I have a few decisions to make:
I'm in the process of making an armor set for each damage type.
I've made a snarby set (and fallen). I'm currently making vog cub and skolver.
I think I can afford medium UVs. I'm kind of cheap.
Anyway:
Would it be better to match the UV with the defence type, so the vog set would get +elemental UV and the skolver set would get +pierce UVs
or
Switch the UVs, so the vog set would have pierce UV, and skolver set would have elemental UV?
If I have opposite UVs, my armor sets will be more versatile, so if I run into two different damage types in one level, I'll be at least a little protected.
However, beast usually comes with slime, and gremlin usually comes with construct. For this reason, it seems like it would be better to have my armor better against one damage type, and swap armors depending on what I'll be facing.
Which should I do and why?
Also, is there any reason for a swordsman to get any armor sets other than the snarby, vog cub and skolver?
As far as I can tell, pretty much everything else is either for bombers / gunners, or just inferior.
Sword users don't need to stray from Wolver gear for defense, only for status defenses
Damage resist UVs that aren't MAXIMUM!, probably won't mean much on gear