I mean why shouldn't it? It's not like it HAS anything on the front. I just don't understand why the series dosen't have front accessories (which makes this both a question AND a suggestion). I mean it's not like it would look ugly. It would look perfectly fine with all the front accessories.
The Magic set should have front accessories
Fri, 07/19/2013 - 11:32
Fri, 07/19/2013 - 12:36
#2
^^ And Divine Veil/Chaos have front helm accesories. Why wouldn't they?
Grey Feather has glowing eyes? that's Grey Feather's problem.
But I think he meant the cloaks not the heads...
Fri, 07/19/2013 - 21:41
#3
lol well duh
Yeah I'm pretty sure I mean the cloak.
Sat, 07/20/2013 - 02:35
#4
"pretty sure", there's doubt!?!
The thing is with this is that it would cover up the main feature of the cloaks. You can't add a crest of winter to a Grey Feather Cloak because it would cover up the main-glowing part. :/ (and it would look pretty ugly.) Divine set....possibly, but I don't think front accessories would look good with cloaks in general.
-Potato
Fri, 11/01/2013 - 18:34
#5
I agree
I totally agree. Magic should have front accessorys. It's stupid that EVERY other armor gets it. Why shouldn't magic?
Fri, 11/01/2013 - 21:05
#6
What, no love for the Gunslinger Sashes?
Sat, 11/02/2013 - 12:50
#7
+1
I did testing in Spiral Spy to see if any front Accessories clip with all of the Gunslinger Sashes and Magic Cloaks, and none of them did. No idea why they aren't attachable to the front since there is no issues. Its like Wolver not having attachable front Accessories.
+1
Sat, 11/02/2013 - 13:19
#8
Can you post a Screenshot of a Gunslinger Sash equipped with a Stunning Crest & a Magic Cloak equipped with a Canteen?
Sat, 11/02/2013 - 14:52
#9
Here you go Bitsbee
Magic with Canteen
http://imgur.com/Isqg1Ee,wvYfVbt
Gunslinger with Stunning crest
http://imgur.com/wvYfVbt
The problem is, the Grey Feather Cowl already has Glow-eyes. Abandon thread.