Forums › English Language Forums › General › General Discussion

Search

Old LD vs New LD?

34 replies [Last post]
Sun, 05/19/2013 - 07:38
Dragneel-Wiki's picture
Dragneel-Wiki

Note1: This is NOT a flammable thread by any means. Make it so, and I assure you that you will regret it.
Note2: Note1 isn't to be taken seriously...
_____________________________________________

So I've been listening to some people saying that the first generation of bright LDers is not, by any means, stronger than the current generation. They refer this to the fact that LD playstyles, techniques and even players themselves have improved drastically. Thus, I wanted to see what forumers say about this. Is it really true that there is a big margin between the new and old LD players in terms of skill? And if so, what reasons can you give for?

Oh, and a second question. What if we gathered the best LD players currently, put them in the same team, train them together to gain decent chemistry and let them fight against "Finesse - The Strongest LD Guild according to many people in the past.", who would win? Or... Winning doesn't really matter, but who would perform better?

_____________________________________________

~Dragneel

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 08:18
#1
Misten's picture
Misten
Who cares, next generation of

Who cares, next generation of LD is coming soon. Now and past would be obsolete.

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 08:26
#2
Feyi-Feyi's picture
Feyi-Feyi
My 2 cents

I'm too much of a nub to have played the old LD but I have watched some videos.
Imo, the current generation is better. Mind you: current generation of LD, not current generation of players.
Why? Ld has become much faster in terms of game tempo.
Every striker has a gun now, everyone has trinkets now, everyone has UV's now. It's a higher level overall, and players had to adapt to it.

Feyi

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 08:53
#3
Little-Juances's picture
Little-Juances

Single UVs, no bomb radius indicator, less Skolver clones, RSS.
I miss the old LD.

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 09:17
#4
Icegill's picture
Icegill
Boom!

History lesson!

*not everything is accurate as I left for 7 months right after the initial release of LD*

The current generation of Lockdown is actually better than the previous generation. This is just in general, everyone counts. Though, if you gathered the greatest LD players of this generation and put them up against the greatest LD players of the previous generation, the previous generation would absolutely wreck this generation. Why?

This generation has not only complicated the simple loadouts of the past but there are so many play styles that players who use them tend to be unorganized and more prone to make a mistake. You know how everyone has the same old boring loadout now? FF/BTB, GF/DA, Polaris or Valiance. Back then the common loadout consisted of antigua line, DA/GF, leviathan and the flourish line. Not much of a difference but if you look into skill, it's completely different.

Today, players usually follow the combination of swinging your flourish and/or GF and firing a bullet from your valiance to freeze the player > repeat. Back then, the top players used this format. Months of this and people thought to copy the top players back then which quickly spread the use of this play style. When the play style spread, the top players once again changed and sought to counter this play style (brandish). Then once again someone copied and it spread. It's a cycle that still continues today.

Too complicated? No. I remember myself being a levithan charger. I grew a brain and started using a DA/AP combination. There are many players that follow the play styles of all the "great" LD players today. As Misten said, tier 2 right now is filled with a lot of talent and I can't wait to see them in tier 3.

To your finesse question, we would win. Our strategy will probably be better than theres. Individually they are flourish masters but I doubt they could compete with combinations used today. I don't entirely agree that finesse was the greatest either, they split up after their golden age and many of them joined other good guilds at the time (Reign of Chaos, Order of Venus, Knightmare, Apathy, etc.) I guess during their golden age, they were the best so yeah. Again, not all accurate, people told me these stories and I might have butchered it a little bit (probably a lot).

Hope this helped!

Fun facts
- Valiance was never used back then! AP was much more common.
- Brandish was never used but that was pre-patch boosting the brandish's damage.
- I believe there were more vog cubs than skolvers back then, ASI was considered the best.
- Jempire was not the most known guild!

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 09:17
#5
Dragneel-Wiki's picture
Dragneel-Wiki

@Little-Juances:
There was no bomb indicator? I wonder how hard it was to kill a bomber...
Less Skolvers? Suppose not....

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 09:43
#6
Krakob's picture
Krakob
What's an old LD?

