Get right the $%&* up on EVERY topic that even remotely resembles a suggestion in general or just leave them alone, quit this picky choosy "move it to suggestion" $#i! on only topics you dont agree with or dont want to see.
That is all.
~Luke
@ Players who think they are mods.
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 18:54
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 18:57
#2
Wait, your not a mod for
Wait, your not a mod for telling us what to do right....Also, no you don't tell me what to do only Dogrock does since he been telling me what to do since Beta.
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 18:59
#3
@ Players who think they are
@ Players who think they are star wars characters LUKEHANDKOOLER
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 19:00
#4
They suggest that so that the
They suggest that so that the GMs and Developers can go see their thread in the Suggestions. Make it a little easier for them.
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 20:33
#5
~The Cobalt Dragon
Oh, good, you made another topic; now I don't have to mail you in-game to continue discussing this.
Concerning myself, I've only ever said 'move this here' on a select few threads that were more suggestions than anything else. Maybe other people have, but that doesn't warrant calling me a [expletive].
The reason people say 'move this to suggestions/etc.' is so the forums can be neater, and as Mindspark brought up in part, makes it easier for the devs. If we were backseat modding, it wouldn't be so simple as 'move this here'; there would have been other things to bring up.
Not to be rude, but assuming that the only reason anyone wants to move a thread is because they don't want to see it or they don't agree with it is... kind of narrow-minded. In my case, I didn't say I didn't agree with it as a reason for wanting it moved; I can see why you'd think that, but if you look a bit more into it, you don't see many people in the Suggestions board saying they disagree and then 'move this to the graveyard'.
Maybe us forumites are picky as to what goes where, but taking someone's disagreement or someone saying things need to be moved as offensive, personal, and backseat modding is... well, I think this is a good example of my frustration.
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 20:42
#6
FALCON PUNCH!
thread invalid at http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/54201#comment-378384
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:12
#7
@
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/54201#comment-378384
What has this got to do with anything?
Other then having been posted by a player that has a post thats SEVEN PAGES LONG on the front page of general forume that is a SUGGESTION to change the price of Ce?
~Luke
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:14
#8
No subject line spam here, move along
Nope, it's telling the players to raise the CE price.
Now, if it was telling the devs, then it WOULD be a suggestion. Wup.
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:19
#9
"Lets Raise the price of
"Lets Raise the price of Ce"
Sounds like a big fat suggestion to me.
~Luke
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:20
#10
No subject line spam here, move along
look at the thread contents before judging the metaphorical book by its metaphorical cover, perhaps?
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:22
#11
In case you're too lazy
"What you have to do if you own Ce:
1. Do not throw it in the market for 3,500 or lower.
2. Only sell Ce for 6,000 to 10,000 Crowns (Put all the amount of crowns you desire in that price bracket)
3. Do this for about two to four days or even longer the prices will go up dramatically fast."
So yes, it's definitely a request to other players, not the devs.
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:24
#12
@ DukeP
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:27
#13
Hmm? I'm not Pladypus,
Hmm? I'm not Pladypus, Pladypus is Pladypus.
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:29
#14
^
And I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn.
~Luke
Thu, 05/17/2012 - 23:29
#15
No subject line spam here, move along
I am who I am.
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 03:02
#16
*&$%#$ off mods you can't $#(%*#$% tell me what to $(%*#$%.
You #%#%# little $^*^ I'm going to %$( your $^($% and then put a $%(#$% in there to make it %#($.
Then when the battery acid sets in I'll $^(*#$% and $*%$# until there's not a single $%(#$* left.
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 04:04
#17
Luke, there are elements in
Luke, there are elements in your other topic that make it more like a suggestion than an idea for the players; it involved things that don't currently exist in the game, not things that could potentially exist in the game.
To name a few:
-The party being wiped upon the HC player's death
-Halved crafting costs (Theoretically, you could emulate this by using CE from your main character, but it doesn't actually change the cost...)
-HC versions of towns specifically for HC players
Also, your last post kind of admits the entire thing was a suggestion to begin with...
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 06:50
#18
it involved things that don't
it involved things that don't currently exist in the game, not things that could potentially exist in the game.
Really there is unequivocally no difference to the 2? scenarios you just listed above.
-The party being wiped upon the HC player's death
You either misread or did not understand that there would be no mixed parties.
-Halved crafting costs (Theoretically, you could emulate this by using CE from your main character, but it doesn't actually change the cost...)
If you had bothered to read and or comprehend the earlier posts I already outlined that * only * mist would be shared between a HC/nonHC on an account.
Also, your last post kind of admits the entire thing was a suggestion to begin with.
I will admit that the last post was a wee bit o' ragepost, and yes Dray I appoligize for dropping the F bomb on you, but I detest in a much earlier post in the same thread I had mentioned:
1) I'm not really looking to suggest it or pitch it just yet. More for discussion and feedback.
DiabloII enjoyed and still is enjoying years of non subscription based replayability even after every player that had the desire to slay hellmode Baal (tacobaalz023 woo woo) had done so. I believe having a hardcore option was if not a major, then at least a mediocre factor that contributed to this.
With the amount of complaining about no new hard content I honestly wanted to discuss and gather feedback with the players about a hardcore mode so that if and when I decided to make a suggestion post it would benifit from said discussion and be clearly outlined and detailed.
All apologies ~Luke
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 08:11
#19
One involves game updates,
One involves game updates, the other involves possibilities the players themselves can make. Events for example. For instance, you CAN play a level and get crowns or you could not go on that run; player-controlled things.
Oh derp that was dumb of me.
I actually did 'bother to read'; I understand that, I just added the parentheses bit in in case you argued that it wasn't a suggestion and instead a player-made scenario.
Wait, what? People are getting feedback before posting in the board that's supposed to be for posting feedback about feedback...?
CRITICEPTION
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 09:17
#20
Draycos
Not worth my time any longer.
I'm bored, you're confused and have resorted to worn out meme.
This is me agreeing to disagree with you. You do whatever you want.
~Luke
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 10:25
#21
...
Oh okay, i see how it is. I'm not worth the time because I misinterpreted a single thing! My entire post must be worth nothing now!! >.> But go ahead, ignore the focus of my post. Maybe I could have worded it better, sure; things impossible until the devs do something and things possible if the players do something... And wait a minute, was that last bolded comment meant for me? I didn't say that one. :/
And I didn't 'resort' to using it, it wasn't even meant to add anything to the discussion. Just another failed attempt at being humorous...
But seriously, it's best to refine an idea in the suggestions board itself, not refine it and then post it.
Edit: autocorrect made 'bolded' molded instead for some reason, hmmm.
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 10:33
#22
No that last one was me
No that last one was me quoting me from very early in the OP.
Lets just leave it alone before we both make even more of a spectacle of it, I hear gates are free today and I have been wanting to make a 5* vortex bomb to use in conjecture with my AP/Sent charges. Its wicked strong, I think the vortex spins stuff so quick it hits the bird 2-3 times.
I am sorry truley Draycos, as they say its often hard to detect sarcasm and whatnot on the internet. One of my inherent flaws is I am often uncertain if someone is trying to troll me or humor me.
~sincerely Luke
Fri, 05/18/2012 - 10:40
#23
Only the first two sentences
Only the first two sentences of that last post were meant to be sarcastic.
I guess I can agree, this doesn't seem to be going anywhere...
Try using a Fang of Vog with a vortex; the amount if damage you can do is baffling, especially using the shock vortex (shock snares enemies).
Please provide documentation to back up your claims of bias.
Otherwise, move this to Gremlin Chatter. =P