Forums › English Language Forums › General › Graveyard

Search

Here's an idea on AA

53 replies [Last post]
Sat, 11/24/2012 - 22:17
#51
Severage's picture
Severage
@Brady:

See, I don't follow your logic here. You don't use HP trinks or UVs, yet you do use AA.

Do you see AA as the least of the helpful things to use it? Or otherwise, why not use HP trinks or UVs? If you use AA to be equalized with HP trink users or UVers, and think it's stupid to turn it off just for ego purposes, why not use HP trinks and/or UVs?

I don't see AAing with a hammer as productive, maybe competitive in the sense that you're hard as [bucket] to kill.

For my part, I don't use any of them because I'm F2P and can't waste money on things specifically for LD. As for AA, I find it more challenging to play without it. Simply put, I'd rather not people accuse me of using AA when I don't have the Heart trinks or UVs that they have.

So, that should send a clear message that I wouldn't mark myself for using AA even if I did.

~Sev

Sat, 11/24/2012 - 22:36
#52
Forum-Brady's picture
Forum-Brady
Because AA is free and

Because AA is free and available to me, whereas crafting UVd swords, Skolver Set and Heart trinkies would be for the express purpose of sword-striker PvPing, which I don't do that much. I wouldn't use any of that in my CW runs at all; I don't want to craft all that just for a side-interest in LD.

maybe competitive in the sense that you're hard as [bucket] to kill.

When anyone can kill you in two hits, ^ is all that matters. It takes me 5 hits to kill them anyways, so I'm in no rush to end the fight; I'm only interested in surviving past the first two seconds.

Sun, 11/25/2012 - 11:59
#53
Spookington's picture
Spookington
Hmmmm.... Yeah, this should be graveyard'd

While I understood why no one would want to mark themselves using AA, I did not see the inherent problem in allowing people not using AA to display that they are doing so. Through a flood of replies addressing that aspect, I see why it's quite a bad idea. Since I no longer have a leg/argument on which to stand on here, the only thing stupider for me to do at this point would be to continue this thread. Consider it gone. Or close to gone. Whatever. Graveyard'd.

I saw a sudden onset of attacks against my personal opinions and thought to retaliate with even greater force. I see that it was unwarranted. Specific apologies to Marlwoof - I couldn't find anything to get angry at in that post and it would be unreasonable to keep this up.

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system