Forums › English Language Forums › General › The Coliseum

Search

2v2 tournament

9 replies [Last post]
Fri, 11/07/2014 - 04:40
Valtiros's picture
Valtiros

Ok so, I make myself clear. I am NOT organizing a tourney . It would cost money and I do not have such a thing as money.
It is only a suggestion: I personnaly Dislike 1v1s It is stressing And Frustrating . to me 2v2 are a lot funnier. we must not forget that lockdown is not a game of individual performance, this is a teamwork game.

So ,those who support my idea please leave a comment and perhaps some nice and rich organisators would consider mking this tournament ! :)

Fri, 11/07/2014 - 05:52
#1
Bleyken's picture
Bleyken

We are gonna make one after the 1v1.

Fri, 11/07/2014 - 11:07
#2
Valtiros's picture
Valtiros
Ok great! I'll be patient! it

Ok great! I'll be patient! it let me the time to find a good partner, ( have already ideas but .. :3)

And..of course the tourney would be ATless..but the question doesn't even arise .:D

Fri, 11/07/2014 - 16:34
#3
Krakob's picture
Krakob

Why not try something new? An idea I've had but never tried out is 3v3 point control. Two teams of three players compete for a single point on the map. They fight for the point from the start until the end of the game and when time is up, the scores are the teams' scores. Of course, you'd have to put some restrictions on weapons to make it a proper fight (limited amount of bombs and Polaris, mostly). Of course, no duplicate classes allowed on either team!

Fri, 11/07/2014 - 17:08
#4
Valtiros's picture
Valtiros
It's a good idea but I think

It's a good idea but I think the problem would be the reviving countdown. It would be an unfair game based on chance I suppose.

Fri, 11/07/2014 - 17:38
#5
Krakob's picture
Krakob

I wouldn't be too worried about that. In the end, the more skilled team would probably win even if they get worse RNG with revive timers. Besides, you can always just allow spark revives.

Sat, 11/08/2014 - 03:35
#6
Theirillusion's picture
Theirillusion

And GL finding people enough being able to record and wanting to be different classes and being online at the same time.

Fri, 11/07/2014 - 17:46
#7
Krakob's picture
Krakob

In what way can you manipulate the respawn timer? I have not once seen any conclusions about how it works.
No need for recording at such a large scale, imo. While it would be nice to have a tournament guaranteed free of AT, there's no way you can get that many people to record. It would just be better to let it slip so that it could happen at all.
Getting people online would be hard, yes. Since it would be a rather large thing, I believe it would be a good idea to set times for battles and simply disqualify teams who don't show up.

Mon, 11/10/2014 - 02:23
#8
Reto-Da-Liz's picture
Reto-Da-Liz

You respawn at xx:01, xx:16, xx:31, xx:46. Shortest respawn time is 7, longest is 23.

Mon, 11/10/2014 - 03:21
#9
Valtiros's picture
Valtiros
But then , you can t use this

But then , you can t use this rng manipulation while fighting. I mean,you won t choose the moment you die ,you just keep fighting and try to survive the longest possibke while killing the opponent. You won t commit suicide when you are low life , will you?

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system