Forums › English Language Forums › General › General Discussion

Search

Race challenge [Serious]

35 replies [Last post]
Sat, 06/13/2015 - 19:11
Idiosyncrasies's picture
Idiosyncrasies

Greetings. I ve been running this challenge for two weeks now, haven't encountered a single problem until today, as I received a warning message concerning a 'potential scam attempt'.
The advertisement went as follows, mostly on zone chats:
'Hello there, Race challenge for you. Boss Run of your choice. Participation fee:10kcrowns. You win:220kcrowns for you. I win: I keep the fee.
(ps: the prize increases in parallel to my win streak, I'm on 22 now.)

So making this thread to cover every point and flaw one might find in this challenge, also accepting any advice on how to proceed in order to make it more 'legal'.

I let the challengers the freedom to pay either before or after the race . I m only trying to make this game a bit more fun for me, and the few people concerned. And I hope I can continue doing so.

Questions that one may ask:

How Do I know you've actually taken down the boss?
--> Every voluntary is friended right before the race, therefore we're both able to check whether or not any of us killed the boss, on event hub eventually. (F7)

What if you actually teleported to one of your alternative accounts during the race?
-->Both players have got to send each others party invites before stepping on the first lift, as the invite notification would disappear if anyone attempted to leave the party he was in.

What about you actually record your run?
--> My computer doesn't allow me to do so, and even if it does, I can't ask every challenger to do the same. But I guess the first two steps already cover every flaw this challenge might have.

Why wouldn't you just set free races?
-->Setting a prize and a fee makes it more challenging, a bit more 'stressful', which can only make it more fun. (Besides the 10kcrowns fee isn't that much really.)

I would really like to have a feedback from one of the moderators. Happy racing!

IGN: Idiosyncrasies .

Sun, 06/14/2015 - 04:16
#1
Start-End's picture
Start-End

I would like to suggest that you go with participant and die so you can phyisically view the whole run.

Sun, 06/14/2015 - 05:57
#2
Idiosyncrasies's picture
Idiosyncrasies
Eyy

The essential property of a race is not being in the same party, so it can't work that way. I m not questioning the reliabilty here as the flaws are pretty much covered. I m just trying to figure out why am I getting warned for suggesting something new.

Sun, 06/14/2015 - 06:24
#3
Bopp's picture
Bopp
um

The essential property of a race is not being in the same party, so it can't work that way.

Knight A runs the race with Knight B dead and watching, and then Knight B runs the race with Knight A dead and watching, and then you compare the times. It makes sense to me.

I m just trying to figure out why am I getting warned for suggesting something new.

Because it "smells" like a scam, even if we can't pinpoint exactly how it works. In other words, it's suspicious even though it's not clearly wrong.

For example, taking video would solve the problem, but you say that your computer can't, but I've never heard of a computer that can't. Maybe you could explain more.

For example, maybe you've discovered some quirk in the invitation system or the event hub, so that they are not trustworthy even though we think they are.

Disclaimer: I'm not saying that you're cheating. I'm just trying to explain why some players and administrators might be suspicious of you.

Sun, 06/14/2015 - 06:59
#4
Skepticraven's picture
Skepticraven
↓

@Bopp

"For example, taking video would solve the problem, but you say that your computer can't, but I've never heard of a computer that can't. Maybe you could explain more."

It's not that the computer can't, but that recording video while playing at the same time impacts play performance (usually lower FPS and longer loadtimes). Worse performance significantly impacts speedruns in action games.

Sun, 06/14/2015 - 07:47
#5
Start-End's picture
Start-End

Or you can setup two cameras: one to record yourself playing and the other to record your gameplay (fraps or something) and then sync the two like in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUFJKLjD-Mg

Adding to what I was saying erlier about you having to die and then spectating, schedule days with each day having two players on the same "team" going head to head (same equipment, no perks or UV's to be fair) with you as the referee. The person who can kill the boss gets the win and the other knocked out with some money (5-10 cr). On the last day, you have the finals where two OF THE BEST WILL SQUIRE OFF (Bad pun, i know)

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 07:14
#6
Aphrodite's picture
Aphrodite
Community Manager
♥

We don't allow events that require players to pay an entry fee. This is frequently used to scam players out of currency or items, so we don't allow it. Racing is a great idea for an event, but you can't require people to pay up front. If you have other questions about the policy, please send in a support request!

