As usual, I joined a party to do an FSC run, as I wanted to not only farm crowns and tokens, but I also wanted to heat my Ancient Plate shield. During the 1st and 2nd depth, I was having an argument with Demi-Gode, who was using an Volcanic Plate shield at the time. In the end, I got booted from the party due to the argument, so I'm here to share my anger today.
To me, I felt that Ancient gives more normal defense, despite the lack of Fire resistance, compared to Volcanic Plate shield. I know the stats shown on the shields looks similar, but I always felt there is a "hidden dimension" beyond the stats that it could normally show. Plus, when I arranged my equipments based on the Natural arrangement (in the Arsenal), Ancient Plate is shown above Volcanic.
So my question of the day: How would you feel if someone argued over two items that seem to have similar stats, like my case? Leave your comments below and correct me if I'm wrong; I'd accept it.
You're asking whether people should argue over equipment? Yes, they should. That's the reason for this forum.
However, at some point the argument runs out of information. After that, people just keep rehashing the same points, getting nowhere. If you got kicked out of a party for arguing, then my guess is that the argument had devolved quite a bit...?
Regarding the actual content of your argument, the normal defense statistic bars are maxed out on both of those shields, so it's conceivable that one has more normal defense than the other. You could settle the argument by running a test of how much normal damage the two shields can sustain. (They appear to have the same health.) Probably this test has already been done.