So is information about Game Masters (the players in the game) sensitive or may we discuss what equipment certain Game Masters wear, and create pages for them if enough is known about them?
I'm wondering because I created the http://wiki.spiralknights.com/Purring_Cap page and I'm wondering if it was appropriate of me to put the fact that GM Clotho is the only player seen wearing the hat.
If you see it in game, feel free to document it. If you do create pages for equipment that is only seen on GMs, definitely note that so that players know they're probably not attainable.
Ok, but do I put that "It appears that only admins have access to this equipment" or can/do I actually mention names?
You can go with something like: This equipment has only been seen on Game Masters and is presumably not obtainable by players.
If you want to list who has been seen with it on, feel free to add that info as well.
Ok that answered the question, thanks.
Just kinda getting the grips of that the smaller a wiki, the more unofficial things are allowed on it. (I thought minecraftwiki was a small wiki until I came here. Over 2k edits between Ultradude25 and I in 30 days and here I see you not touching a page for over 2 weeks at a time sometimes XD I was like wtf this place is deserted)
I was kinda shocked when I saw that this wiki allows pages for player guilds, fanbased work and that the recent changes list was dominated by UserPages changes and changes to (Guild) pages. "NO! HERESY!" My exact words XP
There are plenty of edits every day. It's not a competition to see how many times you're on Recent Changes.
Yes indeed, each game wiki is different from game company to game company and even from game to game within the same game company. The trick is to be open to learning how things are on a particular wiki while being an enthusiastic contributor.
Thanks for the encouragement Equinox. Sorry about my ego :S
OMG Kawaii:3