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 12:49
#7
Hunterxxy
@Aphodite

this is not completly correct... cause ur own sentence...

"We don't allow events that require players to pay an entry fee."

Well Black KAt Event... PPl pay for spot on a Margrel run most times they pay upfront... the Event itself is legal, too ..... and OOO dont send messages to ppl that it is forbidden to "sell" just a MArgrel run Spot....

Same thing to Tortoise Event, making an ID CARD for a spot in run ppl pay like 2,5kcr each to cover the costs of the Creator of the ID-Card...
in that Event u do not forbid ppl to spare the costs also....

(at Black KAt Event its not like sparing costs but for profits only) ... and all ppl agree with it..

and yea Idio-Syncrasies is saying that he wanna make such a "Race" and he also agree with it that ppl who want to accept the Chllenge are a ble to PAY their fee (if they lose) afterwards ..

so in my opinion all should be fine with it if he just take the fee after the Race.

once ago i was thinking of a Lottery system where ppl just bid on numnbers like 6 out of 49 ... and to implement that i record it at my computer or that just take the official numbers which are here in germany ... ensure that ppl knw that i can not Scam anybody...

and ofcourse i asked german support..

they answered me that they do not forbid it, but im not allowed to post it in forums..... cause they dont support it but they dont forbid it at same time to me...

best regards

Hunterxxy

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 13:37
#8
Fangel's picture
Fangel
Err...

The black kat event pricing for margel is a player-created idea. You don't have to pay anything to fight margel, however the players are greedy and decide to profit off the item.

Similarly, the March of the Tortodrones event isn't a scam service as only one player has to spend anything. We're just people too, so we ask for payment to go towards the card. It's the same concept with shadow lairs.

With this idea however, it is a single player with no background. You can only participate in this game if you pay up, whereas with Margel and the Tortodrone fight, you don't necessarily have to.

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 14:33
#9
Coreonn's picture
Coreonn
^

It's fine if everyone is doing it :P

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 15:29
#10
Krakob's picture
Krakob

We don't allow events that require players to pay an entry fee.
Wait, what? There have been countless of LD and 1v1 tournaments with entry fees and you haven't shut down a single one as far as I know.

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 15:50
#11
Fangel's picture
Fangel
Er..

The coliseum can be an icky place.

I wouldn't blame the GMs if they didn't go to that forum.

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 16:12
#12
Start-End's picture
Start-End

"Wait, what? There have been countless of LD and 1v1 tournaments with entry fees and you haven't shut down a single one as far as I know." -Krakob post #10

Unofficial ones and not for real money, they were crowns and energy.

I find it strange that Idio-Syncrasies isn't replying. There are comments from people (including my post #5) that I would like to see Idio-Syncrasies give their opinion on.

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 17:29
#13
Idiosyncrasies's picture
Idiosyncrasies
Knight A runs the race with

Knight A runs the race with Knight B dead and watching, and then Knight B runs the race with Knight A dead and watching, and then you compare the times. It makes sense to me.

The thought of spectating one's fails and imperfections isn't really that appealing to me. Plus it would be time consuming; everything I am trying to avoid. Knowing in advance how the contender performed would take away all the fun a race may represent. As it would just turn into a time trial contest at this rate.

you can't require people to pay up front

I've already mentioned in my first post that the fee can be payed afterwards, it may mean that the challenger can walk away without paying..but well I really pay no heed to the fee, so let's just consider it optional .

For example, maybe you've discovered some quirk in the invitation system or the event hub, so that they are not trustworthy even though we think they are
Let's not go that far.

I've received a two days ban even after I established some transparency on the contest. So I thought I should just give it up.

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 17:27
#14
Bopp's picture
Bopp
sorry to hear it

Well, I'm sorry to hear that you were banned. Nothing you did seems worth a ban to me. But maybe there is another side of the story that I don't know.

By the way, discussing a ban on the forums is not permitted by Three Rings. Best wishes.

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 18:04
#15
Idiosyncrasies's picture
Idiosyncrasies
.

.

