The only reason in which i state that Beast UV's Should do more damage to someone wearing Piercing defense is because if i think of a Wolver and the Wolver Coat line, Wolvers basically are wearing "Wolver Coats" or so i would like to imagine, almost like an Indian Wearing a Wolfs Pelt, A Knight is Wearing a Wolvers "Pelt" Which we know as the Coat.

All this leads me to is that in fact the wolvers coat is susceptible to Pierce even if the games Stats say otherwise, in any case its the less confusing way to put it in terms instead of saying that Construct deals better damage on pierce armor because this would mean Gremlin as well does more damage on Pierce armor, in my setup its best to have two families that can do damage to Pierce rather then Four (Construct, Gremlin, Undead, Slime). Otherwise any weapon could do damage without being too specific.

@Klipik-Forum

I agree whole Heartedly with you on a Set Maximum, the thing to me is though, i almost feel like its another added being it does damage specific to type (Pierce, Shadow, Elemental) unless you mean for this way as well. So it would be like armor almost where max could add 2bars or so of Shadow damage to the weapon in LD. But this would still give way for more extra if say i had both beast and Gremlin (respectively maxed) both 2 Pips one shadow one Pierce. But then again im treading unknown territory to myself in how damage tables and the amount of Pierce, Shadow, Elemental that is given ontop of the weapon along with lets say Damage bonus from a trinket how would that stack being shadow damage is a differ from overall.

Just something i find conflicting. Sorry if its hard to understand at all what ive written im not one that stays up to late.