Forums › English Language Forums › General › Suggestions

Search

seperate lower and upper face accessories (eye and mouth)

8 replies [Last post]
Sun, 10/28/2012 - 21:19
Knightgoddess

I suggest a seperation of the upper and lower face acessories. I was very sad that I could not wear a dapper combo and fancy goggles at the same time. It could act as a crown sink because people would buy more accessories and have even more endless accessory options.

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 02:00
#1
Severage's picture
Severage
@Knightgoddess:

Both are face (front) accessories.

I wouldn't be surprised if some of the bulkier goggles would clip with Scarves or something of that nature. If there isn't any clipping, I don't see why not. But I imagine there likely is.

~Sev

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 07:38
#2
Aureate's picture
Aureate
Processing Thoughts of You Always

@Sev: I'm pretty sure scarves are back accessories, so technically you could have moustaches along with pipes in the current system.
@OP: Sure, why not. I think there was a thread like this before, but unfortunately it didn't seem to get noticed.

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 07:41
#3
Dukeplatypus's picture
Dukeplatypus
@Aureate

There have been several threads like this before, and a few of them received a fair amount of notice.

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 08:28
#4
Alpha-Stevo's picture
Alpha-Stevo
Already suggested before,

Already suggested before, WITH picture proof provided by the lovely and fantastically manly Alphastevo.

THANK YOU ALPHASTEVO you magnificent stallion.

...

YEAH.

No one's gonna link it?

No one

No one's gonna

FINE I'll be the big man here.

http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/65809

COMPLETE with picture examples of all front accessories with all "lower face" accessories.

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 10:32
#5
Severage's picture
Severage
Oh.

I didn't remember a scarf was a back face accessory :P

My mistake.

~Sev

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 11:09
#6
Aureate's picture
Aureate
Processing Thoughts of You Always

@Duke: They didn't get noticed and implemented by the devs is what I meant. :B
I'm not entirely sure why, though. Nobody really came up with a decent reason to not have the slots separate other than something along the lines of clipping fears, all of which got assuaged. Oh yeah, and somebody being a jerk by saying we were greedy for wanting one accessory slot split into two.

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 19:26
#7
Alpha-Stevo's picture
Alpha-Stevo
@Aureate

Even if one accessory slot splitting into two DID happen before, with the advent of Armor Backs turning into Armor Back and Armor Rear.

And we still don't have faux-butts for our knights, only wimpy little tails.

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 20:33
#8
Thimol's picture
Thimol
-----

mouth

oh no no no no
NOOO

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system