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 18:42
#16
Finale-Flare's picture
Finale-Flare
I am about 95% sure

I am about 95% sure Idio-Syncrasies is telling the truth, and all he wanted was to host an event that would make be actually kind of interesting. The other 5% still thinks that this was some cheap way of making money, but that is only 5%.

Ah well, $#%# happens, if you were being honest then you didn't deserve that.

Tue, 06/16/2015 - 18:55
#17
Mergu-Md's picture
Mergu-Md

If I had to guess, you were banned because you were told to stop and possibly continued to advertise your races.

Even if users paid at the end, even if the runs were recorded, this still smells of a scam. I don't have anything against you - heck, I think you're a cool guy and we've even done some business together in the past. The way you advertised your runs and the way you talked to people about the races sent out a huge red flag though, as if it was impossible for you to lose. You even offered to give me (and anyone else who asked) a one minute head start.

A while ago I tried to host a lottery on one of my other Vanguard accounts. Users could buy up to 5 tickets, each assigned a number, and at a certain date I planned to use a RNG to pick a winner who would receive all the money I had collected from other tickets. I wouldn't profit at all from it. My intentions were pure to myself, but others disagreed. Eventually I was told to stop and I sent refund mails back to everyone who had purchased a ticket.

My point is that sometimes you have to know when to give up. Sorry you had to go down this way pal.

Wed, 06/17/2015 - 03:26
#18
Krakob's picture
Krakob
@Start-End

Unofficial ones and not for real money, they were crowns and energy.

So what's the difference? Many, many, many player hosted LD competitions have had entry fees in CR or E with no guarantees. This is the same except it's PvE based instead.

Wed, 06/17/2015 - 06:35
#19
Start-End's picture
Start-End
Hate to be THAT GUY, but...

IMO, it's silly that people think this race is a scam when the game itself is a freemium where you have a choice of paying for your energy or crowns. I mean, you can just grind for those.

I think Idio-Syncrasies is just doing this for fun. So what if you lose cr in the process, it just means you have to grind more. And after all, game devs want players to play more of their game.

Wed, 06/17/2015 - 13:44
#20
Fangel's picture
Fangel
Gah.

I don't think that Idio themselves is a scammer because I haven't seen them in action. However, if you know you're going to win up front, as stated in the thread, it might be a rather large turn-off. Personally, I don't feel a challenge is worthy of a ban... However here's a better system to go about it:

  1. Challenge the knights to a race
  2. There is no entry fee. Same rules you have set up otherwise
  3. Instead of an entry fee, all crown profit made from these runs are saved and given to an eventual winner.
  4. Donations to the pot are suggested at the end of the run if Idio wins, and if you donate you will be given a % of the pot whenever someone does beat Idio. No money back is guaranteed, and if the challenge ends then you purely donated crowns to Idio.

This way, you are not being scammed into a potential challenge. If you wish to donate crowns to the pot (with a maximum amount mind you. I'd say 10k crowns is the maximum players can donate to the pot) then you can get something back if someone else beats the challenge. You may get more money back, however since the initial bit was a "donation", you are not ensured to get money back, and as long as that's clear from the start, it should be okay.

I would say 10% of the pot is designated for donors. Of that 10%, it is separated even more per person. If the whole pot is 500k crowns, then the donor pot is 50k crowns. If there is only one donor, then they get all 50k crowns. If there are 10 donors, each would get 5k crowns. If you want more numbers swimming around, the maximum donors could get a higher percentage of the pot... In the same scenario maybe 1 donor gave 10k crowns, and the other 4 gave 1k crowns. Maybe the 1 donor would get 20k crowns and the other 4 would get 7.5k crowns. You can probably write up an equation for it if you need to.

Bottom line is, entry fees are a no-go. A post-run donation is okay, just make sure that the players know that donations may not give them more crowns, or any crowns back at all, and that they're okay with that.

Wed, 06/17/2015 - 14:13
#21
Start-End's picture
Start-End

Now i'm starting to get why people think this is a scam, although:

Idio said he was racing too. So its a challenge to beat idio's win streak i guess and if someone seems like they have a guaranteed win then that makes the challenge more fun, right?

You have to find a way to kill the other one on your "team". If this wasn't done with two people in the same party then the "race" would be like any other normal "everyday stock up on mats" run.

