Forums › English Language Forums › General › Suggestions

Search

Lockdown NEW RULES!

5 replies [Last post]
Tue, 10/09/2012 - 14:15
Players-Guest's picture
Players-Guest

I see that vanguards enter T2 lockdown while the soldiers,knights,and knight elites cry.

It simply ruins the game,so i'm suggesting that we have ranked matchs!

If no one likes my ideas,i will graveyard this.

I'm just doing this for all the lockdown fans!{Nope,not you,Vanguards!}

Who's supporting this or not?

Tue, 10/09/2012 - 14:17
#1
Players-Guest's picture
Players-Guest
Edit

Edit:Please support!It helps all the knights.

Likes and dislikes:0-0

Tue, 10/09/2012 - 14:18
#2
Grittle's picture
Grittle
-1

Then we can have all the skolver clones make skolver alts, giving them 5* armor and weapons and trinkets while still being a soldier rank, THEN ITS WORSE PROBLEM

Tue, 10/09/2012 - 14:22
#3
Darkshaodw's picture
Darkshaodw
We gotta change the lack of

We gotta change the lack of vAriety in ld, not t3 in t2. That's too small of problem

Tue, 10/09/2012 - 14:37
#4
Addisond's picture
Addisond
I have reasons for playing t2

Yes, it damages newer players' games. But I play t2 for a few reasons -

1. More health
I like having more health and length to fights
2. Less polaris, bombers
I hate both of these weapons in LD. Bombers take no skill to remove, only time, and polaris, though fine in smaller fights, gets wayyy out of hand in t3.
3. More hammer
I don't like fighting sealed sword users. Hammer is exciting and original.
4. Less competent guardians
I absolutely despise fighting competent guardians. There's no way for a swordie to take one down without taking significant damage, they counter every hit you deal because they're immune to knockback.
5. Less players in general
I find LD much more fun when there are fewer players. Less lag, complexity is less excessive. In t2, I have newer, less field-wise players who do most of the capping, maintaining the balance and fullness of the battlefield, while I can still enjoy smaller fights.

That's it. So yeah, -1, even if it's kinda selfish, I still feel that overall the pros outweigh the cons.

Tue, 10/09/2012 - 20:22
#5
Qwez's picture
Qwez
My Experience as a T2 LD (Vanguard)

I personally do worse than good or better T2 players for some reason...

Bombers are only actually good in T3, so I am not that good in T2 during bombing plays.
When I play as a spammy gunner, I can only do so much. I can overpower people, but semi-competent players will still kill me.
When I play as a swordy, I just die ._. no clue why I suck so much now, used to be generally top damage months ago lol.

Well I guess it is because I am not one of those Trinketeer, Dusker kids running around.
I personally don't care if I play T2 or T3 because I'm going to have fun, and I generally do less damage in T3 than I do in T2 ._.

Just so you know, if this implemented, you are discriminating against the PvE SK players who suck/lag too much to play competitive T3. (T3 is competitive almost all of the time, very rarely is it chill)

This is America! You don't discrimin- nvm.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system