Forums › English Language Forums › General › The Arsenal

Search

Opinions on the Omega Shell

37 replies [Last post]
Mon, 04/08/2013 - 08:22
Mataduitan's picture
Mataduitan

soooo im an f2p and with cr/ce being tight and all, i want to get my 5* shield right before i craft something in regret. i've already acquired the 4* CoA (whatever its called) and i have a wise owlite but what really interests me is the omega shell. My question here is that how viable is the omega shell? does it under-perform too much compared to other shield in end-game content? i partly think that the omega shell can be viable with the high shield health and all but i'm just assuming here. Can anyone who have tried the omega shell verify for me?

like i said i don't want to regret having to craft a 5* and find out if it under-performs by a lot. its a pretty hipster shield.

Mon, 04/08/2013 - 08:30
#1
Bopp's picture
Bopp
consider

Consider searching Google for "spiral knights forum Omega Shell". You will see many, many threads. Good luck.

Mon, 04/08/2013 - 23:32
#2
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
I've done some research.

I've done some limited research on the Stone Tortoise (4* before Omega Shell). From what I've seen, its health bonus is enough to compensate for the lack of defense against the other three damage types. It does not compensate for the lack of status defense.

So, that makes the Omega Shell more versatile than Royal Jelly against piercing foes, Dread Skelly against shadow foes, and Grey Owlite against elemental foes, but it is not as strong as, say, a Crest of Almire versus Slag Walkers.

For specifics, the Stone Tortoise will take about 3 hits from a zombie before breaking. Crest of Almire will take 5.
Aegis will break on spikes in...about 3 hits, if I remember right. Stone Tortoise will do the same.

Stone Tortoise cannot take a hit from Vanaduke, unlike the Crest of Almire or Grey Owlite Shield.

Use that information as you see fit.

Tue, 04/09/2013 - 23:44
#3
Coolspiderman's picture
Coolspiderman
Get a swiftstrike buckler and

Get a swiftstrike buckler and focus on armors and weapons

Wed, 04/10/2013 - 01:57
#4
Aureate's picture
Aureate
@Thinslayer

When you say 'Stone Tortoise', did you mean the 4*, or the 5* Omega Shell? (Because if it's the former, you're comparing a 4* shield against a 5*, which isn't quite fair...)

Wed, 04/10/2013 - 09:47
#5
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
@Aureate

The Stone Tortoise is an impressive 4* shield; it can take as many hits from damage sources as some 5* shields can. The Omega Shell is no different. A player would do just fine without ever upgrading to Omega Shell.

Yes, it is unfair - in favor of Stone Tortoise! ;P

Thu, 04/11/2013 - 05:18
#6
Aureate's picture
Aureate

Ah, right. Just wanted to confirm what you were saying. :P

Thu, 04/11/2013 - 08:32
#7
Gravelord-Caste's picture
Gravelord-Caste
/reply Thinslayer

By "no different" do you mean Omega Shell is exactly the same as Stone Tortoise, or it's ST on steroids and nothing else?

Thu, 04/11/2013 - 10:27
#8
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
@Gravelord-Caste

By "no different" I mean that the increased normal defense on Omega Shell does not substantially improve its durability over Stone Tortoise.

Thu, 04/11/2013 - 11:27
#9
Gravelord-Caste's picture
Gravelord-Caste
/reply Thinslayer

From what I can gather from that comment is that either the ST is OP, or the OS is UP. But then again, my "substantially" might be a lot smaller than yours.

Thu, 04/11/2013 - 12:04
#10
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
@Gravelord-Caste

Actually, both are true IMO. The Stone Tortoise is overpowered for a 4* shield, but since the Omega Shell is not a substantial improvement, it kinda becomes weaker than other 5* shields, since the qualities that make the Stone Tortoise great are not improved upon in the 5*.

Fri, 04/12/2013 - 08:53
#11
Fourtarkus's picture
Fourtarkus
xD

Thin, your description of ST v. OS is nearly identical to my opinion of the Vile Striker and the Dread Vile Striker.

Fri, 04/12/2013 - 10:01
#12
Gravelord-Caste's picture
Gravelord-Caste
A solution

We slightly nerf the ST and VS and give steroids to the successors.

Fri, 04/12/2013 - 10:20
#13
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
@Gravelord-Caste

I don't think the Stone Tortoise needs a nerf because it is still outclassed by specialized shields. What makes it overpowered is that its health roughly compensates for lack of special damage defenses, so it completely outclasses the Mighty Defender and Blackened Crest, and outclasses Heavy Plate, Rock Jelly, Scary Skelly, and Wise Owlite against enemies that don't inflict their resisted statuses. We need a buff to the previous two shields, not a nerf to Stone Tortoise.

