Forums › English Language Forums › General › Suggestions

Search

No reason for OOO to not sell all recipes in town

28 replies [Last post]
Mon, 05/09/2011 - 21:49
Pawn's picture
Pawn

At this point there is no reason for OOO to not just sell all recipes in town at a 3k-4k mark-up from the terminal Basil prices. The whole mechanic of Basil having a short list of random recipes is completely broken by trade chat being spammed nonstop by people offering a port to basil at a cost.

Am i salty about this? Yes. I don't see any reason why someone should be able to sell an infinite amount of recipes at no financial risk.

It makes absolutely no sense for OOO to not block invites to the terminal and sell the port themselves. But why sell the port? Just make all 4-5 star recipes 19k, 49k in town, and 15k, 45k if a player DOES THE WORK THEMSELVES to reach the terminal. Then the port to basil fee that players charge would be an additional crown sink to OOO if the player just buys the recipe at the 4k mark-up in town. AND players could still be able to buy recipes at the clockworks and then assume the financial investment/risk to resell in tradechat for 18k, 48k. This would be all out better than the current system where all recipes are available by allowing players to amass a wealth of crowns in essence selling recipes they don't own, at zero risk.

Or. I'd like to see them leave invite as an option at clockwork terminal, and make it cost the inviting player 4k to send an invite. Therefore still effectively allowing industrious players to buy and resell recipes.

I think it is flawed to let players sell an infinite amount of recipes at zero financial risk. And it has killed the market for buying and reselling 4-* recipes the legitimate way. How can i resell my 5* recipe when three people who don't own it has been spamming the offer to sell it the 2 hours before i ever logged on.

If all recipes are gonna be available at all times, OOO my as well be the one to pocket that 4k port fee. And we can resuscitate the market for players to resell recipes. And it will clean up trade chat, which is now AKA 'buy my list of 20 recipes i don't really own' chat.

Mon, 05/09/2011 - 22:13
#1
Eruzei's picture
Eruzei
Perhaps Terminal levels could

Perhaps Terminal levels could be locked so new people would not be able to join the group at that point. It might solve this issue.

Mon, 05/09/2011 - 22:18
#2
OnmyojiOmn
Legacy Username
They'd have to rebalance the

They'd have to rebalance the floors before Basil, because the reason the rewards are so terrible is that the reward is reaching Basil.

Mon, 05/09/2011 - 22:27
#3
Negimasonic's picture
Negimasonic
we've already been over this

we've already been over this

Same as there, I won't discuss this any more (it's all related). And despite everything I and others wrote, the most well reasoned answer to that then and even now is by x3ntaro
"If OOO thinks its bad, they will remove this in the coming patches. End of story, all done here."

Mon, 05/09/2011 - 22:39
#4
Pawn's picture
Pawn
but

I don't agree with:
Comment /thread

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 02:16
#5
cheeserito
Legacy Username
I think it's appropriate,

I think it's appropriate, when the forum rules even say that you should do some research before making a repeated thread. Also, my opinion is in the thread he posted, lol.

Edit: Getting rid of ports to Basil will NOT clean up trade chat. At all. I have literally sat in trade chat for an hour without seeing a single port to Basil. But I have seen about a hundred "WTS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Shards!!! >>>>>>>>>> Blue Shards!!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>> Other mats!!!!! PST!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>!!!!!!" Quite frankly, I'm tired of people getting so butthurt over ports to Basil, when it's not an issue at all. And what about friends/guilds? You'd only be hurting them. I can think of at least one situation where the 4k would be a hassle, too (it happened to me today, even!).

A newer player befriended one of my friends, and requested to go to Jelly King with us. But they only had enough energy for the last 4 levels, so they would receive the invite at Basil. You see, I wasn't their friend, but I was the party leader, so I had no choice but to send an invite. That would have cost me 4k, that I would NOT have been getting back. And what if I didn't have 4k to just throw at the wind? :/

Seems like the only way around that would have been to add the person to my friends so they could just join me. But if you stop being able to just port to Basil altogether, they'd either have to be invited on the level before or after Basil, without getting to see recipes that they may or may not have been interested in. Also, I don't like having people I don't know on my friends list, I don't know about you, but it would just be really tedious to have to add them, invite them, then defriend them.

