I'm not sure what the etiquette is for undoing changes on the wiki so I haven't touched it, yet. Somebody messed up the alchemy tree for every armor in the line except padded armor. They all use the alchemy tree for caps. The 2 star versions seem to use their recipe as well.
Pathfinder/Shade/Sentinel Armor
Wed, 04/29/2015 - 19:53
Thu, 04/30/2015 - 07:43
#2
-
-
Wed, 04/29/2015 - 23:20
#3
it's fixed now.
Thu, 04/30/2015 - 01:04
#4
Woops
Looks like some explanation is needed.
Copypaste derps happen. This one was totally my bad. Line 80 - That was an oversight - part of the infobox project. Much sorry. I found another derp too for recipes and fixed it.
@Random-Remark : you are totally right to be hesitant. Raw undo commands are not smart, they usually don't fix things. Thank you for coming here and asking us about it first - we have to manually "undo" most mistakes like this. But fixes are generally easy and I'd suggest practicing various thing in the Sandbox if you want to help out in the future. We always need more editors, and we are always willing to help each other and the community.
@Deliciousness: the option is there. Just switch it over to the appropriate item. Flowchart has fixed it.
@Bopp: "What is going on with these templates?"
The new gunneritem pages are templated pages - something very lovely that icytea/flowchart decided to do because the gunner items were all so similar and needed to go up because people were actually complaining about the lack of 'em and it was a crap ton of work that got cut down to a simple bunch of switches. Trying to edit integrated ToC sections in a system like this brings you straight to the associated parent template, sadly, that's just the way it is. But in return for this slight derpyness we can easily fix and modify hundreds of pages at once (or mess them up all at once!) We discussed the issues of a "templated page" in another thread, which involved too many format changes so I backed off the idea. But yeah, the gunner items needed to go up, and the template used for these pages actually isn't my doing/creation or majorly against anything in those threads - it is well formatted, sticks with the wiki, and I fully support it. The minor issue with the attempted fix-of-my-derp was a capital letter, templates are silly and sensitive that way.
@Flowchart: thank you
Thu, 04/30/2015 - 05:45
#5
got it, thanks
Now I see how it's structured. And I do remember the thread where we discussed stuff like this.
He/she means that, for example, on the wiki page Sacred Falcon Pathfinder Armor, the alchemy tree names and links the helmets, not the suits.
Edit: I tried editing the Alchemy Path section of Sacred Falcon Pathfinder Armor. But something insane happened. I found myself editing a template rather than a section of this wiki page. What is going on with these templates? Has Novaster/Dracora altered the edit links somehow?