Forums › English Language Forums › General › Suggestions

Search

Dual Wield

17 replies [Last post]
Sat, 05/10/2014 - 08:10
Electro-Surge's picture
Electro-Surge

I think that the 5* gunner sets should allow the player to have the ability of dual wield. This could be when the player can equip two guns at once but they would have to give up the shield ( not sure about the shield thing )

So I could equip a setenza and argent peacemaker at the same time and would shoot the gun I hold on my left hand and would shoot the right gun. But with that they wouldn't be able to shield

Then, we could equip 2 alchemers and still have a space for a sword, and we wont have to switch weps to be a good gunner

Please tell me what you think about this idea xD

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 08:31
#1
Sandwich-Potato's picture
Sandwich-Potato

No.

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 08:35
#2
Electro-Surge's picture
Electro-Surge
-_-

-_-

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 08:36
#3
Sandwich-Potato's picture
Sandwich-Potato

Did you bother searching about the several dozen threads made about this?

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 09:00
#4
Thunder-The-Bright's picture
Thunder-The-Bright
gods ain't gonna help you, son.

you don't have to switch weapons to be a good gunner. you need to switch shot to use alchemers effectively. there are guns other than alchemer line.
and after this, it would be unfair, and insanely OP since the gun buff incoming.
and search for other topics to see the general opnion about it. use google and search "site:http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/forum/7 dual wieling"

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 09:05
#5
Sho-Marufuji's picture
Sho-Marufuji
^

^

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 09:08
#6
Lonely-Tear's picture
Lonely-Tear
Im Here With Purpose

sorry but a reson Dual dosnt realy exist is -
it would be too overpowered
remember that this game is spiral KNIGHTS, not bezerkers, not assasins, not mages, not titans... knights
imagine the pvp with dual wield? if strikers werent broken enough already...

sorry to breake it down to you mate but, it just wouldnt realy fit in well.
sorry for bad spelling

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 10:18
#7
Welux's picture
Welux
2 mooch skeerum

As stated, this would INSANELY break the game.
To put an example. Think of a polaris, then think of two people polaris spamming. Got that? then think of a full party polaris spamming, crazy, right?
You still following? Ok.
Now.
Think of 4 dual wielding polaris users destroying the game, and every monster or entity in their wake.
Even worse with pvp. there's 12 people in pvp. (i think) think of a team of 6 doing this, heck, extreme, but think of an entire match of dual wielding polaris using doods running around with the lag force of 4chan DDOS-ing the server.

I hope I've scared this idea out of you, and anyone else who has this idea, or has though of this idea.

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 17:12
#8
Hearthstone's picture
Hearthstone

In addition to dual Polaris... DUAL BLITZ, DUAL SUDARUSKA, DUAL CALLAHAN!

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 18:03
#9
Dibsville's picture
Dibsville

...
...

Cutter lines

...
...

Sat, 05/10/2014 - 22:44
#10
Autofire's picture
Autofire
You are experiencing a PICNIC ERROR!

See this thread, made by the twin who is me.

I made that thread for cases like these.

Sun, 05/11/2014 - 14:46
#11
Thunder-The-Bright's picture
Thunder-The-Bright
gods ain't gonna help you, son.

wait autofire, you had two accounts this whole time or you just happened to get a new one?

Sun, 05/11/2014 - 15:29
#12
Klipik-Forum's picture
Klipik-Forum

Dual Callahan ASI max MSI VH

Mon, 05/12/2014 - 10:11
#13
Fangel's picture
Fangel
No.

This has been brought up many times, and as others have stated, you can simply search google to find out what we have said in the past.

This suggestion is brought up at least once a month by the way. It's why many of us are hostile to the idea.

Now to you all saying PvP would be broken with the dual wield that is suggested, no it would not. Strikers could not boost, recons could not cloak, and guardians could not shield. If you consider that broken, then yes it is. If you think it's a striker buff, no, it is not.

As of now, mastering switch-shooting is essentially dual wielding up to 4 weapons at once. For swords, the cutter line acts as a weak dual-wielded sword.

Mon, 05/12/2014 - 20:27
#14
Gunnerific's picture
Gunnerific
:c

i always hated dual weilding thread not because it's OP but becasue they never thought about dual weilding bombs.
this shows that the community gives no cents to bombers :C

Mon, 05/12/2014 - 20:49
#15
Autofire's picture
Autofire
You are experiencing a PICNIC ERROR!

@Thunder

It was a hic-up when I converted my account to Steam. I can use the old account on the forums and probably the wiki. (But not in the game.)

@Gunnerific (That name is ironic with what you're saying.)

I thought about dual bombing. I don't know how it would work...you drop to bombs at twice the speed? Or do you drop two at once? This would be a bit powerful, depending on the bomb. For direct damage bombs, the damage would double. For haze bombs, it would be useless. For Shard Bombs, it would be a direct nerf because of the hit limit.

Mon, 05/12/2014 - 20:53
#16
Abelisk's picture
Abelisk

Harness such guilty power and frudement shall convain. Yuillguille, a senectation, cardè such tyreiloe hylui. Basically all juilles must gredimarrete under focusing ointe pavachë. So, refracting duality of such prohibitance 'twixt shall I repeat myself not. Solely edjing of quentillescence is to believe threnisaiiuqpesnence. Like undermillium, poingnance is drafoolding, so I must. Unlike our telecontour, it measures my oppornitive to rependify these duality matters. Dual wielding is considered a masking modelleé if you will. In rasdeu, in adieu, and ferlueiu, my grammar is superior. Thus dual wielding can gherebinhit such foolish dictionarical vocabulary I am impending through treachannic remorse. Such noft transcendence we shall hark. But then of listened silence muttered in dual wielding. Not an understand was giving upon reading this rudimentary. Confusing troglodyte you are not. Suggestion this is not. For it has existed much grytherral times. No. Liking longing for typicalities of it, lo, and behold, typex of greudisal presentationatory nauxiouß. Pioolerrè dølçê. Tytherasfictionarenfyiurical poiyturifecnbeaticquirall nonsense! Because my statement is correct, I can impend my plythageroiryllthanegaerin jure.

Tue, 05/13/2014 - 04:54
#17
Xxpapaya's picture
Xxpapaya
The papaya frowns

Two Blitz Needles, two Warmaster Rocket Hammers, two Polaris' (Polari?). It's just too broken >.< It won't work.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system