I want to compare their damage, mathematically, in Tier 2 and 3
that also includes the 5* variants of the swords
I only have a hunting blade and not enough materials, crowns, or energy to make a vile striker
I want to compare their damage, mathematically, in Tier 2 and 3
that also includes the 5* variants of the swords
I only have a hunting blade and not enough materials, crowns, or energy to make a vile striker
the Hunting Blade doesn't even have a higher base damage?
Hunting Blade does more damage to Beast types, as far as I know that's all?
Here's the thing, meowreka. Poison drastically lowers defense. So, no matter WHAT you're hitting with the vile striker series, as long as it can be poisoned, you will be doing more overall DPS. Considerably more.
Vile Striker's line also makes soloing Royal Jelly a joke.
So again I say: Poisoning weapon good, version of same weapon without poison useless.
it also looks a lot cooler, compared to the dread venom striker.
Oh well.
I recall reading somewhere that the hunting blade line did slightly more base damage than the vile striker line but I can't actually find anything to back that up now. Wiki images implies they do the same base damage. Even if the hunting blade line did slightly more damage I doubt it would offset the defense penalty from poisons (to say nothing of the other advantages that poisons give).
That's why I was asking for anyone who has both weapons, or knows someone who can help them to compare damage against enemies so we can get some real numbers on the damage.
I refuse to believe that the Hunting Blade is outright useless. Three Rings wouldn't do that to me... would they?
Yes, they would. More than 70% of the equipment in this game is completely useless in the 5-star category.
Your little furry-flinging sword is no exception.
Well knowing that, then, Hazel... I will be content with having a less-than-perfect weapon for tier 3 romps.
I'd rather be slightly less powerful than a Venom Striker user, who is slightly less powerful than an Avenger user... than use the weapon that everyone is using and look incredibly non-stylish.
Call me a hipster if you must.
So now you're being high and mighty and looking down at everyone who uses the effective weapon, even though style is subjective.
I'm not going to call you a hipster. You're a jackass.
Don't worry meowreka, you'll always be a hipster to me.
Three Rings has knack for making things useless. Or maybe they just really like Vog Cub, I don't know.
If they liked Vog Cub, they wouldn't have replaced its old Movement Speed bonus.
Stupid Nerf Everything Syndrome.
And as a note: WHB actually had less base damage than DVS, in the preview times. It seems their attack bar is the same now, although I'm not really able to test that, since I don't have either.
I'm so underground I hide my Vog Cub under a Fencing Jacket.
My helmet costume? You've probably never heard of it.
So seriously how much damage do they do.
you can hide your mainstream blade under a cool lookin sword and nobody except the gadget inspectors will judge you
EDIT: "Mainstream Blade" would be a neat yet bland name for a sword
I propose "Mainstream Blade" be the eventual upgrade to the Winmillion.
In other news, I'm told the hunting blade has a wider and longer area of effect than the the vile striker. But since both make you move around the battle field like some kind of spastic knife salesman trying to hock his wares upon the monsters in the Clockworks, range is a moot point.
Why does it matter to you how much damage they do? You've already clearly stated that you're too cool and chic to use what is actually worth using.
Hunting blade +10 damage(high) vs beasts, I have both swords. Both hit the same on everything else, normal damage.
One poisons, one doesn't.
The one that doesn't is useless.
You're welcome.