EDIT #2:
I'm very disappoint in you.
"I see your point but i have to say they aren't broken. Who wants to run the 1st 3 floors anyway :) But the teleports will definitely extend how long i play this game.

Also, i think some of the recipes would be TOO rare w/out teleports. Although, as a recipe reseller i do get tired of ports to basil lol."

Sound familiar? Way to be a hypocrite. :/

Edit #3: I thought that your posts later in that thread were being facetious, tbh, as you sounded REALLY aggro over nothing, suddenly. Apparently I was wrong. Point still stands that it was completely unnecessary for you to make this thread though.

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 02:56
#6
Pawn's picture
Pawn
@ cheesorito

i made the thread because i wanted to make the thread. It's actually unnecessary to make any thread on any forum.

Anyhow, on the port issue everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and i know not everyone will agree with either side. I'm sure those who don't buy/sell recipes love the ports, those who do buy/sell recipes not so much.

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 03:29
#7
Algol-Sixty's picture
Algol-Sixty
Several comments to various

Several comments to various things in this thread:

I think it's appropriate, when the forum rules even say that you should do some research before making a repeated thread.
If OOO wants us to use the forums as a research tool, they will need to *GREATLY* improve the quality of forum software that they use. Until then, I can't really blame people for posting duplicate topics

That said, this subject really should be in Suggestions, rather than General.

"If OOO thinks its bad, they will remove this in the coming patches. End of story, all done here."
That is a horrible argument. The purpose of the of the forums is to discuss things, and let OOO understand things from a player's perspective. Things change over time, and people come up with clearer/more convincing arguments for/against things.

{...} requested to go to Jelly King with us. But they only had enough energy for the last 4 levels, so they would receive the invite at Basil.
This wouldn't have been a problem, just invite them at the start of the next floor below Basil.

My opinion: Plugging the hole of inviting people to basil wouldn't do much. Resellers would just bring up recipes and sell them, or people who need them would ask friends that make it to basil to buy them. The ability to get items before you can reach basil isn't limited to recipes, you can also have people craft them for you too. This restriction/challenge was an interesting idea, but badly thought through and badly implemented. OOO would need to do a huge number of changes to really plug the hole.

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 06:36
#8
Kaley
Just leave things as they are

I see where this suggestion is coming from and it's not unreasonable. However, just as a matter of personal preference, I'd rather not see this implemented.

I like the coordination it currently takes to get to a terminal and open it up for other people. You need a team to get there, then 2 people to agree to do it and communicate between town and terminal, plus all the buyers negotiating a price with the sellers. Of course if there were more than 2 people in the team that made it to they terminal, they'll all have to agree on how to split the profits. It's that kind of cooperation, haggling and people contact in general that makes the game interesting, and buying the recipes from an NPC vendor in town would take it all away.

I have never bought or sold terminal access myself, but I don't understand why it's frowned upon. I guess every game develops its own culture and social values and for some reason in this one selling materials or anything else is ok but selling terminal access is controversial. It shouldn't be viewed as free, easy money though; the people running this have to spend a lot of time shouting in town, inviting people, etc, which time they could have spent playing and gaining crowns and heat for items to resell.

Also, please don't close down terminal levels for joining. It's cool to be able to help friends and guildmates when you get to a terminal, and can shout out to the guild "who needs anything", and all your friends start to ask you if this or that recipe is there. Yes you could mail them the item, but what if several people want the same thing, or if the person asking for it is a new friend and you both don't know each other that well? Just leave the place open and don't make things more difficult than they need to be.

