I'm not leaning heavily one way or the other on this, but recently a thought popped into my head: There are quite a few sets of armor out that have no shield, like Gunslinger. Should they be given shields so they are "complete?"
I'll start a pros-and-cons list that anyone who'd like to contribute to the discussion can add onto:
Pros
- Would make Hall of Heroes missions simpler for those wanting to go for all one set.
- Would remove "issues" with sets like Quicksilver where other shields don't complement the armor as well.
- Would add an amount of variety to the game's current array of shields.
Cons
- Might take a lot of time to implement, giving all the shield-less sets out there.
(Sorry if this is in the wrong section or something. First thread post and all, y'know.)
of all 5* sets, only 10 have a shield. there are 37 5* sets.
let's say it would be better to add a 5* radiant helm and to get a fiend bonus to divine mantle.