Yeah, but the arbitrary task scoring works on a small number of samples. Some players don't play enough games of Lockdown to provide accurate statistical analysis.

+10 for the cap, +5 for a defend, +1 per 100 damage, +1 per 10 points.

The problem with giving too many points for damage is there is alot of bad "good" players who won't cap points or try to defend them, they simply want to fight 2 or 3 enemies at once and rack up damage. Yes they help the team but not nearly as much as someone who gets 5+ captures a game and half the damage that the "good" player does.

I left points in because there are also the games you win 500 to 0 but wouldn't be able to get many ranking points out of because the other team hides behind their shield the last half of the game. This way at least you are gauranteed 50 points on a 500 point game and it still allows for the best players to separate themselves from the weaker.

I also don't agree with having less points for someone who loses vs someone who wins. There are quite a few times when a good player has to carry an entire team, or the team has 1 or 2 players quit and they would win by a few points otherwise. The match-up system is already horrible; penalizing good players for getting a bad match-up, which happens 50% of the time I would estimate, wouldn't create an accurate reflection of who is the best in lockdown.

I should mention that my numbers above are for teir 2 gameplay, I believe this would need to be adjusted for each teir as higher teirs do more damage then lower teirs, as I haven't played much of any teir other then 2 I don't know what would be a good number for those teirs.