I have no idea what you mean by "7,3". But- Hexzyle made this threadand Gear-Storm commented this.

Considering Hexzyle's thread about damage split, you *could* use Gear's data to figure out the splits of damages and calculate the best possible spread per attack but it would be quite strenuous and not very practical, considering how the split of damage is on a continuum according to Hexzyle.

For best results, you would probably want to think of the attack(s) you deal with most when using any given set of items. For instance, lets say my weapons and playstyle make me prone to grievers. Grievers deal status in a cloud, and shadow damage. So the best defense against them would be as much shadow defense as I can muster, along with at least +10 status resistance. If they are fire flavored grievers, I would probably want the full divine setup with fire med+ and optimally 2x shadow max. Then, I can rest assured that when the fire grievers come, I'll be ready.

As a rule of thumb and according to the wiki, most ranged attacks are primarily special damage and most melee attacks are partially normal, with a few exceptions. So you'd want primarily special defense with a smaller amount of normal damage....

But really, you're sacrificing a ton of offensive potential for a bit of minmaxing of the defenses. Would you rather have:

A)The optimal defense that exactly resists what you're fighting?

B)Defense that roughly matches what you're fighting, and some combination of ctr/asi/damage/msi that benefits you?

We don't have anywhere near enough armors to maximize both of these things 100% of the time. For instance, vog has more normal defense than elemental. If you wanted to prioritize elemental defense, you'd have to sacrifice the "sword speed med" perk. If SEGA made a new armor that was just vog cub with its elemental and normal swapped, I don't think people would be particularly thrilled by its stats enough to take it seriously anyway.