also combine them or mixed them!
Like me, I have Snarbolax Cap with max Fire and a Vog Cub coat with Normal max and i think i have pretty good defense on it. But if you really want to go for a set, i suggest you go to Snarbolax as it has more defense against zombies. =)
Full Mad Bomber beats everything.
But between those two, I'd take the Snarby, I get hit more by annoying lucky Slags (with their dang ninja leap) than tripping over Shadow Fire.
vog for boss stage, snarby for the lvls before boss. which stage do u take most dmg on?
I don't know, but the wiki page "Abilities" suggests that a Snarbolax set with fire Maximum! would have just as much fire protection as a Vog Cub set, whereas a Vog Cub set with shadow Maximum! would have maybe 40% as much shadow protection as a Snarbolax set. Seeing how fire protection (and even elemental protection) is more important in FSC than shadow protection is, I'd go with the Vog Cub choice.
I have an even less-firm opinion about the shields. Well, cheers.