Actually this isn't taking too long, it just seemed like a lot was linked up via the "associated links." Anyway, noticed some clutter on the Recolored costume pages, cleaning that up too. There will be a bunch of micro edits for the first few as I cross-reference all of the formats on their pages, then it should go smoothly.
Note: sometimes I am linking to the bulk group, other times I am linking to a smaller group within the bulk group - I link to the smaller group if they all have a preceding similar name, like "dangerous." Other stuff is given an arbitrary group name, because they happened to be released at the same time, and as I fixed with the furniture "doodad" term (fixed to be direct links instead of doodad), I don't like linking through slang/unofficial terms. Let's just hope there's not some horrible linking issues in the future, like if they come out with Ancient Dangerous items in the distant days of years passing...or something. That's a bit of an overlap group for users, but it's pretty distinct for editors...but as far as relatability? Nightmare.
I like spoon's edit on the tailed helm page - I've added this to other pages, but it could potentially get very cluttered/messy as more items are added. I tried to solve this problem by having multiple forms in the same row on the main page, but horizontal expansion is not good on the wiki (nor is vertical but we can't avoid that) - and it only covered costumes, not gear. I suppose someone looking for costumes is interested in all aesthetically-related items, regardless of what type of arsenal item they are... heh.
Thoughts? Suggestions? I would do a category page of "forms and slightly altered forms of both gear and costume items" (named better of course), but that's not as user-friendly - unless it is linked to properly.
Regarding this issue, I'll be leaving the rest of the "see also" costume sections alone - for now I just did the Tailed Helm, Sallet, Pith costume helms and the Culet, Cuirass, Brigandine, and Draped Armor costume armors).