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 09:21
#9
Mohandar's picture
Mohandar
It's an MMORPG. Of course

It's an MMORPG. Of course people are going to bypass things and skip levels for the sake of optimizing, and buy what equipment they can from other players. In fact, I'd say that is the hallmark of such games- you can take your time and be left in the dust, or you can be 'competitive' and wheel and deal to get top tier gear as fast as you can. Some games attempt to restrict this by having level requirements for equipment and such, but Spiral Knights basically encourages it through the buying of CE (a game currency) with real money.

Tue, 05/10/2011 - 09:44
#10
xienwolf
Legacy Username
Only allow invites if no

Only allow invites if no players have left the elevator would be kinda nice. Then it also removes the issue of joining a party which is just about to clear a floor, effectively wasting 10 energy.

EDIT: To be clear, this change would make it so you can invite to Basil's level, but not after checking his inventory. So invites to Basil are invites to a random chance at recipe availability.

Wed, 05/11/2011 - 01:14
#11
cheeserito
Legacy Username
People need to actually think.

@ Kalielle: Thank you for existing. And actually thinking about more than just trying to profit.

@ wrs1864 : I did a search for this topic just fine. Also, sometimes just looking at the forum first will do the trick. I saw three different versions of this exact thread on the first page. There is no excuse, don't blame the software. Yes, it's not that optimized. But if you use half-decent keywords, you'd be surprised what kind of relevant results you'll get.

Also- without getting to see recipes that they may or may not have been interested in. Why are you trying to penalize a "friend" for wanting to join you? What if they wanted a recipe that that particular Basil had, that I wanted as well? Because I know your argument is going to be "Well, if they really wanted it, you could have just bought it for them!" But if you want it for yourself, you're not going to be able to get it for them. And what if you simply don't have the funding to buy them a recipe, regardless of if you want it too? What if you wanted a different recipe, so you dropped all your crowns on it? Sure, they could just mail you the 15k or whatever, and you can mail them the recipe. But doesn't that just seem a tad more tedious than simply sending them an invite so they can buy it for themselves?

And what happens when the level after Basil happens to be a treasure vault? They can't join you at that point, AND they miss out on potentially getting forge/grim sparks.

There are several instances where getting rid of Basil ports is just a huuuuuge pain in the neck. And the only people it seems to be "hurting" are those who think reselling recipes for profit is a more legitimate profession. "Oh, the fact that we bought a recipe from Basil to come back and sell it in town makes us better than people who just sit around in a Basil terminal all day!" "Our spam in trade chat is actually justified because we had to pay for this recipe!"

I'm quite tired of this malarky. And as someone pointed out somewhere, the people selling ports are actually helping the economy by providing a virtually unlimited crown sink.

Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:19
#12
Pawn's picture
Pawn
but Cheesy

Wait, i'm confused, you think the hearthstone pendant is an exploit that shouldn't be used/taken advantage of, but you think it's perfectly fine to invite a player to a treasure vault and get free tokens? That's strange. Do these people have a moral obligation to not sell anything purchased from these unearned tokens????

And yes, i think it is more legitimate to buy and resell. What's if all equipment was available at specialized vendors, and everyone just sold ports and no one could sell anything they had invest time or energy (figuratively or literally) on profits. Well, i suppose it would be better because it would be a consistent crown sink!!! Or maybe not.

Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:39
#13
Hassohappa
Legacy Username
If you are that burnt up

If you are that burnt up about people selling ports you could always just buy their port, go solo, and then start selling ports of your own for less or giving them away to ensure that they don't get anything out of it!

Wed, 05/11/2011 - 13:07
#14
cheeserito
Legacy Username
I swear, everyone on the

I swear, everyone on the forums need to learn how to read. When did I ever say it was "perfectly fine" to invite people to a treasure vault? I didn't, that's when. People said that if it's such an issue to invite them at Basil, then just invite them on the floor after Basil. But if it's a treasure vault, then you simply CANNOT invite them. And I'm PERFECTLY FINE with not being able to invite people. It would be stupid if we could invite people on treasure vault, especially with the go solo function. It would be just like the love puppy exploit! But the whole point of inviting at Basil would be so that they had the opportunity to either go into a graveyard or a treasure vault. You can still invite in a graveyard, but if it's a treasure vault, that friend you promised to invite on the floor after Basil is SOL, and they don't get to partake in the treasure that they would have been able to get had you been able to invite them at Basil instead.