Like, what has changed if we consider the actual game and not the metagame?

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 10:36
#7
Our-Little-Ajo
Being objective

I've been in all LD generations, from the true beggining when scores/damage tables was in just one dark blue color, until the last big update, when points and matches duration change (Allowing more damage per game).

Leaving AT aside (is been an issue since the beggining), I agree in most parts with Icegill, past generation have no chance against new players.

Finnesse were great players back then, because they were one of a few guilds with health trinkets and UVs, back then only welthy players could afford a 3* health trinket (1.2mill each). Old generation "good players" tend to abbuse of 3 hit FF combo (Chris, Exile, Hetero) and only a few dominate the dance of death (Me, Sciaz, Cordiceps, Turbocoke).

After the trinkets patch, Finnese dissapear for obvious reasons (They loose all advantage due gear)

Don't remember if UVs came first than trinkets, but both things change LD in a great way.

Then the brandish crap, I remember Deogee was the first player using that weapon. Saddly that weapon is only worth it if you use AT, without it is crap.

Now, as far as I know, we have a new generation comming with shield features, that for sure will allow players new ways of fighting.

And don't forget we will have pokemons... so 2 big changes will come in less than 3 months.

There are no good guilds to compare against Finnese, because all guilds tend to abuse of different non-competitive features (AT, ce rez, polaris, etc).

---------------------
FOR THE RECORD
---------------------

In BETA SERVER for the beggining of LD, OOO REMOVE the AT from LD, but P2P players cry about it in their test forum, and OOO HAD to add it again because that cause a big flood of tears.

So Contri.. thanks Chris / Knightmare / Finnesse / Jemps for the unlimited spam of brandish/flourish/valiance/GF/DA/alchemers in Lockdown.

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 10:40
#8
Canozo's picture
Canozo

Remember that the first generation of lockdown didnt have Heart pendants, the Finesse A team had every single player with heart pendants and UVs, thats why they were invencible.

Id say that the current generation of LD is way stronger in so many levels than the other one, Finesse A Team would get dominated by EoS/Rig/Jemp/Ultra A teams nowdays.

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 13:45
#9
Icegill's picture
Icegill
Boom!

@Canozo: Correct! The heart trinkets were only availible from love puppies or otherwise - EXTREMELY RARE.

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 13:58
#10
Neodasus's picture
Neodasus
New meta is always stronger

New meta is always stronger than old meta. They took what we had and made it better. Who new brandish would raise the skill ceiling for PvP? None of us thought brandish was any good until players started using them in the way that they are now (very, very precise weapon)

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 17:28
#11
Klipik's picture
Klipik

I feel like I got left behind in the "old LD". :(

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 18:06
#12
Bert-Banana's picture
Bert-Banana
.

I wish I could re-live the old LD, back when Whitelancer made that 1v1 competition that was never finished, when Chris and Magnus would always go at it, when everyone would die in two hits. And almost no lag

And the best thing is, everything was much more mellow and never any complaints when someone died. (AA, Polaris, Combo spam)

Just talking about it makes me upset on how this game transformed into what it is today.

Sun, 05/19/2013 - 18:10
#13
Blue-Flood's picture
Blue-Flood
!

I gota say being mostly a ftp player, the time between then and now has allowed me to make more gear and roll for UVs. Mixing it up with striker bomber, various recon loadouts etc.

I tried umbra only for a few games and barely managed to get a few caps/defends and around 10k dmg. More players with asi= higher ghost range and harder to dodge. Just gota adapt :)

Mon, 05/20/2013 - 00:26
#14
Zen-Neth's picture
Zen-Neth
just some random persons opnion :3

hi all! just a passing random person to give there opinion on this hypothetical situation that will most likely never happen :3!