By the way, my research has shown that Omega Shell holds up remarkably well against fire grates, though not as well as GOS.

Fri, 04/12/2013 - 12:08
#14
Gravelord-Caste's picture
Gravelord-Caste
/reply Thinslayer

Ok, we'll hold off the nerf :P

In all seriousness though, how does the OS hold up compared to the Volcanic Plate Shield? And you didn't say anything about not steroiding the OS. (Yes, that's a word now.)

Fri, 04/12/2013 - 13:28
#15
Snipm's picture
Snipm
@Gravelord-Caste

Won't sustain against Vana's mace that for sure. Status puts a heavy dent in shield health if not resisted.

Fri, 04/12/2013 - 14:14
#16
Flamearc's picture
Flamearc
@snipm

Omega Shell will sustain against the mace.
When the game first came out, everyone used Omega (with Vog Cub) because it was so effective against vana's mace
Then omega shell became useless because they nerfed the mace.
I heard stone tortoise could sustain against it too

Sat, 04/13/2013 - 03:26
#17
Gravelord-Caste's picture
Gravelord-Caste
Wait, what?

Then omega shell became useless because they nerfed the mace.

The OS became useless because they nerfed the mace?!

I hope you missed a word there, because that... looks odd. Or... did they nerf the mace's damage and stick fire on it or something?

Sat, 04/13/2013 - 06:57
#18
Snipm's picture
Snipm
@Gravelord-Caste

Vana's mace has Fire/Stun Normal/Elemental ATM, 3/4 un-resisted is a very bad thing.

Sat, 04/13/2013 - 07:14
#19
Gravelord-Caste's picture
Gravelord-Caste
/reply Snipm

Makes sense, but when Flamearc said they nerfed the mace, do he mean the mace itself had no status and/or Elemental damage? (I.E., it only did Normal) Or did he just make a mistake and meant buffed?

Sat, 04/13/2013 - 08:28
#20
Flamearc's picture
Flamearc
@Gravelord-Caste

Nope. The mace was nerfed in terms of normal damage. Most people used omega for Vanaduke because it could last against it. But then 000 nerfed the mace so other shields like GOS could stand against it making OS very lackluster compared to other shields. For example, why take OS which has no special defense (e.g. elemental) and status when other things can last just as well?

Sat, 04/13/2013 - 09:34
#21
Gravelord-Caste's picture
Gravelord-Caste
/reply Flamearc

For example, why take OS which has no special defense (e.g. elemental) and status when other things can last just as well?

For the Lulz. And because the player is a Mario addict, and wants to pretend they're Bowser with their CTR High Combuster and Fire resistance: MAX! Volcanic Plate set.

On a less serious note, no, I have no idea. Chances are a person'd get it for their collection of shields, perhaps for a challenge run, but little else.

Sat, 04/13/2013 - 10:36
#22
Sandy-Knight's picture
Sandy-Knight
The OS

has the largest Shield health bar of all shields. Ergo, it's a better omni-purpose shield than any other.

Sat, 04/13/2013 - 16:33
#23
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
Because versatility

Do you hear yourselves? If the Omega Shell defends just as well as other shields, that would make it overpowered. Why get three specialized shields when just the Omega Shell will do the job of any of them?

But it doesn't defend "just as well." Status-based attacks will destroy it faster than they will most other shields. That's probably why the OS can't take a mace hit anymore.

Sun, 04/14/2013 - 05:28
#24
Sandy-Knight's picture
Sandy-Knight
The OS will work in all situations

but not as well as any shield geared towards their own particular situation.

It's a utility shield, kinda like Volcanic/Ancient Plate/GOS for statuses.

Mon, 04/15/2013 - 22:07
#25
Fehzor's picture
Fehzor

Say, would anyone happen to know how the omega shell acts when given status UVs? Does it become the greatest thing, or do they not help it much?

Tue, 04/16/2013 - 02:00
#26
Wu-Wei's picture
Wu-Wei
meh

I got my omega shell, and.. meh.. I never use it. It does not look as cool as the 4 star version.
I am a pretty heavy shield user, in some battles it will look like i am fighting in a bubble ;) .. I was surprised how fast the omega shell breaks.

Tue, 04/16/2013 - 07:58
#27
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
@Fehzor

A status UV ought to make it "the greatest thing." Check out my shield damage data, specifically that on Dread Skelly vs. Crest of Almire on fire grates. The difference is substantial, so I can only imagine what the Omega Shell would be like with just half a max bar (=max UV) of status resistance.

