Forums › English Language Forums › General › Suggestions

Search

New kind of Weapons

11 replies [Last post]
Sun, 07/07/2013 - 06:49
Recon-Knight-User

Dear SK

Well i will get straight to the theme,since there are swords and shields and armor in the game,it reminds me of Medieval Times,so why wouldnt there be Bows or something like that too,for example Blaster Bows.I wish someone reads this and supports it and maybe see it in the game. :)

Sun, 07/07/2013 - 06:58
#1
Little-Juances's picture
Little-Juances

Besides the looks, what's the difference between a bow and a gun?

Guns use one hand, shield in the other. But you neeed both to use a bow. It'll look weird.

Sun, 07/07/2013 - 07:06
#2
Klipik-Forum's picture
Klipik-Forum
@Juances

Not really, since you can't shield and use the weapon at the same time anyway. You could hold it in one hand, facing down while shielding or running, then the shield could move to the back slot and the player could hold the weapon with two hands while firing. But yes, they should just be classified as guns.

P.S: Also this.

+.75

Sun, 07/07/2013 - 08:21
#3
Waffleconecake's picture
Waffleconecake
this again

cross bows would make more seance then a bow seeing how we could do the whole, load several into firing clip thing. Either way -1 not needed.

Thu, 08/15/2013 - 01:54
#4
Mtax's picture
Mtax

{post deleted}

Sun, 07/07/2013 - 09:38
#5
Ink-Incorporated's picture
Ink-Incorporated

Mtax, you do realize that calling someone a r word just because you disagree with their suggestion is reportable, right?

It's filtered in-game, and you can't insult.

Critiquing and disagreeing is okay, but insults can get you reported.

Sun, 07/07/2013 - 09:51
#6
Waffleconecake's picture
Waffleconecake
lols

I would be fine with mtax's rude langue personally if he bothered to actually express this discretion with this suggestion instead of simply using a singular reply that sheds no light on why he doesn't like this idea.

Sun, 07/07/2013 - 10:05
#7
Hexzyle's picture
Hexzyle

^

Fri, 07/12/2013 - 02:06
#8
Recon-Knight-User
Description

So your answer is no,but i will tell you how i thought about it.There are 2 ways you could choose,1)put the shield at the back and fire so the knight is undefended but would deal More damage or 2)have the shield on the hand like just standing on it because when shields were created they had something not like a rope,(im sorry but i dont know so good english) but something that helped them carry them because they were too heavy so it would be something like that,i would like to reconsider it and tell me your opinion and please i dont want any insults like Mr Mtax only a yes or no with any opinions of yours if the answer will be no then i will accept your decision and close the subject there...

Fri, 07/12/2013 - 09:48
#9
Klipik-Forum's picture
Klipik-Forum

The problem with the shield being on the arm is that it would cause clipping issues with larger shields.

Sat, 07/13/2013 - 00:14
#10
Hexzyle's picture
Hexzyle
@Klipik-Forum

The problem with the shield being on the arm is that it would cause clipping issues with larger shields.

Judging by how some of the current 5 star weapons look, I don't think this is such a big issue.

Sat, 07/13/2013 - 07:22
#11
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer

Clipping isn't an issue.

In order to make it a new "kind" of weapon, it would have to have different mechanics. It would be simply this: hold down the attack button to ready the bow, hold down the shield button to draw it, then release one or the other (or both) to fire it

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system