so yea firstly i think that this is a pretty hard question to answer as to actually say how someone in the past would do compared to someone who is currently of this generation would have to be measured by there ability to adapt with in a matter of short span of time which would exclude a number of people that learn to specialize at one technique of play or certain style that has been lost due to things like weapon changes and the addition of heart trinkets
plus you'd have to think of what defines who is best in your own mind as one person's opinion of best could differ drastically from another person's reasoning of who is best and if you really wanted to find the statistical "best" you'd pretty much have to strip everyone of there uv's and everyone of there trinkets and have them dual which still has a major flaw of it being a fight of one persons style vs another persons style and how one style could have an advantage over another persons style of play simply because the gear's base stats are higher in one persons way of play vs another persons

but anyways since whats above rarely matters since a very skilled player can probably find a way to beat a not as skilled player who's using a play style with an upper hand to it through holes in their style and other tendencies that leave room for error.

i personally would think that the newer generation would win simply because of the amount of time that was allotted to them to figure out what works best, and also gunners i remember when gunners first started becoming popular it was a huge problem for many people and if you had a good gunner on your team it would just be alot of people charging to their deaths me being one of them haha ^ ^! But i will say that the older generation actually still might win despite their disadvantage my reasoning for this is probably because of carelessness from the newer players because without trinkets some styles that people use in ld now simply fall apart in the face of a good flourisher that can completely shut down peoples movements ah but thats all ill say! :3

ah also i would like to mention that
1) even back when lockdown first started till its update into the new generation there was definitely complaining of course not as much because everyone was new at first and also it was new content that people could do when they where bored or because of the recipes and stuff you could get with krogomo coins so yea there was still complaining lol one of the biggest ones was the flourish because it only took two hits to kill everyone

2) finding best ld players from across any generation is pretty hard i mean there are famous ld players but that doesnt mean they are the best in fact some of the best ld players could be a person that has never played ld or just played ld once got bored and went to do something else or even just don't like having publicity

ok im done...and yea i know my writing skills are completely horrible and if it ticks you off i'm sorry ok T^T and if you plan to waste your time going off topic and belittling it well then good for you! because it probably did absolutely nothing except hurt my feelings...but anyways if you did read through all of this and are still partially sane! then thanks for reading just a simple insignificant persons post!

p.s. definitely not a person anyone of you knows! <.< >.> ah but i am an alt but you know much easier to create an alt and log in on that then through steam! wait is it? hmm oh well! wheeee and sorry for the long post zen-neth tends to get side tracked HERP

Mon, 05/20/2013 - 02:31
#15
Dragneel-Wiki's picture
Dragneel-Wiki

@Icegill:

I love History! :3
Thanks for your useful post.

@Klipik:

So you are an old LDer? :o

@Snarkey:

Unfortunately, I can't speak about old LD myself. Mainly because I had no proper gear (Clone) for it, and always got pawned by others. But yeah, the LD community is way toxic lately. It doesn't take a lot of work to make someone rage and curse all your family and their ancestors. But the worst thing in LD, and the thing that makes all these freaking problems is the eternal enemy of all PC-Gamers: The Devilish Lag.

@Zen-Neth:

Thank you for your reply too!
Apparently, I am still sane after reading your post, do I get a prize? :D

@Others:

Thanks for your interest. ^_^

Mon, 05/20/2013 - 02:45
#16
Bleyken's picture
Bleyken

@Snarkey Almost no lag!?????!!?? Almost no lag for US players only!

New generation is better.

Mon, 05/20/2013 - 15:38
#17
Klipik's picture
Klipik
@Drag

I've been playing SK since it launched on steam. I have the Spiral Bombhead mask from the BN launch promo event. I have played LD since the day it was released. I was in Lockdown Loons. Yes, I would say I am an old LDer.

(not so much T3 though.)

Tue, 05/21/2013 - 04:16
#18
Hadn's picture
Hadn
Just a poke.

Finesse members either quit or joined Apathy, they may have gone to sub in for other guilds a couple of times but Apathy was our guild. Although now it seems that EoS has picked up the majority of the few remaining people that still play Lockdown.

@Feller - Finesse died due to being a guild that consisted of around 20 players which after having many of the core players quitting due to school / a dry patch of no content / no guilds willing to play against us (It was the only thing other than FSC that we did), it left a huge gap in our ranks. We didn't disband due to a lack gear advantage.

No question though that new LD guilds would beat the older generations, there is a huge amount of different playstyles now that I doubt they'd be able to keep up with. I'm sure the term "Skolver clone" will eventually be replaced with "Chaos clone" because as Icegill said, playstyles spread and the number of chaos sets is growing.

