Do you already considered multiple accounts' problem?

But the inverse can occur too:
20 up on a post.
Expectation: 20 people liked it.
Reality: 5 people with 4 alts liked it.

Don't believe? There was a person on SK that had 4 different accounts.
It's possible.

I wonder if I could code this and send it to them. It doesn't sound that hard to be honest, and it would be a really cool way to see what the "good suggestions" are.

The problem tied to a voting system is that a suggestion could actually be healthy for the game, but heavily downvoted because players don't want it.

For instance, UVs. Nobody with a high-power UV (or three) would want to lose it (them), even if UVs are pretty gamebreaking at high-power, and one of the things that keeps 'casual' players from being able to compete fairly in Lockdown. Realistically, there's no way to accurately give compensation for something like UVs, which have a gambling system rigged up for them. [But I seriously believe they're unhealthy for the game, crown sink or not.]

The inverse is also true; something players want might be unhealthy for the game! Some people might want to hold on to their exclusive gear from temporary events, because it'd be special that way. But at the same time, anyone who just happened to join later or was unable to play during that time would be completely left out. That'd be just okay if stuff like that was purely cosmetic, but then there's things like the Obsidian Crusher and Black Kat Cowl and Tortodrone shields.. things that have some sort of stat variation or even entirely different mechanics that only a select few will ever be able to use. That's bad.

Another thing to consider is that some people might vote for what they can read, and not bother voting for something good (or even bad) that has a massive wall of text or a discussion of game mechanics that they can't offer anything to.

And, even more importantly, it's not like everyone has equal merit to vote on everything- somebody just starting out and someone who knows how the game works like the back of their hand have different levels of experience. A newer player would have a better idea of what the 'new player experience' is, and an older player wouldn't have a clue. Similarly, a newer player wouldn't be able to reliably discuss gear/enemy/level design, but an older player would.

It just wouldn't work as well as it sounds.

My point is I don't want the worth of someone's argument being influenced by a voting mechanism. Without one, people are judged for having good ideas and arguments, not mob mentality..

I figure at least one of the community managers summarizes and relays what they see to the devs.

What I mean by "mob mentality" is that there are people out there that will upvote things without really thinking about them, simply because a lot of other people upvoted it before them. Then there's cases where things that are easiest to agree with and shortest in length are likely to have higher ratings, simply because some people might not read the walls of text in other threads..

Call me insane, but I'm a firm believer that a good argument is better than being backed by more people.

Being able to prove your ideas are right is a good thing, and arguing helps to iron out any possible flaws. As long as there's no mud-slinging and hair-pulling, it's healthy. I also like to think it gives better feedback overall.

If voting was ever implemented, there are a few things that could help you get the best of both worlds (what is right, not what is most popular + organizing things by score).

-Above all else, do NOT track points across comments/suggestions like with Reddit. Even if they're meaningless internet points, some people WILL try to hunt for them instead of actually being helpful.

-Multiple sorting types. It could be helpful to have an option that ranks things by the amount of votes they've received, both positive and negative, to pinpoint controversial topics (which would be prime targets for dev-to-player interaction). Then there's 'order by positive (or negative) score' and then the standard 'most recent' we've got right now.

______________

I think what I'm most wary of is that some "good" suggestions would die out not because they were bad, but because they just didn't get enough community attention for some reason. I've seen plenty threads go by that have solid arguments/ideas but die off because there's nothing left to discuss..

Usually, controversial threads or maximum-hate-petition threads are all that survive longer than a few days; whatever gets the most posts gets the longest life.

I don't think I'm arguing with you for the right reason right now, because I'm being concerned with a problem that would exist anyway..

_________________

Also! If you want to get rid of your subject line, put a zero in that field.

True, true.

And then you have to ask...

Can Drupal even do any of this? Do they even have a web designer around to change anything on the website at all?