Wed, 06/17/2015 - 15:10
#22
Idiosyncrasies's picture
Idiosyncrasies
@

@Start-End I don't think you got how it works yet. Two players, me and the participant running the same boss mission in completely different parties(solo), first to achieve the mission wins. That simple.

@Fangel I stopped at 3 as 4 seems a bit complicated to me, and I m not sure if anyone would be interested in donating for something that doesn't depend on him. Plus the small game population..so well. And it would make it a gambling game more than anything else. I m sorry if you made some effort coming up with the process. This challenge is meant to reward the fastest of all, the only person deserving of the prize. I will be honest, I reckon it's very hard to beat me at this challenge and I can only think of two people able to do so. A surprise is more than welcome though, meeting unknown skilled players is the one first reason for me arranging this contest, one was 3 seconds closer from doing so, I didn't even accept the fee from him. Tbh, That made it up for everything for me.

2. There is no entry fee. Same rules you have set up otherwise
I keep mentioning that I don't require any fee to race me, and that could be given aferwards. I don't know why it keeps being brought. Entry fee was just a miswording from me due to game chat space restriction, I'm sorry about that.

3. Instead of an entry fee, all crown profit made from these runs are saved and given to an eventual winner.
That's exactly what I m doing. If you've read my first post, you can see that the prize is proportional to my winning streak. All the 10k payments aren't going to my inventory, but stacking up to give an important prize for the deserving player . And I seriously can't wait for someone to beat me on this.
I was just waiting for a CM or GM confirmation to move this on a proper trade. But well it didnt work as expected and I can't rerun the challenge unless I get a Moderator approbation.

Wed, 06/17/2015 - 16:11
#23
Fangel's picture
Fangel
No that's the thing

The 10k "fee" is still there. Instead of taking the 10k from another player, just use the profit from the run itself. If you run vanaduke and get 9k crowns, if you win, you add that 9k to the pool. If you lose, you add those 9k crowns to the pool then give the entire pool to that player. By doing this, it prevents the whole "up front fee" that you ask for.

Yes, players can just walk away from the fee if they want, however by making there be no fee anyways, you'll get more players interested and it will appear less scammy to onlookers, GMs included.

And I just wrote up a quick idea that was flowing there, no offense taken to you not wanting the 100%. I spent most of my time on the suggestions subforum and it often overflows to here too. I'm perfectly fine with others cherry-picking my ideas for something that works best for them!

Tue, 06/23/2015 - 16:29
#24
Nolidor's picture
Nolidor
The real problem is Spiral

The real problem is Spiral Knights is a childish game.

The race idea is a mature adult idea that only grown-ups can understand.

You weren't banned because you have a bad idea. You were banned because you contradicted the childish nature of Spiral Knights.

Tue, 06/23/2015 - 16:37
#25
Nolidor's picture
Nolidor
Another thing is Three Rings

Another thing is Three Rings doesn't like to see other people use their business idea to run businesses. For example, this is why items get locked onto users once equipped. This is also why the energy market only lets you see the 5 most marginal offers.

Again, SK is not a mature or adult environment. If you have a mature or adult idea, then SK wants you to go away.

That said, this is a general rule of the internet. :-\

Tue, 06/23/2015 - 16:36
#26
Nolidor's picture
Nolidor
My advice to you if you want

My advice to you if you want to run races is either: a) don't do it through SK itself, or b) form a racing guild.

Organize a league where Three Rings can't keep track of what you're doing. Then, expect members of that league to uphold their wagers or else they get expelled. They either get banned from your off-site organization or removed from the guild.

Tue, 06/23/2015 - 17:09
#27
Fangel's picture
Fangel
Um.

There's an edit button at the bottom of your posts. You can simply edit a post instead of creating an entirely new one to continue a train of thought.

Unless you triple posted and wanted to get some leverage out of that.

Tue, 06/23/2015 - 19:39
#28
Autofire's picture
Autofire
You are experiencing a PICNIC ERROR!

@Nolidor
All your arguments, no matter how valid, doesn't change the fact that multiple exploits have occurred due to the upfront fees. I wouldn't be surprised if this policy was followed in other MMOs.

Also, Three Rings won't ban someone for promising something for crowns and then not keeping the promise. This is also good policy, because otherwise we could make false accusations about liars. Once you complete a trade, that's it. Trade is done. Anything else is up to both parties.

