it won't be always crowded. I saw an alt-rigged BN match with 3 alts and one main, if it's possible to get 4 alts on the same game, it's possible to get 2.

I personally have 3 T3 alts, so that's not a defense Mitzhawk. It's not that hard to get a T3 knight for LD to farm it. Takes no more than maybe a week or so, maybe less if all you make is the starter cobalt armor. So I'd have to agree, no to the koin rewards. 1v1 matches would only be for bragging rights, so there should be no substantial reward.

-3 to this suggestion
and -5 if this match give prestige point or other good reward
because people will abuse it and 1v1 ld match will only make this game worse~ why?
this feature can make flame war in sk community, example :
??? : hey you
Floe : ?
??? : let's do 1v1 ld
Floe : nup, busy
??? : you scared?
Floe : i said i'm busy.. jeez
??? : noob fake horse badge
Floe : -_- you fight wrong person man

even with 6v6 people still do it~ but more bad... loser must delete character (remember darkcub?)

Maybe what Floerail means its that there will be people bothering you no matter what. and honestly having people bothering you because you got a horse badge by doing prestige mission while that dude got it from 1 vs 1, even if we can ignore those people, you can feel "comfortable" with that because that dude will talk bad about you with other and some people dont like that.

No matter what, even if it only prestige. there shouldnt be a reward in 1 vs 1 due players can abuse it, not matter if you dont abuse it other people will do it. (Also probably devs are planning what they will do with prestige points because at this point we still wait for them because they said "we will get rewards with our prestige").

if it only for fun then why you want a reward? if it only for fun, to challenge people, then dont need a reward. Now if you want to make it interesting then add a bet system that only handle player cr and with certain limit amount of cr that can be placed as bet. who win the game get the cr and only come from player wallet, so the game shouldnt add cr or pay the player. just a bet between players and their crowns only. in that way players set up the rewards and not the game, so even if you try to "play agaisnt your alt" you cant abuse it because is taking away crowns from yourself and not from the game.

now there should be certain restrictions like. if a player log off or leave they will lose the match and cant do 1vs 1 for 24 hrs, players that disconnect due internet problem would be like a draw nobody win but the player who disconnected cant do 1vs1 for 24 hrs (since you cant tell how a disconnect is legit maybe they know they would lose and didnt wanted to lose the cr they place as bet so they disconnected like turning off the router or whatever)

Hey, i said maybe. Wasnt really confident bout my idea; i didnt really give any thought to it. Anyway Im remaining neutral to the bet system for now

I honestly feel the ones who must set a bet (or well the "prize") are the ones who going to play, and not spectators. and should be optional to set the prize in 1 vs 1. if you challenge a guy to 1 vs 1 you can place a prize lets say you place 5000 cr if the guy win, and the guy place 5000 cr if you win, but this option should come like an agreement before start the match some kind of option like "do you want set a prize?" if one of the side doesnt accept then the match would be without prize.

but never mean that the spectator should place the bets lol. the problem with 1 vs 1 with a prize system give by the game its that it can be abusable (the day that OOO comes with rewards for prestige) and if it only for fun then 1vs1 shouldnt have rewards. if you make the prize from 1vs1 comes from the players that going to play 1 vs 1 then it feel ok since the only reward comes frm the players that is going to have the match and if you make it optional, people will find it ok.