Regardless of if you support AT or not, Auto-Target will NEVER be removed. No matter WHAT you do, it will never be removed.
If OOO doesn't listen to well thought-out suggestions, they won't listen to rage-fueled ones.
Petition: Ban all AT petitions!
Mon, 03/24/2014 - 18:10
Mon, 03/24/2014 - 19:15
#2
....
ಠ_ಠ
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 04:15
#3
---
Yes pl0x
+1
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 05:33
#4
Yes.
My name is Phantomhamachi, and I approve of this thread.
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 06:40
#5
-1 to AArdent-Light
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:21
#6
-1 cheAAter
-1 cheAAter
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:27
#7
"If OOO doesn't listen to well thought-out suggestions, they won't listen to rage-fueled ones."
Like this one? Smart move.
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 08:29
#8
Haha Theirllusion :'D
Haha Theirllusion :'D
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 13:08
#9
Brb making petition to ban petitions to ban AT petitions thread.
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 17:14
#10
---
I think it'd be better to make it against the forum rules to beat a dead horse. You know, don't make a thread asking for this to be added or that to be removed for the 1000th time. It clutters the forums.
Ex. no more Dual wielding pl0x or ban AT cheaters pl0x threads.
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 18:13
#11
You think you can ban us from having the opinion that AT is an unfair gameplay element we'd like so see as an option rather than a given.
Wow.
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 18:22
#12
Behold, the evil squares take over the world!
this thread gets a...
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 19:49
#13
Eh?
@Theirillusion So... now is this a rage fueled suggestion or whatever? I didn't curse, insult anyone directly, just put emphasis on my words. I mean sure, it is really demotivating, but being demotivating and angry can be pretty far apart sometimes.
@Feyi I'm not saying you can't complain about it, I'm saying that you shouldn't be able to spam the same EXACT type of thread 1000 times over. (Ironic how this suggestion has been made several times too, but meh.)
Cmon people! GIVE IT UP. Custom lobbies are more than fine. As I said people with terrible connection/skill depend on it in pvp and pve to do well. See, Faber is in Australia and doesn't use AT (Not all the time) BUUUT, not everyone in Australia nearly as skilled as Faber, and if I live in USA, and latency is a problem for me, than what about the people who aren't near Asian, European, or American servers?
Tue, 03/25/2014 - 19:52
#14
People will complain about it until OOO takes a stance on the matter.
As for lobbies: Yes of course lobbies. I don't want AT to to be gone from the game. I want the option to have it gone.
Wed, 03/26/2014 - 03:17
#15
Faber's in my guild and I'm pretty sure he's not from Australia. He is a 1-bar player though.
Wed, 03/26/2014 - 04:47
#16
"I'm not saying you can't complain about it, I'm saying that you shouldn't be able to spam the same EXACT type of thread 1000 times over. (Ironic how this suggestion has been made several times too, but meh.)" -Ardent-Light
You seem to be under the impression that all of these threads are made by one person, or a hivemind of sorts.
"As I said people with terrible connection/skill depend on it in pvp and pve to do well."
I thought we had already settled that AT doesn't help when you have poor connection. It only helps those who already has good connection.
Sat, 03/29/2014 - 13:49
#17
#Petitionception
AT is a helpful tool for certain players, if you gonna remove AT your gonna remove even more LD'ers. With numbers so low in LD already do you really want that? So yeah, +1 to this (sorry I have nothing to do).
Sat, 03/29/2014 - 10:40
#18
@Glittertind
Pics or it didn't happen. I happen to have information that makes it seem very unlikely that AT is client side so what's the counter argument?
Sun, 03/30/2014 - 01:44
#19
@Glittertind You seem to be under the impression that all of these threads are made by one person, or a hivemind of sorts.
I think his point is that it really doesn't matter how many people or hiveminds are making these threads, and that people should know better than to repost the same complaint others have already posted and had ignored. Not that it helps to create anti-petitions, but one can't help but get tired of the same message over and over again eventually.
Also, there's no way AT is client-side. Nothing else about SK is client-side except for rendering. Whether AT helps you through a poor connection or not depends a lot on your timing. Adaptation is key unless your connection is also bouncy, in which case... there's always Solitaire.
Sun, 03/30/2014 - 06:21
#20
Well, as I said, "I thought".
Thoughts influenced by Aus-Lagger's comments on lag and AT, but if you say that's not the case, then sure I guess I thought wrong.
Sun, 03/30/2014 - 08:42
#21
Bingo! If there's anything this community can't settle on, it's how AT works :)
Sun, 03/30/2014 - 14:02
#22
I know something else we can't settle on
What Nick's number 10 was.
Now he's gone and we're still left speculating.
Mon, 03/31/2014 - 01:55
#23
We can settle on that, some people just don't understand that we already did.
Mon, 03/31/2014 - 07:36
#24
This thread is still alive?
Huh.
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 02:20
#25
vg ....
vg ....
i posted this betr in du udder post. u suk
+infinity to this though