Maybe if you just unequipped your shield and had 2 swords equipped you could just have 2 and right and left click to use them both, you charge attack could be different or same it doesn't really matter.
Duel Wielding
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 00:06
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 01:07
#2
How can you end without a beginning?
Restrain yourself, Skye. Remember to restrain...
I'll comment in the "nicest" way possible.
No. Because:
1.) This suggestion has been posted several times and only a few have been considered.
2.) Polaris + Polaris. Blitz + Blitz. Get it? EDIT: Also, Swords? Troika + Troika. WRH + WRH. Bombs? Not really good-looking.
3.) No details except, "Maybe if you just unequipped your shield and had 2 swords equipped you could just have 2 and right and left click to use them both, you charge attack could be different or same it doesn't really matter.". One sentence? How could we even--
@Coely - Lol.
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 02:27
#3
this thing again
I'm a bit pissed off cause of the update so I'll be rude.
what skye said.
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 05:07
#4
Dual super charges would give you an unnecesary amount of damage, you're losing your shield for nothing.
If a trojan already dies by a single blitz, why would you need 2?
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 07:09
#5
@Skye-Lightning
This suggestion has been posted several times
Understatement of the year.
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 07:15
#6
@Hexzyle
Understatement of the year.
Yes.
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 07:42
#7
"This suggestion has been posted several times"
...this month.
http://wiki.spiralknights.com/Suggestions_Forums_guide
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aforums.spiralknights.com+dual+wie...
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 08:39
#8
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 08:43
#9
I'm tired of these people. Oh so tired.
durble post
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 09:15
#10
broken link...
Waffle, y u mean :(
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 09:27
#11
-1
Why do we need dual-wield weapons?
You would also look pretty stupid. Think about a 3-swing combo with a flourish, now imagine that with 1 flourish in each hand.
If you were going to make dual-wield weapons, then it would be OP, so you would have to balance the weapons to half the amount of damage per weapon, which would be pointless.
How come barely anyone comes up with anything different or creative nowadays?
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 10:07
#12
@Klipik-Forum
Because klipik, these people fill me with anger. Something I dislike. So I then instead of taking it out on people I actually care about latter instead I take it out on the source.
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 11:04
#13
Welcome to the forums Captainsloth! Now don't suggest dual wielding ever again.
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 13:28
#14
Agreed ^
@Waffle: But it's like the first time for all of the people who suggest it... And then you go and snap at them :(
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 16:03
#15
Well, if I place muself in Waffle's shoes, I guess I would be the same.
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 19:09
#16
Lawls
Did anyone else notice that the knight in the background of the new combat abilities announcement picture is dual wielding a Hot Edge and Zapper?
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 19:54
#17
Your point is?
Did anyone else notice that Optimus Prime dual wields Divine Avengers?
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 20:00
#18
Lulz
Did anyone else notice that the only person willing to put time into this overused, overstated idea was potato?
Sat, 07/06/2013 - 23:14
#19
@Coely
I think that "hot edge" is actually just his other hand..
Sun, 07/07/2013 - 00:19
#20
@Klipik
The dude stabs with his FoV as if it were a flourish.
Sun, 07/07/2013 - 04:49
#21
@Gzilla
Did anyone else notice that the only person willing to put time into this overused, overstated idea was potato?
No. It was a sloth. The captain of it's kind, actually.
Sun, 07/07/2013 - 07:24
#22
@Gzilla
What about Skye?
Also, what wrong with me saying why I dislike an idea?
If I made a thread and people literally just put -1, I'd wanna know why.
Also, it took no more than 1 minute of my time to type.
Sun, 07/07/2013 - 09:09
#23
@Potato
Just saying how a lot of other people here have dealt with the same poorly planned idea that just practically states "I want dual wielding" without any sort of idea. Good for you guys for actually explaining it to sloth, forum vets are fed up with the same ideas being brought up every 3 days.
Sun, 07/07/2013 - 09:51
#24
you people just won't let it die
why the cog are you people still posting in this thread. Just let it die already we all know it is bad.
Mon, 07/08/2013 - 03:23
#25
Somehow I have this urge to annoy Waffle by commenting.
Mon, 07/08/2013 - 03:47
#26
That wonderful Smile is gone for Eternity
Dual wielding WOULD work... if it was an individual weapon type. I think Fehzor has covered that, though.
Thu, 07/11/2013 - 17:40
#27
-2
*Irony on* Ooh Dual wielding?! Whats next? Super gluing 2 guns together? Oh oh! I know!, lets make gremlins dual wield now! Since its about dual wielding, right???
*Irony off* JK! Dual wielding would make it overpowered, and it wouldn't look good. And besides, dual wielding at the cost of your shield is basically asking to remove one of your only means, of completely withstanding damage with an object.
.