Cause I know I'm not the only bomber sick of hearing ld absurdity all the time.
Which is worse polaris lag, or bn lag?
Tue, 07/23/2013 - 14:32
Tue, 07/23/2013 - 17:41
#2
BN lag, I play LD all the time and have mostly no problems. When I dip into BN, people (and explosions) keep running through the walls.
Wed, 07/24/2013 - 04:29
#3
BN lag easily. In LD if you
BN lag easily. In LD if you lag and die you'll just respawn exactly how you were, but in BN when you lag and go an inch too far and get killed from a bomb or just completely lag and die you may be losing a 15-5-5 upgrade which is definitely a lot worse than simply respawning in a base. But those are really the consequences of the lag. For which is worse I would still say BN, I usually don't lag in LD much unless I'm downloading something (which obviously makes me lag) and in BN when I lag it happens right before the bombs go off then suddenly the whole blasts go across the screen which is annoying since you can't really see where the blasts would be to dodge and well...die.
Wed, 07/24/2013 - 12:57
#4
i have the opposite condition
Granted, BN lag will hit and hit hard, less so for me on EU than US, even though I live in TX...
But the frequency of it is like once per 25 matches.. Elsewise it's occasional blast processing problems and the like.
But god forbid I watch more than one Polaris (supernovas are a bit better for me) in ld... And lawd knows I see Polaris.. Everywhar.
Sun, 07/28/2013 - 07:18
#5
BN
Regardless of what you actually lose, BN lag is far more irritating because if it happens you're dead, period. Bomberman's a game of being in a specific place at a specific time, something that lag prevents, whereas LD's a game of being a generic place to allow AA to connect.
You're lucky if you only get BN lag once per 25 matches. It reliably happens once per match to me and most everyone I know that's played it.
Polaris lag.