Heya there! Styrka here.
So after I stopped crying about getting robbed on a UV, I have come to terms that I'll probably make one again considering just how much crafting I make. If you've no idea what I'm talking about, that's perfectly fine.
What the topic is here is, quite simply, whether a Neutralizer or Biohazard is better. I adore the play style of sticking an enemy with a charge and then glueing them together with a Vortex bomb!! But, is it better to have pure shadow damage and a good chance to poison and languish against devilites and greavers (Shudder) Or simply take the (Slightly less powerful?) Neutralizer?
Thanks for the input and I'd love to go dungeoning with you sometime,
-Styrka
The biohazard and the neutraliser have the same base damage vs neutral creatures, and the defence debuff from the bio's poison is hardly noticeable. You will never be able to consistently (read: achieve more than once) tag gremlins with charges and detonate them, unless you sticky the whole crowd. Scorchers and knockers are the exception, but knockers are so weak that a neutra can take them down just as efficiently.
People get the catalyzer lines for the playstyle, and if you choose the biohazard you limit how much it's used by quite a bit. So unless you have a pet hate for jellies, get the neutraliser.