Forums › English Language Forums › General › Suggestions

Search

New Sets, Sloom Armor, Dragon Blade/Sheild, and ''Unlucky'' Driver

19 replies [Last post]
Sat, 09/07/2013 - 21:38
Terrty's picture
Terrty

Youve read the title and imeadiately thought this was a bad suggestion so i just wanna say if your reading this thank you for your time. Now then, to the point. Ive noticed theres been a lack of weapon armor based patches in a while, well, ever xD, so heres a few. Sloom Set would have a helm and armor, each providing piercing defense, sleep defense [more detail on why and yes, i am aware regular jelly has sleep defense [also a sloom is a jelly creature that causes sleep]] also dmg bonus wolvers med on each[self explanitory]. It would just be another 5* upgrade for jelly. Dragon blade would be a DA/GF looking blade with the shape of a drakon at the handle with they eye red. It would be only obtainable by defeating lord vanduke on elite [ basicly on elite when you defeat theres a 30 percent chance of dropping from a box] it would have fair chance of causing strong fire [more deteal on when it can cause fire later]. It deals elemental dmg and the speed is that of DA/GF. Dragon sheild is the shap of ultimate drakon[that of has meteoric firebolt] it defends from elemental and fire shock stats. It offers asi everything low at lvl 5 and med at lvl 10. The ''Unlucky'' Driver is basicly an Umbra Driver with the curse status, Nithing needs to really be explained accept it can only be optained by defesting darkfire vana. Same chances of dropping as Dragon Blade. I put a lot of time and thought into this. However, just post what you think, any flaws, or suggestions to make it better.

Sat, 09/07/2013 - 23:14
#1
Khamsin's picture
Khamsin
Dragon Blade = Fang of Vog?

Dragon Blade = Fang of Vog?

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 05:15
#2
Little-Juances's picture
Little-Juances

http://wiki.spiralknights.com/Dragon_Scale_Shield

"But my shield is Dragon Shield without the 'Scale'!11!!"

Too unoriginal.

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 06:13
#3
Waffleconecake's picture
Waffleconecake
these are all bad. Please stop.

30% chance for a fresking free 5 star sword per box?!
The hell makes you think that is smart? You are going to flood the market with free swords! They will be cheaper then freakind brandishes with a med UV.

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 10:29
#4
Terrty's picture
Terrty
@juances yes its dragon scale

@juances yes its dragon scale sheild but shaped like a dragon and with asi swords med

@waffle dude its 30 for all boxes as a whole not per box, if it was per box youd have over 100 percent chance of getting it do you think im stupid?

@both it hurts that you guys both posted without paying attention to the details

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 10:32
#5
Terrty's picture
Terrty
almost forgot

@khasmin fov has more speed and a 3 strike sequence, however, DB has a slow speed and attacks that of a DA/GF.

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 10:34
#6
Shotjeer's picture
Shotjeer

What Waffle is saying is that since there is obviously more than three boxes in the boss treasure room on any mode, an elite FSC run will pretty much guarentee a new 5 star weapon. So either make the drop rate 0.00000001%, or just remove this idea entirely.

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 10:46
#7
Terrty's picture
Terrty
my god shotjeer come back when you can read ouyvay

i repeat, its all boxes COMBINED FRICKING COMBINED NOTTTT PER BOX, GO BACK TO KINDERGARDEN IF YOU CANT READDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 11:52
#8
Skyguarder's picture
Skyguarder

No. People will get the weapon easily anyways.

And this thread doesn't deserve a -1 nor +1. Using personal attacks as an argument is horrible.

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 11:53
#9
Terrty's picture
Terrty
??

personal attacks???

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 16:33
#10
Waffleconecake's picture
Waffleconecake
This guy is a twat. We really need to abandon thread.

I nominate Terrty for the "worest forum user since Hetero" contest.

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 16:50
#11
Shotjeer's picture
Shotjeer

I am so sorry. Would you like to take one of my anger management classes free of charge as a gift?

At WCC, no, since Saho-woops, No naming and shaming.

Sun, 09/08/2013 - 23:37
#12
Hexzyle's picture
Hexzyle

What about Blandy, Earth, and Blue?