@Xutak: Omega Shell shouldn't be breaking very fast under normal usage. According to the data, it should survive better than other shields against sub-optimal damage sources (e.g. GOS vs. elemental+freeze), and it should be competitive with other shields against optimal damage sources (e.g. GOS vs. Firo Knights). It won't be perfect, but it should perform better than usual. I'm going to guess that you're expecting more of it than you should, because it's a pretty durable shield when used properly.

Tue, 04/16/2013 - 23:50
#28
Wu-Wei's picture
Wu-Wei
@Thinslayer

I would choose the Volcanic Plate Shield above the Omega shell any day.
"because it's a pretty durable shield when used properly." *Laughs at 'properly'" :D :D

The damage data is not really comparable if equipment have UV's and UVs of different types and values.

I have a non-UV omega shell. I can update that damage data for you.

Wed, 04/17/2013 - 13:22
#29
Fehzor's picture
Fehzor

Eh, I already have a volcanic plate shield. I'm thinking of getting a shock one. It shall be the greatest thing ;D

Wed, 04/17/2013 - 13:23
#30
Fehzor's picture
Fehzor

[non-purposeful-double-post]

Thu, 04/18/2013 - 00:40
#31
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
@Xutak

Yes, please update that damage data for me; I'd appreciate it. :D

Volcanic Plate will be less useful against pure non-normal damage sources than Omega Shell. How much less is yet to be determined; that'll be my next assignment. I own both Volcanic Plate and Omega Shell. Frankly, Volcanic Plate is downright AMAZING in the Vanaduke boss battle. It stayed intact long after I was certain it would break; once, it took a mace hit, slag charge, and shadow fire in quick succession without breaking. I was very, very, SEERUSLY impressed. Omega Shell could never do that, no matter what UVs you slap on it.

That's kinda my point, though; the shields that are tailored to the level will survive much better than the Omega Shell. The CoA takes zombie attacks better than OS; the GOS takes gun puppy and map hazard attacks better than OS; Volcanic Plate takes spike wheels and mace hits much better than the OS. Heck, even (or should I say especially?) Dread Skelly takes zombie attacks better than OS.

But the OS will take zombie attacks about as well as GOS, fire grates about as well as CoA, and spike wheels about as well as either of those two. And that's really my point about the shield - against sub-optimal damage sources, the OS performs as well or better than other shields.

Thu, 04/18/2013 - 01:22
#32
Wu-Wei's picture
Wu-Wei
mhm

True .. true

Thu, 04/18/2013 - 18:27
#33
Batabii's picture
Batabii

I really don't think UV, which are RANDOM, should have ANY bearing on whether a shield/weapon/armor is bad or good.

Many weapons have a specific damage bonus by default. But just because you can get the same bonus from a random UV doesn't necessarily make them useless.

I'm still debating whether to upgrade my stone tortoise, and this thread is very unsure about whether it's worthwhile or not.

Thu, 04/18/2013 - 23:59
#34
Thinslayer's picture
Thinslayer
@Batabii

I do not recommend upgrading your Stone Tortoise. The health that makes this shield great is not improved upon (I don't think) in the Omega Shell, and the normal damage difference does not appear to be substantial. It might take pure normal attacks better, but those tend to be heavy-hitting, and Plate is generally better against those.

It's the health, not the normal resistance, that makes it great, and the health is not improved in the 5*. So don't bother.

Fri, 04/19/2013 - 04:31
#35
Fehzor's picture
Fehzor

@Larry

I really think that UV, which are RANDOM have SOME bearing on whether a shield/weapon/armor is bad or good.

Many weapons have a specific damage bonus by default. Because you can get the same bonus from a random UV makes them useful.

There is no reason not to upgrade to 5* other than that it isn't going to be that good, provided that you aren't pressed to upgrade something else at all first. If you've already got enough stuff though, you might as well.

Fri, 04/19/2013 - 08:53
#36
Zeddy's picture
Zeddy
@Larry

You can get an elemental UV or a fire UV on anything. You cannot, however, get a health UV. For this reason, having extra health built into the shield is of unique value.

Sat, 04/20/2013 - 16:18
#37
Skold-The-Drac's picture
Skold-The-Drac
OS

Cheap man's Swiss army shield. Takes three hits of most anything save some boolit. Mace'll drop it in a hit w/o uvs.

Granted, specialist shields would be more awesome, with an OS and some status uvs, you pretty much sit golden for anything.

I'd go after an OS if I wanted a single shield that'd do the job for MOST runs.
Plate line for insane pinball kb whenever you just don't care though.
Given a shock, fire, and poison/freeze UV, I'd only use an OS for all my runs. Just because it'd tank too well for me not to.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system