Unfortunately, I tend to agree.

Back when I was a Swordie striker (with my mule account Kentard) I only dish out 4 to 5k on a toothpick in T2, and that's considered average for the matches I played.
Of course, damage isn't the only factor - my gunner dishes 1 to 2k on T2, but with about 8 captures on average.

Nonetheless, I digress.
While the most logical solution would be to select teams based on average damage, caps, etc., I believe we can continue using that system, with one minor modification:
Completely randomize the teams after every 3 rounds or so regardless of their performance; imbalanced as it may seem it would get rid of the burden of having to play with the 'bad' players for too long; particularly for matches where the disparity between good and bad players are especially large.

last time i played i had a striker murder me and everyone on my team so your idea, kentard, should come to pass

last time i played i had a striker murder me and everyone on my team so your idea, kentard, should come to pass.

Learn to play LD better, or simply don't have your whole team engage someone you know will decimate your team again and again.
Here's another tip: Never have your team congregate at one point for too long, even when capping points. You'll be an easy meal for Strikers - even gun strikers, mind you. I can decimate a team like that with my Umbra Driver (on T3 though).

Alternatively, get someone to play Guardian (preferably two) and make his killing spree much more difficult.

And can you provide another reason why randomizing teams every 3 games regardless of performance would have to 'pass'? Mind you, with that arrangement you have a higher probability of playing on the same team as that 'good striker'.

if the difference between good and bad players is huge, put good players equally on bothe teams and bad players equally on both teams. If theres is more underaverage players then make the team with more underaverage players have better averge or overaverage ppl.

There is a problem with this, though. Some players may fluctuate in performance from one game to another, so the whole idea of 'good' or 'bad' players becomes highly subjective. This applies to all balancing in PvP games, actually.

the main reason why i am mad is because I lose so much money playing Lockdown. I think its fun but if I keep losing and it isn't my fault, then I get pretty maad. If the makier could make the enry fee for lockdown cheaper, that would be appreciated.

Ah, there we go. The 'oh im angry cos i cant win LD cos my team sucks'

I get mad when I join troll party leaders in the Clockworks; I've seen people sabotaging IMF runs on countless occasions. Unfortunately there's no safeguard against stupid people there, so I'll just have to deal with it.
(Also why I play solo in Clockwork levels these days, or call trusted friends.)

As of now, if you are playing LD, understand that you are playing with randoms of questionable skill level, and that the difference between the 'good' and 'bad' players is extremely obvious.
Don't like it? Deal with it and wait it out.