Mon, 09/09/2013 - 02:45
#13
Blaackblue's picture
Blaackblue
Bad idea, needs to be reworked

The Dragon blade has too high a chance to drop from boxes, people would farm vana even more and flood AH with it (people do vana too much as it is, and this would just give people more reason to [scrap] and moan about it) but the concept of the sword itself might be ok if you reworked it a bit. for the shield, its just plain unoriginal in multiple ways that i don't even have to say, not to mention that you can't have a shield give a bonus that increases as it levels up. Even if you give it asi med at the beginning, since its 5* it would make swift strike useless which is bad. just make a swift strike upgraded version instead of a new shield. unlucky driver, again you can't have a new weapon that is too closely related to an old one but better, cause it would make the old one useless. instead ask for a buff to umbra, but it cant be curse because that would make it too OP. Having it as a drop from UFSC makes it less farmable, but still not a good idea. if you want to have a gear only obtainable from a drop, then make it a rare monster drop like dark fang shield, not a boss drop (just my personal opinion). the jelly armor sound *kinda* ok but you would have to put sleep status back in to justify a new gear with that resist, and im not just talking about slooms i mean a whole cadre of sleep monsters(preferably wolvers to make that perk worthwhile).

@Hexzyle i hope you aren't talking about me o_0

Mon, 09/09/2013 - 03:39
#14
Hexzyle's picture
Hexzyle

If you're Bluebrawler, then yes :P

Mon, 09/09/2013 - 03:45
#15
Blaackblue's picture
Blaackblue
Just makin sure

ya know, cause you posted on my other threads so i know that you know me...

Mon, 09/09/2013 - 11:15
#16
Battlegrinder's picture
Battlegrinder
Pretend I wrote something clever here

Sloom Armor: damage bonus vs beasts would ok, but we already have armor that does that. The sleep defense is useless and redundant. I see no need for this item.

Dragon Blade: ignoring this issue of the drop system for it, the dragon Blade seems to be the same as the FoV. Again, it's redundant.

Dragon Shield: actually, this one's not that bad. An ASI shield would be a nice addition, and would be quite useful to many players.

Also, for the love of whatever you hold sacred, use punctuation and grammar. Your post is virtually unreadable as is, which turns off a lot of readers.

Mon, 09/09/2013 - 13:13
#17
Skyguarder's picture
Skyguarder

Yes, Terrty. If you say "COMBINED FRICKING COMBINED NOTTTT PER BOX, GO BACK TO KINDERGARDEN IF YOU CANT READDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!", it's like telling someone to GTFO if they can't do this.

Mon, 09/09/2013 - 14:57
#18
Terrty's picture
Terrty
got a bit to say skip to your name if ya wznt

@waffle im a lockdown pro, and overall game pro but a fourm noob dont make fun of a noob pleasealso worest???? worstest is more gramaticly correct LLOL

@shotjeer passed my class today but thanks for the offer

@blackblue ok im gonna reduce the drop rate to .10 percent per box mabye a buff on umbra sounds a lot better than the exact same weapon with curse .also i was planning a fourm for bringing back slooms and stuff ever since i realized they used to exis

@battlegrinder i already fixed the droprate erlier in this post i also adressed a bring back the sleep monsters erlier in this post too. As for my grammer its just they way i type dont question it alsp id love to talk to you in the game so freind me[this goes for everyone].

@skygayrda by the time you see this i will have edited my very mean comment out.

Mon, 09/09/2013 - 18:13
#19
Battlegrinder's picture
Battlegrinder
@ Terrty

First off, "worest" and "worstest" are equally awful from a grammatical perspective. In the same vein, if "just the way you type" happens to be "the wrong way to write", you should fix it instead of expecting other people to try and put up with it (because many of them won't, and will instead elect to spend their time elsewhere). I'm not going to mock your particular style of writing or the phrases you use, but I will expect you to use middle-school level English.

Bringing back the slooms (assuming the devs can fix the issues they had with sleep in the first place) will only move the armor you propose from "useless and redundant" to "redundant". Unless you can come up with a reason why we need 2 piecing resistant armors with sleep resist.

Ditto with the sword, as fixing the drop rate will still have it be a redundant weapon.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system