- Fair enough. I did say keeping one "official" thread made sense, and I have no problem with it being this one over any others. I just think more and more duplicate threads are pointless when you have a main one to use.
Heh, the problem was just a misunderstanding then. One side defending the official thread and the other defending the need of only one official and no copies.
- The fact that they've already changed it once only serves to show that they won't be willing to change it again for some time. Who wants to sit and make a whole new bomb only for it to change within a month? Year down the line maybe, but it's still too soon for them to be even likely to considering it seriously.
It could even come as a different line instead of deleting it, as had been said on the old thread. They have pretty different mechanics for one to replace the other, although the new ones still needing tweaks/buffs.
- Because there were fifty of these threads all saying the same thing, while there's only one thread of each suggestion. The purpose of the thread itself isn't pointless; I believe heavily on making oneself heard as a community, but once there's already a main discussion, making seven new threads saying exactly the same thing is pointless. Refer to my first comment~
Thinking about it again, I was being pretty dumb, it does have a difference in the content :X Sorry about it.
Da heck? They deleted it? The thread wasn't violating any of the forum rules to the point that they should do that, and even if it was (I didn't read every post), why now? I really hope I'm missing something here, but this seems a tad Orwellian. Do allusive (though it's not an insult if you answer the question right) insults get the same pass as <69 does?