This is why requesting participants exhibit good sportsmanship and give whatever they owe to the winner after the race. (But only if all participants have agreed to do so!) If someone doesn't pay, the host can exclude him from future events.

Why all this? Because this is the internet.

@Idio-Syncrasies
You should edit your first post. (For your own topics, go to the top of the thread and hit the edit-tab thing.) You should update your main post because this is what possible participants will first see.

One thing that would especially scare off customers is the part where you say "(Besides the 10kcrowns fee isn't that much really.)". Hate to say it, but THAT sounds shady.

As I suggested before, you should require that people give their fee directly to the winner AFTER the event. Those who dodge this fee could be banned from future events.

That being said, a reasonable upfront fee would make sense. (Due to aforementioned debt-dodgers.) Maybe just start with a 1k upfront fee and a 9k fee to the winner. Then gradually shift the fee from after the race to before as the community's trust in you increases. You'd want to check with the GMs first, though.

Tue, 06/23/2015 - 23:19
#29
Nolidor's picture
Nolidor
The way I think of it is like

The way I think of it is like a carnival game.

You pay up front. If you complete the task, then you win the prize.

Wed, 06/24/2015 - 00:42
#30
Hexzyle's picture
Hexzyle
BTW, you need a licence and a permit to run a carnival

Idio is an adult. Three Rings doesn't like adults, so it banned him for his adult behavior.
#flawlesslogic

Wed, 06/24/2015 - 04:14
#31
Finale-Flare's picture
Finale-Flare
Here comes Nolidor, the great

Here comes Nolidor, the great warrior of the Energy market, here to offer an opinion nobody cares about....again.

I think OOO took mecessary precautions against a potential scam, despite how honest it looked. What should have happened is that IF someone got scammed, it should be reported, and THEN banned him. This situation is more of a guilty unt proven innocent case, and Idio didn't have good enough evidence.

Oh well....I think Idio should get a freebie and we can all move on.

Wed, 06/24/2015 - 08:04
#32
Autofire's picture
Autofire
You are experiencing a PICNIC ERROR!

The way I think of it is like a carnival game. As Hex said, does Idio have a license? Understand that carnivals are run by a large body and have all sorts of oversight. And they're physical events. This is the internet.

In other words, they're defending childish attitudes. It's really simple. Idio is an adult. Three Rings doesn't like adults, so it banned him for his adult behavior.

I love how you say that someone without patience to proofread his post thoroughly is an adult. Not that proofreading is a sign of adulthood (I'm not an adult), but still...

The ban was a rather rash move on Three Ring's part, and I am rather disappointed. That being said, Nolidor needs to not be so harsh. Maybe the GM in question (probably Aphrodite) had a bad day? Community managers are people too, and I doubt that they bring up a conference whenever a single player infringes a rule; it's probably up to the manager who sees the problem to do something about it. Then they move on to the next (of many) issues.

And if Three Rings disliked adults, wouldn't that, in extension, mean that they hate themselves?

For anyone in the future hoping to run a race (reading through the thread makes it sound like Idio quit), I would advise you record the run! Tag along and kill yourself. The fact is that if you have hard, recorded evidence, you can put all the runs up on Youtube and thus boost your legitimacy. It's really hard to fake a video, after all.

Well, I might actually run a race. So that I can see what works. Or I might just contact the managers for how they accept such an event to be held.

Wed, 06/24/2015 - 08:42
#33
Nolidor's picture
Nolidor
Carnivals can be overseen but

Carnivals can be overseen but they're not always. It depends on the town.

Wed, 06/24/2015 - 15:37
#34
Idiosyncrasies's picture
Idiosyncrasies
Eh

I have already stated everything related to this race..But well I realized the thread was falling on some deaf ears, so why even bother. Those fees better be wasted on Punch (;

Thu, 06/25/2015 - 07:50
#35
Reto-Da-Liz's picture
Reto-Da-Liz

Sucks that you got banned for these reasons.

It's interesting to see how OOO treats similar cases in such different ways. I can only imagine how many times Contri would have been banned, and how many other people doing raffles and hosting runs with fees (SL, Magrel, Tortodrones, etc.) would have been subject to the same treatment.

Way to go OOO.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system