I've played a lot of lockdown games and i feel that armors SHOULD have the same amount of pvp potential. Apparently, the Wolver line is the best line so far, both in pve and pvp. Other armors that have damage bonuses to monsters don't fare well enough in pvp(though i play as a chroma in T2 lockdown and still get lotsa kills and do lotsa damage). Do you think that all armors should have same potential?
Should all armors have the same amount of pvp potential?
Fri, 11/04/2011 - 03:52
Fri, 11/04/2011 - 07:40
#2
Umnoletsnotdothat.
No. Great thing about this game is that there is variety, if you make everything a clone of something else.. then that would suck.
Cheers,
~W
well, actually i disagree.
what would be the point then in going with different styles and resistances?
i think u could maybe put a negative buff on wolver line, since its slightly overpowered(at least the dusker is, wolvers die in 2-3 hits of a grintovec)
but u have to remember there are t3 trolls that equip full dusker, trinkets and all weapon slots. then it gets annoying.