Dash 'n' bash will be interesting to say the least.

Tue, 05/21/2013 - 07:10
#19
Canine-Vladmir's picture
Canine-Vladmir
um....i think I know the answer

Old LD
Back when Lockdown was introduced, most of us didnt know what to do so what we did was Learn the Rules and Play the Objective. And most gear and weapons weren't "found" to be OP (No one used FF, Skolver, Striker Kit, etc just yet). Lockdown was actually fun becuase we really didnt know what we were doing.
The teams were diverse; Strikers would team up with Guardians, Guardians would team up together, and the Recon were actually the "solo" players who would cap on the other side of the map.
Oh yea, and "pro" players would brag about their caps.

New LD
Most of us already discovered cheat-cheat weapons. We enjoy killing noobs for free damage. We make fun of new LD players. We care more about damage than PTO. We value HP trinkets over everything else. Everybody wears striker/skolver. We hate teamwork. Theres only a handful of LD players who truly have fun and is a teamplayer.

Is this what you wanted?

Tue, 05/21/2013 - 08:48
#20
Fehzor's picture
Fehzor

I remember that! I did go back and was delighted to see more play styles... still no use for about half the gear in the game, but it is progress I suppose.

Tue, 05/21/2013 - 15:18
#21
Mzculet's picture
Mzculet
In my opinion the old LD

In my opinion the old LD players had pure skills the new LD players just take advantage of the weapon spamming/Unique variant rolling.

Dont get me wrong now. Im not saying all LD players spam and Roll uvs to get the better hand. Im just saying MOST

Tue, 05/21/2013 - 15:19
#22
Aveond's picture
Aveond
I know what'll make the new

I know what'll make the new kids rage: remove Striker for 3-5 days! That'll get them in a tizzy in no time.

Tue, 05/21/2013 - 17:33
#23
Klipik's picture
Klipik

That would be fun.

Tue, 05/21/2013 - 18:21
#24
Randomzz's picture
Randomzz

The problem with comparing is not only strategy/loadout/heart pendant/uv changes, but also how mechanics within LD have changed. ie when LD first came out good guardians could be a big problem, and not a speed bump as they are now after getting nerfed again and again.

But in terms of:
weapon strategy- new
skill- old (not counting people like finesse that essentially were p2w)
loadouts- tie (yes, you may argue current combos more effective than older ones, but think back to before you could have vh UV's on everything and they used their set bonuses better than imo the current LD does theirs, and ended up with close to the same stats)

Wed, 05/22/2013 - 02:23
#25
Dendios's picture
Dendios

@Klipik:

So you are an Ojisan. :D

@Hadn:

Now I wish I was able to fight against Apathy/Finesse, but guess I messed the train.

@Canine-Vladmir:

I greatly disagree with you. How do you consider a weapon a "Cheat-Cheat" just because it's powerful? Does that make most weapons "Cheat-Cheat"? And your statement about "We make fun of new players", it's kinda false. What annoys me in "New LD" is the T2 Newbies that jump into T3 LD just because they have an freaking Avenger, and they ruin the game in most cases. (There are some T2 players who are awesome in T3)

@Night-Rove:

Pure skill? Hmm... I don't think combo-spamming was a skillful feat, right? I suppose that few LDers used the first attack only of Flourish lines.

@Avenod:

Then everyone will switch to the FREAKING BUGGED RECON CLASS WHICH EVERYONE IS IGNORING IT BUGS.

Sun, 06/09/2013 - 07:04
#26
Troololol
If you speak to the Finesse

If you speak to the Finesse players themselves, you would know that they are required to not only win the guild matches but to utterly dominate it that accurately reflects the advantages they have. More than anyone else, they are aware of the superiority of their gears over their opponents. To illustrate an example 900 - 150 can be a bad score for them.

Nothing in this thread shows why these old players can be beaten when most of them went over to other competitive games that have a much higher skill ceiling. Games that are played competitively internationally. Most posters are rather naive which is why they will always only be big fish in a small pond, absolutely zero tactical knowledge for both PvP and PvE.

