Forums › English Language Forums › General › Suggestions

Search

Give us back the Pepperbox Charge!!

12 replies [Last post]
Wed, 02/22/2012 - 18:51
Dark-Flare's picture
Dark-Flare

This appeared a lot in the Arsenal section, so I'm putting one in the Suggestions too :)
Devs, Please change back the Pepperbox's charge to vacuum again! That was what made the Pepperbox effective! The knockback now makes its performance very poor!

Also, the knockback for the other autogun lines... is it really helpful? Personally, i think not.

Please support/ disagree/ post thoughts, wateva

Thu, 02/23/2012 - 04:05
#1
Lomase's picture
Lomase
100% agree, Pepperbox NEEDS

100% agree, Pepperbox NEEDS to be changed back =(

Thu, 02/23/2012 - 04:12
#2
Verodius's picture
Verodius
+1

Agreed, one of the main reasons I like(d) the Pepperbox series was because of their "harpoon" effect (aka "No you're not gonna die in those Brambles/Shadow fires and deny us loot buddy, get over here")

Thu, 02/23/2012 - 04:42
#3
Duke-Sky's picture
Duke-Sky
@ Verodius

Harpoon gun actually sounds like a cool idea xD

Sat, 03/17/2012 - 12:48
#4
Espil's picture
Espil
+1

It's arguable usefulness aside, I think removing the vacuum effect simply makes the weapon far less interesting/enjoyable.

-espil

Thu, 02/23/2012 - 19:12
#5
Lomase's picture
Lomase
http://forums.spiralknights.c

http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/44606#comment-290018

Tue, 03/06/2012 - 15:58
#6
Beans's picture
Beans
Whyyy

Just came back to the game after a few month hiatus, and..

What the ****?!

Every time I mentioned getting Pepperbox to anyone I knew, they laughed. Why? Because it was terrible. Just about anything it did well, other guns did better. Its damage was meh, its typing was neutral, its Fire effect was negligible. The only thing you could consider redeeming about it was the suction on the charge that allowed you to focus-fire on a target.

And they took that away?!

Not just that, they made it PUSH enemies away?

And you'd think since it was clearly a bad gun to the point that it wasn't even worth acquiring, they'd give it some kind of buff at least while "fixing" it, but no.

Augh, I'm just so confused I don't even know at this point.

Somehow they made my terrible novelty weapon even worse.

This is the most bizarre thing to me.

I'm genuinely disappointed.

Tue, 03/06/2012 - 16:02
#7
Severage's picture
Severage
@Tazurin:

N-N-NECRO!

Lornase posted the link where Nick said it now functions how it always should have...

No point in complaining about it now, much less bringing a thread back to life.

~Sev

Tue, 03/06/2012 - 16:34
#8
Beans's picture
Beans
@Sev:

It's hardly been 2 weeks. That's an awful short time to consider something a "necro".

I've read about it, apparently, being a fix for a glitch. That doesn't make it any better.

It worked better that way, and it wasn't overpowered [or even decently-powered] so why not implement the suction as an intended feature?

That aside, the Pepperbox is even worse than it used to be now, so it needs a buff even harder than before. I could go and make a new thread just to suggest that, but it seems a little redundant when we have this thread.

Wed, 03/07/2012 - 06:15
#9
Hexzyle's picture
Hexzyle
They could simply buff the

They could simply buff the damage and that would stop everyone's complaining. The gun now is what it's supposed to be. There are other ways of buffing it rather than bringing the bug back. (which they, i can assure you, are NOT going to do) Just wait for a buff like everyone here with weapons that are UP.

Wed, 03/07/2012 - 06:58
#10
Beans's picture
Beans
Of course. I'm not saying the

Of course. I'm not saying the vacuum effect was essential to the gun, but just that removing it nerfs the weapon, and it was certainly already bad as it was.

A damage buff would be fine. Has there been any actual word that it is getting buffed though?

Thu, 03/08/2012 - 19:23
#11
Hexzyle's picture
Hexzyle
I'm sure this just falls into

I'm sure this just falls into the "Buff Normal Damage Weapons" suggestions now. No point arguing for the bug back because that's not going to happen.

Thu, 03/08/2012 - 20:02
#12
Beans's picture
Beans
I'm not arguing for the bug

I'm not arguing for the bug back at all. No point implying such.

Also, http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/46591

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system