I don't see a reason to argue with the judges.

Sorry I don't feel your pain.

Relevant.

sorry i'm still laughing at the sports couches 😂

@theirillusion
I really laughed when I read that xD Gotta find that thread with the lies.

Itsmeandersonlol

> Then, you will explain us please, why do the dmg in random lockdown game SIGNIFICANTLY changes whether the player uses auto aim or not?

Valtiros: Can you prove if any of the players who scored higher damage used AT?

I scored 20k with a 4* Faust alone. I use no trinkets and no AT. My armor isn't heated. Perhaps you've heard of me: Killerhotness.

Proof here Judges are not logical.

"A message from daddy

This is what happen when you try to make a tournament without auto-target for people that has never play without it. I'm 101% sure that most players will toggle or play with AT all matches.

And I find hilarious that all the people defending Alessio are well known for being AT users, with the exception of Reto, but this kid thinks Hadn doesn't AT, so his opinion on the subject doesn't matter."

- let me translate, "Let's host a tournament even though we dont trust people and think they are going to ruin our fun and come in here with their AT and toggle. I find it hilarious people who are experienced with AT think they know how to identify it; obviously they have no say because once you AT, it stays on forever. All you ATers band together to try and ruin us Non-ATers' good time! *sits next to dAArkcub at the judges table. Us non-ATers know what we are talking about, why do you think we are judging this tournament? Obviously cause we can identify it. Let's ignore all counter arguments that prove we could be wrong."

Good Game, unreasonable tournament is unreasonable. Don't enter (or any future ones) if you don't want these people as judges, end of story. Life lesson for all. Everyone go home. The tournament and life continues onward.

"(insert whatever theirillusion says ever)"

- let me translate, "I hate AT and it shows no skill, I came onto this children's PvE-focused mmo to test mah skeelz!!!!! And I hold grudges against all those who do well and use AT (i keep a list of names!). I shall prove my dominance >:UUU!!!!"

AT makes your aim much better (maybe not on some guns, but swords yes) period, but I thought such arguments were intended for games like LoL (PvP focused) where everybody can rage their hearts out about who is better at a video game and who is worse for using certain game features to their advantage.

I'm not biased (provided I have all the evidence and in this case it seems like it), I'm just out for the truth. IF Alucard was using AT and it was obvious/proven, you can bet your life I'd agree. Even if that meant he pitifully used AT on a guardian with his OP much better gear just to win a tournament match. But the way I see it, it's up in the air and a rematch should be done. The truth is the truth.

inb4someoneincorrectlytriesto"translate"whateverIsayinanattempttoprovetheirpoint

@Glowupball Feller isn't a judge and he didn't take part in making this tournament, you should know who is ''daddy'' before jumping in conclusions

@Glowupball His name is Daddy-Feller, I said his words because he is banned in the forums and can't post, I will edit it to prevent more mistakes.

@Glowupball I don't know if he is your friend or not, I don't know either is you really think that it wasn't AT, but we decided that he doesn't deserve a re-match and it can't change. Now that the decision is taken, Alucard can keep being an ATer (I repeat it again, not 100% sure in this tournament) or prove that he can be something else. If he proves that he isn't just a noob I will the first one recognizing it.

I've defeated Alucard in Lockdown lots of times and Alu defeated me numerous times as well. I've defeated AT players numerous times that boast. I've beaten Epic-Legend three times in a row, and beat Ezho enough times as well. Don't know what the fuss is about. AT isn't a steroid-inducing prompt.

Insulting the judge because of saying what does he think doesn't help either. I'm sorry but... oh wait I'm not sorry, you don't deserve any re-match, garbage.

Yeahhhh

I think it's impossible to run a tournament without controversy in this game.

@ Bleyken, The simple fact that you admit you dont know for sure, yet you keep pointing at me saying, "AT". Just goes to show how ridiculous this tournament really is. You guys start this out by saying "Is not NOT necessary to record". Then you accuse me of AT for an angle on my combo, which is just an opinion, and upon closer inspection you failed to recognize the most crucial fundamental in examining such an action (also an opinion). But what really upsets me is that you had the audacity to brand the video of me performing the combo behind a very talented singer/songwriter, singing about AT noobs and expect me not to lash out. Bleyken, your a loser dude.

@ DrDovis not everyone can record and play comfortably at the same time, common sense, people be broke. Also, I was having trouble finding a suitable software to run at the same time. I will start recording all 1v1s now that I've found one.

Frenk

Drdovis: They use incredibly expensive UVs and have exceptional skill. Ezho has damage bonus max and ASI max. He uses Acheron and Brandishes. Even I can score 50k with that with no AT.

I used to always play with AT until I discovered how much flexibility no AT provides aim-wise. I scored my highest damage on my record with a Flourish without AT.