Sun, 06/09/2013 - 07:37
#27
Klipik-Forum's picture
Klipik-Forum

But we're not talking about CS or LoL or SCII or wherever they went. We're talking about SK. And I would love to see an actual organized guild with a real strategy come back and beat all the top guilds into the ground.

Sun, 06/09/2013 - 17:01
#28
Troololol
That has already been done if

That has already been done if you were there to witness them, Finesse is just so secretive in their recruitment they didn't want people who has potential to leave the guild to join them. Skills and Wealth has no bearing to get you inside that guild, you need to fit their culture which is ridiculously demanding. I don't remember Finesse has send field their A team once. At their peak, they have around 20 plus members and pretty much everyone in that guild play LD. The only catch is the composition of the team they send has to be sufficient to guarantee a win against anyone on that day.

Nobody really likes to play against them because they have a good sense of what is needed to win. It is undeniable arrogance. They have play matches where they went trinketless and all kind of restrictions. Regardless, Finesse is not the be all and end all of Lock Down. They are there because besides of gears, they took a lot of initiatives unseen by the mainstream audience in Lock Down. By now, Jempire should have done the same thing.

Sun, 06/09/2013 - 17:18
#29
Little-Juances's picture
Little-Juances

t's a game. What's the ultimate point of a game? Having fun.

The 'pros' can yell at noobs for having AA on, spamming, always using the same clone gear, etc.
But in the end, that noob that doesn't give a [...] is having more fun than you.

When you take it too seerusly it stops being a game, and that pressure to win and be perfect becomes unhealty.

Sun, 06/09/2013 - 18:01
#30
Autisylveon's picture
Autisylveon
I HAVE A VERY AWESOME GUILD!!!!

Yeah, pretty much, i got promoted to officer and im proud of it. =)
and im seriously annoyed when people say SPAM or maybe AA or whatever so i agree with you little-juances (just sayin)

=) happy spiral knighting everyone

T2 LD is da best!!!!

Sun, 06/09/2013 - 18:02
#31
Icegill's picture
Icegill
Boom!

@Juances: No. Why can't someone be good AND have fun? Who says if someone is pro, they HAVE to be a yelling, dull and angry person?

I call falsification to your statement!

Sun, 06/09/2013 - 21:06
#32
Klipik-Forum's picture
Klipik-Forum

@Juances: Having fun is okay. Having gun is actually good. But having fun at the expense of both your teammates and opponents who are trying to play the game seriously and have fun in their own way is not okay. Let's take LoL as an example, another objective-based team game many people take "too seriously". You know what happens if your way of having fun in that game is detremental to your team in some way (playing a tank as support, jungler as AD carry, w/e (I have no idea how to play LoL, lol))? You get vote kicked by your teammates. Same thing applies in SK. Just because AA hammer spamming and filling the screen with balls of electric death is your idea of "fun" does not mean it's okay for you to do if the entire other team (and sometimes your team too) is yelling and swearing at you for using a play style that requires minimal skill for a maximum effect. Essentially, you're trolling at that point.

Sun, 06/09/2013 - 23:55
#33
Troololol
There are people who focus

There are people who focus more on PvE and are less skilled in Lock Down in Finesse. The numbers are enough to form a team which would be beaten with more or less a 50% rate by the A team of the other top guild. That is how we beat them. The difference is it will never happen because you will always see 2-4 veterans in that team. That is enough to sweep everyone else in Guild Matches. This is why you never see the A team from Finesse, it was never needed. If Gianfri is still playing, he will be able to elaborate on this.

Pubstars will never realize the most important thing in Lock Down isn't individual skill. Just like in MOBA, you will see them excited to face TPA.Toyz in LoL, iG.Ferrari_430 in Dota and try to evaluate themselves against them. It is a team game, guild vs guild matches requires different sets of skill to succeed. The unfortunate thing is this thread reflects that mentality. Small fry will always be small fry.

Mon, 06/10/2013 - 00:35
#34
Master-User's picture
Master-User
I agree icegill.

You can be good and have fun. I pwn as a proto which is very fun for me and I'm quite good at it :3

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system