Spiral Knights - I challenge Epic and Gun.

I challenge Epic and Gun.

44 replies [Last post]

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 13:13

Bullpig

I challenge Epic-Legend-Knight and Gun-Shots to 1v1.

Rules:
1) No weapons aloud that deal status on regular attacks (i.e. storm driver, fov, polaris)
2) AT must be off.
3) Must record and show AT and toggle off.
4) Must upload recording no matter what, win or lose.

Challenge valid for 1 week (3/22/15)

If I win, you quit using AT and learn to aim like a big boy.
If you win, I'll never rant about AT or call you noobs ever again.
If you refuse to accept my challenge, you are proving me right.

None of this is to say you are unskilled players. However, I'd like to see proof that you can actually do something without the game aiming for you. I'm sure this is fair. And hey if you beat me, I'll actually respect you and I'm sure so will a lot of people.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 14:41

Krakob

ohhhh its on like dankey kang

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 14:42

Sweetsundere

But good luck anyway

Epic doesn't come to these forums so I say you should mail him in-game instead.
And they won't play, get ready to keep calling them ATer noobs. (And also cowards.)

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 14:49

Gun-Shots

Leave epic and I alone, we

Leave epic and I alone, we don't associate with non-At noobs like you.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 14:54

Slice-And-Impale

There will be alot of rage posts pretty soon……

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 15:35

Sweetsundere

Slice

Not really, still no point on arguing with a kid acting immature as his way of fun.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 16:05

Gun-Shots

I'm acting like a kid? You

I'm acting like a kid? You guys are the ones getting angry because people are using a simple game mechanic... heh and I'm the kid.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 16:24

Bullpig

@Gun-Shots

i wouldn't go so far as to say we're getting angry that you are using a "simple game mechanic." however, people tend to stand up and defend themselves when they are called "noobs" by AT scrubs, and when someone who can't aim for themselves claims to be "pro."

there should be no little to no recognition for these players. there are some exceptions, but very few. neither of you are one of those exceptions in my opinion.

i understand if you can't accept my challenge due to bad net or no recording software, but you just don't want to fight, proving that either
a) you're scared of not being able to aim on your own, or
b) you're scared of fighting me

all i'm asking is that you fight me. no accusations here :) not calling you a noob, just want a fair fight, is that too much to ask?

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 16:32

Gun-Shots

Ok, but you are saying that "

Ok, but you are saying that " little to no recognition for these players " so what you mad for ? That we are getting recognition?Btw, why can't you just play the game why do have to throw a temper tandrum when someone with AT beats you?

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 16:41

Bullpig

@Gun-Shots

temper tantrum? you're twisting everything around my friend. i simply want to have a fair 1v1 with you

and no i don't think that you even receive recognition in the first place. i was saying in general, AT players should not.

you talk big in game, about how you can take me on 1v1 anytime, yet now you can't prove that you can take me on. if you would just keep quiet and not try to chirp everyone in RLD, i would not have to resort to making an entire post about this.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 16:50

#10

Sweetsundere

"I'm acting like a kid? You guys are the ones getting angry because people are using a simple game mechanic... heh and I'm the kid."

Not the AT, it's you as a person on this one, but i'm not going to go further.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 17:13

#11

Junggigo

No AT = Gun-Shots looses
^Fact

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 17:18

#12

Slice-And-Impale

cannot spell :3

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 17:32

#13

Gun-Shots

Jung, I know for a fact I can

Jung, I know for a fact I can destroy you without auto target so you should just leave this thread, and bullpig, I'm nowhere near afraid to fight you, I really just don't feel like I have anything to prove to a bunch of whiny babies.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 17:38

#14

Junggigo

Anything is easy with more than 1 bar, lol your weapons hit me an in game meter away so...
Lol anyways I could rek you if I had your connection :3

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 19:28

#15

Skiino

......

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 20:13

#16

Sipsy

No experience/degree Lawyer Mode Activated.

