Forums › English Language Forums › General › General Discussion

Search

Rose Regalia, economic principles, and sweet costumes

14 replies [Last post]
Thu, 05/03/2012 - 13:50
Soarel's picture
Soarel

I was studying economics and considered applying de-inflation to the Rose costumes, because I seriously want one.

So here's the idea:

-Let's just pretend that the Red Rose gear is avaliable for 1000 crowns in the Haven Bazaar.

-Because this color Rose is cheap, its total value will decrease, and there will be less demand for it.

-The other Rose color sets would remain only avaliable from the Redux event (if it returns) or featured auctions.

-So thus the costume would be avaliable as a cheap suit, and the economy is safe.

Any thoughts?

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 13:59
#1
Divisor's picture
Divisor
Not sure if suggestion or

Not sure if suggestion or just trolling... c_c

Well, that doesn't make sense at all.
Seems like you only want that costume and thus they should magically lower its price.
I'm afraid that won't happen.

PS: Green Rose looks far better anyway ^w^

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 15:08
#2
Spectrumized's picture
Spectrumized
What? o.O

What? o.O

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 15:57
#3
Soarel's picture
Soarel
Divisor, please...

I mentioned Red rose as an example because all the others are based on it.

I do indeed prefer the green rose actually. But thats unfair.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 16:02
#4
Iron-Volvametal's picture
Iron-Volvametal
Is it that time already?

Yellow Chap Thursday?

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 16:18
#5
Fehzor's picture
Fehzor
rofl You're all wearing the

rofl

You're all wearing the rose regalia in your avatars...

Anyways, that would reduce the price of all rose regalia and promotional items under the logic that if OOO decides to sell whatever for ridiculously cheap, they'll sell other items for ridiculously cheap eventually. Look at the outrage that the tiny community of "wealthy" players put up after OOO tried to sell the rose regalia on the featured auctions.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 17:26
#6
Korakc's picture
Korakc
What about the people who

What about the people who preiviously bought red rose sets? They would be VERY mad, I will aussure you...

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 18:01
#7
Soarel's picture
Soarel
Gray rose?

Maybe a completely different set like Gray Rose.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:33
#8
Dukeplatypus's picture
Dukeplatypus
I want an Orange Rose

I want an Orange Rose Regalia!

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:35
#9
Kielos
I am 100% against this idea.

I am 100% against this idea. Rose sets have been traded at inflated prices so much... this is a terrible suggestion.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 20:42
#10
Guardianknight's picture
Guardianknight
WWWwwwwhhhhhhaaaaaaatttttttttttt!!!!!!!!!

There's an Orange Rose Regalia?
I want one.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:11
#11
Dukeplatypus's picture
Dukeplatypus
3rd gen Rose Regalia: Orange

3rd gen Rose Regalia:
Orange Rose Regalia
Periwinkle Rose Regalia (alternatively Cyan)
Pink Rose Regalia

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:22
#12
Guardianknight's picture
Guardianknight
I have changed my mind due to a platypus who is a duke.

I want a Periwinkle Rose Regalia xD

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 21:29
#13
Rommil's picture
Rommil
hehe.

duke....3rd gen is coral and violet. fyi.

and i don't think the original post makes any sense.

Thu, 05/03/2012 - 22:01
#14
Derpules's picture
Derpules
Shorter version of the OP

"If OOO sells red chaps for cheap, red chaps will be cheap."

WOAH

P.S. "Deflation", not "de-inflation". And the high price of rose sets has nothing to do with inflation anyway. Economics: ur doin it rong.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system