" Do these people have a moral obligation to not sell anything purchased from these unearned tokens????" This question doesn't even make sense. Do you actually think that people can be invited in Treasure Vaults? Is that what you're saying? Like, oh, they didn't earn those treasure vault tokens because they were just invited to it? Because you can't actually invite people on those floors. So your stupid question is stupid.

Then maybe you shouldn't resell recipes. It's OBVIOUSLY just a waste of time and money. :/ It's more of a dying profession, rather than a more legitimate profession. What are you doing to help the economy? Absolutely NOTHING. FYI. Port sellers are helping Three Rings too, because often time people who port to Basil are like "Hang on, I gotta sell energy to get the crowns to buy the recipe lol" and that means more energy sales in general (which also helps the economy of the game, BTW!).

Wed, 05/11/2011 - 13:13
#15
ajericho
Legacy Username
Port sellers are helping

Port sellers are helping Three Rings too, because often time people who port to Basil are like "Hang on, I gotta sell energy to get the crowns to buy the recipe lol" and that means more energy sales in general (which also helps the economy of the game, BTW!).

Word. Basil doesn't accept CE as payment, thereby making people dump energy into the market for crowns. More energy dumping, the price goes down, and as far as I'm concerned, everybody wins. Except the people trying to game the energy market, possibly.

Wed, 05/11/2011 - 15:29
#16
Pawn's picture
Pawn
I'm done with you

@cheesorito,
Every time you open your mouth it's just to show off your s*** attitude.

Wed, 05/11/2011 - 18:48
#17
Hazel's picture
Hazel
People who make suggestions

People who make suggestions based on personal butthurt are funny.

Economically, Basil ports are a fantastic idea. Thematically, Basil ports are a fantastic idea. Socially, Basil ports are a fantastic idea.

The only people who dislike Basil ports are whiny little jerkwads that want to be able to crank out a massive inflation on reselling recipes, but are getting out-competed by Basil port sellers who offer infinitely more without the jackassery.

Wed, 05/11/2011 - 21:28
#18
Pawn's picture
Pawn
@ Hazel

@ Hazel,
recipe resells market value= get a 1k markup on 2 star (which is not effected by basil ports), 1.5k mark-up on 3 star (which is not effected by basil ports). I.e. i've never seen a t2 port offered.
4-star recipe=17k (2k markup), and 5 star recipe is 48k (3k markup).
Ports are rarely sold for as little as 2k or 3k. The "inflation" on a port is higher than on a resell. Do your homework.

You have no way to know if "economically they are a fantastic idea". You have an opinion based on you opinion.

Once again you said something stupid. Almost every time you post it something miserable, stupid, and offensive. And usually, just like here, you are wrong. Discuss.
Congratulations, keeping the streak alive...still.

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 07:55
#19
Kaybol
Legacy Username
This thread is a solution

This thread is a solution looking for a problem...

And how does every other discussion turn into a debate over what's good/bad for the economy :P sheesh.

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 21:35
#20
cheeserito
Legacy Username
Jeburk, you're done with yourself.

Everything I said holds truth, everything you've said shows that you're nothing but a whiny jerkwad, as Hazel put it. You're clearly not realizing that what you're doing is hurting the economy, and what port sellers are doing is helping.

[edit]I've seen ports advertised for 2-3k. I've even seen people offering ports for FREE. :/ Occasionally I'll see people wanting to sell them for 5k, and that's usually only if they have really sought after recipes. I've also seen Tier 2 ports being advertised, but they are significantly less popular because Tier 3 is so much harder to get into. So maybe you should do your homework before telling others what to do.