As much as I love you Bull, you're going against some of my beliefs/morals of a challenge ( and you banned my favourite weapon ). So I'll play the devil's advocate and defend the challengeee. As I have a problem with the prizes, the challenge and the rules - as well as the claims and allegations.

I believe that my clients ( the challengeees ) should have been treated fairly in the drafting of these outrageously unjust law-- uhh rules* by having an equal hand in drafting them.

1. The weapons: If you're banning My favourite weapon (storm driver), the challengeee should have the right to ban a weapon that they think (know) is unfair like the sealed sword line, which gun-shots would probably do (coz 180* is cheaper than AT), you know, if he had been treated fairly when he was challenged.

2. The prizes: Why do you get to pick their prize? You picked your own, they should pick theirs. The, "never use AT," is a much bigger prize ( or consequence on the challengeee's side ) than just plain, not talking about it - which by my standards is not being an 'A' bomb in general ( Shots fired ). What if their prize was that you ( bull ) had to always use AT, if they win. Now that's an equivalent priced prize.

3. Problems with second rule: Furthermore, one rule is, "No AT," this defeats the purpose of said point up top. The challengeee should be able to use what they believe is right and if they are beaten, then you can have the prize.

4. Problems with your claims: "If you refuse to accept my challenge, you are proving me right."
It is within their right that they are able to decline, otherwise it wouldn't be a challenge. Heck, there'd be no way I'd accept such a biased set of rules either.
And how are they proving you right? There are no consolation prizes for having your challenge rejected.

5. Must record: Following (2.), only the person without AT should record, right?

"I'm sure this is fair." I couldn't have seen anyone more delusional in my life, in the court of la-- Uhh... In this forum page right now.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 21:04

#17

Electronicfighter

Last 2 posts

Yes! Electronicfighter Agrees!
Also I thought you quit, Winkle.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 21:36

#18

Sipsy

I have, I'm 2 weeks sobe--*CoughCough* free of SK. But I haven't quit discussing ( and preaching my opinion ) ;o

Also,

a) you're scared of not being able to aim on your own, or
b) you're scared of fighting me
{...} no accusations here {...}"

This is very contradictory.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And I missed the point here.

If you refuse to accept my challenge, you are proving me right.

None of this is to say you are unskilled players. However, I'd like to see proof that you can actually do something without the game aiming for you.

Proving you right on what point, exactly? Proving you're right in saying that they can actually do something without the game aiming for them? I really don't see the point that you're trying to prove in the challenge you made though, not that it matters since rejected challenges have no consolation prizes, I'm just curious as to what it was.
-------------------
P.S. You have the right to remain silent and anything you say can and may be used against you in the court of la-- on the forums.*
Edit: Added some more points, as at Sun, 03/15/2015 - 21:35 FTRN ( Forum Time Right Now )

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 21:44

#19

Bullpig

LD community is so cool and fun

how ignorant of me to think that for once someone would be able to detect sarcasm over a forum post.

this post more of a troll than anything. i never actually thought that either would 1v1 me.

for the rules i just followed standard ranking rules. and for the prizes i really didn't care what they were since it was never going to happen.

Sun, 03/15/2015 - 22:21

#20

Sipsy

this post more of a troll than anything
So you were just seeking for attention? Man.. Ggwpnorespawn.
Who would have thought that my respect for a person I viewed highly could be lost in just one line.

Then again, getting beaten in an argument and calling it a troll. Yeah. Protect your ego s'more.
LD community. Not the best ( LOL ), but still pretty entertaining at times.

