Simple question really: do you think its' worth it to return to base to heal as a recon? Especially on long or large maps (like Frostbite or Ramparts). Strikers cna boost back and forward if they're confident they'll make the most of it, and guardians can slowly heal up as they defend; but recons have no ability to heal and travel normally, and even slower if they stay cloaked to remain alive.
Usually I just push on ahead with low health, even if I'm relatively near the base, and continue fighting until I die anyways. This may be becasue I might be able to make more of it, since I'm gunning, but in general I'm wondering if it'd be more worth it to take me back to base and heal, even if it costs me time and usefulness in the match; I hate to think that going in with low health and getting killed quickly could have been avoided and ultimately been more productive if I was full health. Or I could die quickly anyway and have to deal with a double-trip and a death respawn...
Thoughts?
I'm a recon and I heal but here are the reasons. Sometimes, I ambush people but they end up trying to fight me so I try to turn invisible and sneak back quickly. Also with that little detector that recons have to let people figure out that a recon is there, it means I'm in big trouble. They find me easily.
The strikers have good instants, they kill me without even seeing me and if I turn invisible to leave then they end up killing me again. I used to be a recon that only captures but now I'm trying to defend bases.