Some plots of binomial distribution using the best estimate of the parameter (book drop chance) and varying BK encounters may be more helpful. We need to understand that we are part of the distribution, so weird things do happen (getting book drop on first BK encounter, not getting a book after few hundred BK encounter.)
Example: Using book drop chance = 1% and no. of black kat encounter (n=298)
http://keisan.casio.com/keisan/lib/virtual/tmp/5483484773.png
x Binomial distribution
0 0.05003662287
1 0.1506153
2 0.22592293
3 0.2251623
4 0.1677345
5 0.0996241
6 0.0491412
7 0.02070596
8 0.007607871
9 0.002476187
10 7.228465E-4
11 1.9116602E-4
12 4.6182363E-5
1st column: no. of book obtained after killing 298 BKs
2nd column: the corresponding probability.
Why pick n=298? Because P(298,n>=1) ~= 0.95. We are 95% you will get at least one book after killing 298 black kats.
Take away message: Statistics are incredibly useful to understand any large scale phenomena, but you are only one of the data point making up the distribution. stop complaining when things dont work in your favor, because by principle there has to be those really unlucky and lucky ones such that the distribution holds.
A detailed, objective study is just what we've needed. Your methodology seems solid. You report your number of data and the resulting confidence interval. Your study provides dependable information that will really help players.
One question: How many books did you find in this study? I don't see where you've said.