I think crimson hammers should not be allowed because when somebody has it in a game it`s too unfair and they would just spam the hammer over and over again
No Hammers In any Tier Lockdown
you know if you don't like this topic then why post in it?
Because this topic has been debated before, therefore I am only going to sum up the previous debate, no need for debate in this thread.
Hammer is as ridiculous as flourish Pure dammage, considerable forward movement and range on second swing....
Besides ALL weapons can be spamed by cliking and cliking. With that logic, ban everything.
Also delete all the other duplicate topics you made.
This guy was So mad, SOOOO MAD about hammers that he rage clicked on Post Thread 4 times to make spam thread.
LD ragequitter detected
you know if you don't like this topic then why post in it?
If you don't like your neighbor crapping on your carpet, why don't you just leave your house?
Dislike AA hammer spammers. Respect non-AA hammer users who use it as well, if not better then AA users.
that's how I go, and it seems to work
I didn't see anyone complaining about how 'Skolver Clone gear' should be removed due to it's hax-ness.
"you know if you don't like this topic then why post in it?"
That's a terrible argument. Never say that again. Ever.
-1
I think entitled little brats like me should not be allowed because when somebody reads my posts it`s too unfair and they would just spam the spam spam spam and bacon.
How about, instead of banning hammers outright, we ask for three rings to disadvantage hammer users somehow? I.E by causing their swings to randomly light them on fire (snicker!) or for the dash attack to occasionally blow up the hammer in gremlin knocker-estique fashion, stunning and damaging the user?
(1-614): HOW ABOUT I DON'T WAKE UP TO THESE TYPE OF SUGGESTIONS
You dont got any argument. You just want them to remove them. Therefore, no, It wont happen.
Yes, hammer rules. Too much. Far too much. But banning it from LD...lol, might as well ban FF, GF, and DAs.
~Sev
people paid good money for the expansion pack and the hammer, for many reasons, LD was one of them so you might get in a lot of trouble if they banned hammer PUNK KID
I agree that hammers are somewhat OP than some other weapons in lockdown (like the cutter series) , but that doesn't mean it is too cheap of a weapon to use. Some hammer users have no skill at all, just spamming them and leaving their behinds right open for attack. There is no weapon that is "cheap" only weapons that are "annoying." It depends on how skilled the user of the weapon is. An Arc Razor or a Shockburst Brandish can be just as "OP" as a hammer if they are used correctly.
...I am attempting to refrain from posting offensively, but this is proving difficult...
Why did you necro a hated-to-firestorm thread to say something I believe has been said at least 6 times by 4 different people?
If we must ban hammers from Lockdown then we might as well ban all weapons, because all weapons have their disadvantages and advantages.
I'm now going back to what Laraso said. How could you possibly spam a hammer if you can't do anything but swing it?. Seriously, there's no spam when it comes to Spiral Knights. By the looks of it, people just act like spam means using a weapon and... what's wrong with using a weapon? Lots of people that complain about spam use weapons, so they're hypocrites because they don't have a legitimate reason to say that they spammed and if spam means doing a combo repeatedly then that means hitting is technically spamming because we have the same repeated combos, it's just one combo and you can't change it to another.
So, quit [firetruck]ing complaining about spam!
OH HELL NO... Another ONE OF THOSE WHINERS
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/69844
Think again!~ Hammer is not something easy to spam. Why don't you get one for yourself ~~~
I would accept hammers, but hammers with AA and pure spamming from hammer... that is something I will not try to accept easily...