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 03:58

#21

Gun-Shots

Billpig want a fight, well

Billpig want a fight, well let's give him a chance, he fighting with a knight but I'm fighting with my hands. Who was the one to challenge me today ? He, but who's the one that's going win this battle? Me, it's true that I AT like I do but weren't you the one complaining and going boo hoo? You better shut your mouth befour I punch you in the face right in front of your guild, you're such a disgrace. * drops microphone *

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 05:19

#22

Bullpig

hmm

i see your points. and you're right. i'm not the type to easily admit that i'm wrong but i suppose i've made a large boo boo here

while i do encourage competition, i suppose this was just a way for me to try and prove myself in someway that somehow would make me feel better. i see now that i was way off. it's much more imature of me to have done this than any of the times gun-shots has called me or many numbers of people "noob."

so i formally apologize for my actions here. this does not however, mean i am not against AT any more. this just means that i'll think before i say anythhing, and if i plan on responding or even starting a talk about AT, i'll make sure it's in a mature fashion

sorry again. gun you keep doing you

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 06:29

#23

Bleyken

Don't apologize. You did well. All these "" just search for stupid excuses to not have to show any skill... and I can't even insult them without getting banned...

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 06:35

#24

Theirillusion

Epic-Legend-Knight is garbage. Anyone who worships him, look down, take off your diaper and learn to use the bathroom.

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 08:25

#25

Bleyu

I'm still waiting for him to accept my challenge, and I'd like to point that he doesn't even need to record the 1v1. With me uploading my 5-0 win is enough.

The first time he told me he had not enough ppl to organize the gvg, even when I could get subs he didn't want to play. Second time he told me he couldn't play because he broke a key from his keyboard. Let's see what excuse does he use today.

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 13:36

#26

Gun-Shots

If I fight you, can I use AT?

If I fight you, can I use AT? If not then nty, unless you pay me 500k then I will gladly 1v1 without AT, dumb non-AT nubs.

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 15:14

#27

Valtiros

Does this guy realize that

Does this guy realize that what he just said is the avowal that he can't be a match without the computer aiming for him?

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 17:27

#28

Tempas

@van-winkle

Your posts give me ebola.

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 17:27

#29

Sweetsundere

@van-winkle

Your posts give me ebola.

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 19:32

#30

Sipsy

@ last two

gave*

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 19:42

#31

Slice-And-Impale

@last 3

your post is ebola

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 20:43

#32

Sipsy

posts are*

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 21:14

#33

Sweetsundere

Icecreaam!

And do we look like we care about purposely bad grammar Van RNG DependAAnt "hybrid" ?

Mon, 03/16/2015 - 22:14

#34

Sipsy

The, "And," is redundant and grammatically incorrect at the beginning of your sentence.

Edit: P.S. You're making this too easy.

Tue, 03/17/2015 - 03:28

#35

Slice-And-Impale

you are ebola

Tue, 03/17/2015 - 11:18

#36

Bleyu

@Gun-Shots I'm not going to pay shit if there isn't a bet

who's van-something?

Tue, 03/17/2015 - 11:41

#37

Sipsy

You are ebola.*

@ Bleyu, I don't think we've met either. I'm Van-Winkle. Van's fine if you can't remember the other 7 characters haha.

Could we lock this thread, or leave it to die in the graveyard? It's been off topic for a while now.

Tue, 03/17/2015 - 11:56

#38

Bleyu

I guess you can't remember the rest either, Winkle has 6 characters 'haha'

Tue, 03/17/2015 - 19:31

#39

Sipsy

And that's how I get you to remember, good job. :)

Tue, 03/17/2015 - 22:15

#40

Son-Of-Hades

bullpig u sukk without

bullpig u sukk without brAAndish. Without AT, your pee would never fall in the toilet.

Wed, 03/18/2015 - 14:41

#41

Bullpig

+1 for creativity

so true!

Wed, 03/18/2015 - 16:29

#42

Retequizzle

sorry i'm late

Sat, 03/21/2015 - 07:51

#43

In-Exile

AT is unfair to those who have a bad connection. I've stopped using it(99% of the time xD) because I value sportsmanship. I have a decent connection and play well enough to not need it. Epic is a case where his ping is ridiculous and his range is out the window.

Sun, 03/22/2015 - 00:41

#44

Ill-Fate-Ill

The only time I've seen Epic with bad connection was over a year ago when he was on vacation in China.

Search

I challenge Epic and Gun.