And quite frankly, all you said to Hazel was your own s***** attitude. What Hazel said was actually intelligent, you just seem too idiotic to notice.

Having an opinion based on one's own opinion also doesn't make much sense. So stop being butthurt and learn yourself a book.

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 17:39
#21
Pawn's picture
Pawn
Nice use of Caps for emphasis :/

"I've ONLY seen ports advertised for 2-3k. I've even seen people offering ports for FREE. :/ Occasionally I'll see people wanting to sell them for 5k."

I stopped reading after this line of idiocy. I think this sums up all of your arguments nicely.

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 17:56
#22
Tisiphone's picture
Tisiphone
I admit, I'm an avid portal seller

When I'm bored or in class at school, I do a quick Moorlight -> Basil D23 Run. If I find any recipes that tend to sell well, I'll sit there.
I keep the party options Allow Guild and Allow Friend open. This usually is because when I'm at D23, I'm usually in Vanaduke's gate. Destroyer loves using me as a shortcut for his Citadel runs.
While that's going, I get Sentiment into haven, copy the list of good recipes, and start charging 50ce a teleport. When I'm feeling generous, 25ce a go. I do spam it on channel 2. Once I get a buyer, I input his name in the warp list. If they really want, I'd take 25ce up front and 25ce after.
If the buyer really doesn't trust me, I'd pay out of my own pocket, and sell it to him with a finder's fee after mailing it to Sentiment. Big wahoo, it's the same thing. Honestly, people could just use "Go Solo" to take the gate for their own and sell it.

Recipe dives are one of the drives for dungeoning. The thrill of braving the depths, and raging at Basil when he doesn't have the recipes. If you simply have all the recipes sell in one big wahoo, wouldn't that completely kill the point of Basil?

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 20:52
#23
cheeserito
Legacy Username
Jeburk

How is stating facts idiocy? I'm pretty sure you're mentally handicapped at this point. Why don't you grow up? Would you rather I bold things for emphasis? Or how about italicize? You're getting really butthurt over the truth now, and that makes you seem like you're not even 12 yet.

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 21:02
#24
Pawn's picture
Pawn
So the facts are

So the facts are you have ONLY seen it for 2-3k.
And another fact is you have occasionally seen it for 5k.

Those can't both be facts. One excludes the other. That was the idiocy.

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 21:08
#25
Deslare
Legacy Username
""I've ONLY seen ports

""I've ONLY seen ports advertised for 2-3k. I've even seen people offering ports for FREE. :/ Occasionally I'll see people wanting to sell them for 5k."

I stopped reading after this line of idiocy. I think this sums up all of your arguments nicely."

What the Christ? This isn't even taken out of context, it's your entire post and I don't even, I can't even.

I think I see where you're coming from, by the wording that sentence is contradictory, but it took me a bit to catch it - maybe because I'm not intent on nit-picking someone's wording. Even so, you didn't really say anything at all with your post. No statement was made with your words - just an attempt to exploit one's slip-up to try to discredit them. Seems to me that you're frustrated, defensive, and trying to take potshots because people disagree with you, and have good reasons for it.

All of this talk about restricting invites on Basil Ports is only trying to hurt the common playerbase, people who want to play with their friends and guildies.

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 21:37
#26
cheeserito
Legacy Username
Wow, yeh, you are really

Wow, yeh, you are really nitpicky. I fixed it, are you happy now? :/

I think the fact that you supposedly stopped reading because I made a minor mistake makes you look more like an idiot than me.

In any case, locking Basil terminals is, and always will be, a dumb idea.

/thread.

Thu, 05/12/2011 - 22:53
#27
Pawn's picture
Pawn
lol

everyone knows i read the whole thing :)
locking basil being good/bad is an opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Fri, 05/13/2011 - 03:31
#28
Kaybol
Legacy Username
@jeburk

You've conveniently ignored me 3x already, so I'll ask you straight up: which problem is this supposed to fix?

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system