@Bleyken
I don't mean to be offensive right now, but you should reread the entire thread and picture how OTHER PEOPLE are looking at this.
-Ton of reasons disproving judge decision.
-You don't want to have people come up with, "Bleyken only disapproving rematch for Muffin-Top," while this drama is what it's making it look like.
-One judge calls AT while the others don't have much opinion on this = Automatic disqualification.
-Bleyken's "Alucard for being an AT noob." ~> Indicates biased towards AT users. Whether you said it out of frustration or you truly believe it, this is how other people are seeing this. And some people go crazy when they suspect AT. /me underlines "suspect."
-"Ironic that people supporting Alucard are AT users." THIS IS JUST SOMETHING YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE SAID. It literally just makes you LOOK like you think noobs are banding together if they even remotely support Alucard in the slightest increment. This causes tension. Also ~> That's rude to me personally, considering I was one of the biggest people against AT for a really long time, and even now I RARELY use it in RLD and when I do, I blatantly mention it as a warning beforehand. So wow, thanks. People looking at this forum can now brand me as Quote, "AT Noob." for supporting somebody.
-Probably half agreeing with Alucard where you outright branded him an AT Noob through bad choices and words, then call him garbage for insulting you. Kay, so who's just ganna sit there and take being insulted? Not Alucard, that's for sure. "Garbage" used from not seeing this, causing tension.
-Decision is apparently final when the judges do not have much to lose upon giving a REMATCH. You don't have to give Alucard the point.
- Apparently some AT users don't know how to play without it. This is not the case for all AT users, yet from the looks of Bleyken's posts, this is what it LOOKS like he's focused on. For example, look at Darkcub. He's well known for using AT and people brand him a noob and can't do much without it. In my opinion, Darkcub has a lot of movement and footing and can do better than the average player without AT. TO ME, NOT OTHER PEOPLE (Yet, I count as a person reading this), it looks like ~> Darkcub's role as a judge and his existence is a counterexample of your argument.

Once again, MOST of the above isn't my own personal opinion, just the part where I feel crudely insulted and the last part. This is just what the viewpoint looks like from average forum readers and posters right now.

I apologize if this post upsets you and if this is frustrating, Bleyken, but you have to look at this based on what's being said. This forum right now alone is creating bad publicity for the judges, the competition, and especially you. Make sure your next step doesn't make it look even worse than it already is, because I don't want this more overly blown than it is now because I don't feel like coming back to forums to look at this out of sheer curiosity, wasting my time more on Alucard's disqualification. Sure, it's important and my own friendship with Alucard makes we want to get involved, but I honestly DON'T want to get involved even though I'm posting this now.

The simple fact that you admit you dont know for sure, yet you keep pointing at me saying, "AT". Just goes to show how ridiculous this tournament really is

And what can I say? I can't see your ***** screen. Stop crying like a 5 year-old-kid

But what really upsets me is that you had the audacity to brand the video of me performing the combo behind a very talented singer/songwriter, singing about AT noobs and expect me not to lash out. Bleyken, your a loser dude

How can I be a loser because of that?

I'd put that song for all the AT users, not only Alucard. The song goes beyond the tournament, everybody knows about how is Alucard in rld. But I still don't get why does it make me a loser, even if I look like a clown or not, I don't regret. When I look at an AT user I just see a non-skilled person, but when they think they are pro players the non-skilled people become garbage.

So the people isn't wrong, I might look like a clown, but a 101% sure about himself clown.

@Teddy -"Ironic that people supporting Alucard are AT users." THIS IS JUST SOMETHING YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE SAID. It literally just makes you LOOK like you think noobs are banding together if they even remotely support Alucard in the slightest increment. This causes tension

I didn't say that, you're the one who should re-read the part which says A message from Feller

-Probably half agreeing with Alucard where you outright branded him an AT Noob through bad choices and words, then call him garbage for insulting you

I have never said that Alucard insulted me, again, re-read the post.

(Yet, I count as a person reading this), it looks like ~> Darkcub's role as a judge and his existence is a counterexample of your argument.

I didn't choose to be a judge, they just needed judges, I personally think that Darkcub was pretty good when he wasn't an AT user, but he is actually a noob, and being a guildie doesn't mean that I won't say he's unskilled, because he is unskilled if he uses AT or toggle.

This isn't frustrating for me, I don't feel insulted, there are many different opinions

@Bleyken, Your a loser because you point at me saying AT, then you go back and say your not 100% sure, then you say AT. My conclusion is your a loser. You think you and your group of friends are the only people that don't use AT. You think what I did was impossible without AT, so not only are you a loser, your a simple minded fool as well. Keep the insults coming. I can go all day.

@Alucard-Xz Your a loser because you point at me saying AT, then you go back and say your not 100% sure, then you say AT

I said, that in the tournament, we weren't 100% sure, but in RLD I could bet my neck, you AT, AT and AT. If you have any problem with your reading just re-read again until you realize, ty. http://i.imgur.com/jg8xASb.png I guess you won't realise even reading it since you're a bit slow, but don't worry.

Every time I read your posts I see a 5 year-old-kid crying. If you have some people who help you don't make them look like idiots defending a baby. You can keep calling me a loser if that makes you happy, I don't really care.

Another tournament thread turns into AT jibberjabber.

"1. How do I believe on someone: He HAD some LD videos showing AT and toggle off BEFORE the 1v1 (And I say HAD because videos AFTER the 1v1 don't f***ing count) or I saw him in RLD without AT. I would let them do a re-match"

This is exactly where the problem is. you are a judge, you have to be impartial. you must judge everyone in the same way , regardless their fame, their past or anything that is not in the tourney itself.