So it has been said that people on the forums are a minority, a very vocal minority with radical views of some sort and that isn't hard to believe.
But at the same time I am inclined to believe that we the forum members have more knowledge than the typical knight due to a few basic happenings:
0. Forum goers act as opinion leaders
-If I want to learn something... I ask on the forums, or I google it. Google then takes me to a forum post about "which brandish is better" or a sword guide.
-People in game discuss these issues off of the forums, and many arguments stated elsewhere get heard+posted.
-We read much of what is posted, and evaluate it.
-When shard bombs happened, many people didn't like the change despite not owning any shard bombs. People to date do not use shard bombs seriously.
1. Knights on the forums are, on the whole, more knowledgeable about gameplay mechanics
-We sit here and discuss our tactics.
-Some of us, do legitimate research into the game, and share that knowledge with the populace- starting with forum-goers and friends.
-We critique each others' actions, and question things that go on. "Peer review"
2. The typical forum goer has access to a larger degree of gear than the average player
-The "average player" in this case would likely be 3-4*; these represent the "majority"
-Many forum goers are 5*, and end up collecting all of the bombs, all of the weapons, all of the battle sprites etcetera.
-Forum goers DO cycle- tons of people have left, tons more are here. The ones that stay however, will by nature improve their arsenals.
-Being "on top" leads to a much better assessment of the game when it comes to certain changes- things like shard bombs, for instance.
-Being "on top" means you don't have to worry about gear, and can free up time to watch newer players to better your posts towards the game.
3. Greater time investment
-I don't just play Spiral Knights, I partake in the forums. This drives me to play more, and keeps me in the game.
-I know for a fact that many of the forum-goers have a couple thousand hours in game.
-This guarantees that they should have some idea of what they're talking about.
Now, by the common knight I mean the populace. If you were to poll every single knight in the game, what would you find? What would you get?
-A large number of people that just started. Their feedback is crucial in a different way- they offer early-game feedback about what they felt, and are by and large worthwhile when it comes to things like "Should pets be in the game?" or "Is the energy system bad?" But when it comes to "is acheron too powerful?", they wouldn't know. These are typically 2-4*.
-A large number of 5* knights that are still early on. They're still farming vanaduke to build up a second set of gear.. they don't have access to acheron AND gran faust yet, they don't have the time put in to master both swords, and get most of their tactics from other knights... who both generate their tactics, and get them from us.
-Many T4 knights- meaning that they are capable of farming shadow lairs. They themselves are under-represented, but are still present in the discussion... even if they just lurk, they still likely talk to people or are part of a guild, and when they do talk, their opinions eventually reach the forums- if they are seen as valid, and they often are.
Um so everyone can have an opinion and many a time those opinions are met harshly and rudely by forum-goers. Just because you have more game-time doesn't mean your opinion carries more weight. You may remember if someone's opinion was already denied (or even implemented) but it doesn't make you superior.
What does make someone superior is compassion and kindness to a noob suggesting a GRAND NEW BIG idea that has in fact already been suggested twenty times...as opposed to trolling them with demeaning and conceited responses.
Anyway, I generally agree with most of what you wrote, just (some of) the wording seems very 'class-warfare-y'
-Lanny