so grey havens put a volcanic plate mail on your volcanic plate mail so you can plate while you mail
i heard you like volcanic plate mails
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 01:38
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 07:33
#2
What are you even saying?
The palette has been rotated, and the costume version is based on the base Plate Mail model like the other Plate Mail costumes. Yes, they are objectively unique.
But what does mental attitude, something subjective, have to do with objectivity?
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 11:43
#4
woowoo
Can we also get an ironmight promo so we can put ironmight plate mail on our ironmight plate mail?
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 15:52
#5
objectively speaking, there is now nothing stopping me from going into trade chat and ^*(@ing with people over which armor i'm either selling or looking for, and i would have a solid argument for why i'm not in the wrong regardless of which one i'm choosing to do.
but yeah, no one would do that. definitely not me, nope.
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 16:37
#6
Sorry
My post was directed at Midnight. I forgot to put a ^ or an @ to clarify.
Yeah. I know they share the exact same name, which makes me question why GH would do that.
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 16:40
#7
@Delecated
But what does mental attitude, something subjective, have to do with objectivity?
Ever heard of the term, 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder?'
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 19:16
#8
?
^I have indeed, but your statement of that term only brings up more discrepancies.
What I would like to know is: why would pointing out that these items are indeed different be considered an optimistic action?
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 19:24
#9
@Delecated
Oh I don't know, but is it me or is there a severe lack of actual content? And when the there is content, they are so similar to the existing ones that they might as well have not existed?
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 19:39
#10
???
^That may be the case, I do not follow how that reasoning would lead to the statement having a connotation of optimism.
The person would just be stating that these two items, are indeed, different.
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 19:48
#11
:/
Agrees that content is lacking
When a reskin that is so close to the original is here, says that it is different, hence saying that it is actual content.
says that he is not optimistic.
I am going to now leave you to Bopp. Delecated.
Thu, 11/03/2016 - 20:47
#12
?????
^How could the person saying "it is actual content" be derived from them stating "it is different"?
Your arguments are non-sequitur, dear sir.
Fri, 11/04/2016 - 04:58
#13
@Delecated
Since when did I say my argument is meant to be logical? Like I said before, 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder,' whether I believe that the new costume is classified as a new content or just reskinned old content is up to me. Again, personal opinion is not required to be perfectly logical, if you want pure logic distilled of any irrationality, then I am sure Bopp will keep you company.
INB4 some one who is awfully optimistic says 'but rete, the colors are slightly different on the volcanic armor parts so it is technically unique!!!'