Multiple tiers of jukeboxes; higher tier jukeboxes are more expensive but play more tunes. Or some mechanism to upgrade jukeboxes as your guild grows and gets more capable.
50cr to queue a track; 200cr to clear the queue and immediately play your track; 100cr to queue up five random tracks. Just spare change, but that's the spirit of a jukebox; anyone who can reach the jukebox (including public) can throw some coins in to queue a tune. The crowns can either vanish or go into guild treasury.

How about navigating yourself to the sound folder. but I find the sound quality there is pretty much bad, probably to prevent copyright infringement? Meh.

my fav is the wolver song. with them drums.
would love to hear that in my GH.
+1

Please stop making new threads over this :/

You do know Hexzyle people can have orginal ideas even though they already exist.

It could be like smash bros. brawl where a monster might randomly drop a CD with music that reflects the level it's on. It would be very rare though. Also the slot machine at the end of a depth could give out tracks that don't at all relate to any other level. Of course they'd be really rare and very pricey to sell in the AH. I give a +1.

There could be preview button to listen to the music like you would when you want to preview armor and weps!

Hex. search bar sucks butt.

Music, and the guild can go buy music

Haha, too bad some people don't know.

Here is a complete "Google Search for Dummies" guide on how to use google

and the fact that this suggestion can be found easily through google search, meant that this thread is unoriginal, and we should therefore teach you how to use google search.

You're missing the point King. Point being, that instead of making more threads asking for the same thing, they should find the most relevant existing thread and comment on that instead.

Because frankly, it gets plain annoying after the twentieth time.

Don't believe me, look at Pets, Dual Wielding, Houses and the like.

"The fact is no one cares if its original or not!"

Incorrect.

Back to the subject at hand, there are a few problems I spot with this:
When you buy a new track to play, who decides which are played, when, how, and what measures will there be to prevent someone constantly overriding the Music choice?

I propose that the Music be editable only in Design mode, with a Preview option so you can see what the Track sounds like. Upon publishing the Hall with the selected Track, said track will then be played upon Entry to the Hall until changed.

...

Normally here's where I'd launch into a heated counter-rant, but I really can't be bothered this time. Too tired, too melancholy, and just plain sick of this.

Your little quip at Hex and Zaffy does nothing to deter the point that you are posting an idea that has been suggested before. As such, protocol dictates to find the most recent and relevant thread and support it. If none are satisfactorily detailed enough, you suggest in your on thread, noting that you have in fact looked at the other threads.

"Ignorance = Foolishness my friend."
"Now that all the trash has been taken out,"

I find it funny how you decide to label me as trash after witnessing just one of my posts, which neither attacked you nor insulted your idea. Pointing out an error =/= insulting, however stoic.

"you would have seen that I posted a comment with precisely what you just said"

I re-read the whole thread and found no such 'precise repeat' of what I had suggested. If anything, it was scattered in little bits across the thread; unorganized, and incomplete.

Not to mention that Hypocrisy screams a chorus at your statement about Ignorance; you were ignorant of the fact that previous threads with the same idea existed, you were ignorant of the fact that you were supposed to find such previous threads, even if only to cite them as being referred to, you are also ignorant of the fact that creating threads with the same idea as previously created thread also clutters the forum with 'duplicates' and annoys some of the other posters because more often than not, nobody bothers to look, and fifty threads come up all mentioning the same thing, as I related to earlier about Pets and Dual wielding etc.

Which relates to the use of Google because the SK Forum Search bar is shot to Firestorm, and a simple thirty second search is all that is required to show that you put in the effort to see if the idea had been mentioned before, which in itself at least shows considerative thought.

TL;DR: If you're not going to consider outside criticism, be it on your idea or on your conduct considering your relative 'newness' to an unknown area, I fail to see why you would ask for such outside opinions.

Side note, the Original thread Hex linked belongs to Severage; the guy who's thread compiled all of the other Guild Hall suggestions and who's pretty much the SK authority on GHs. His Original thread was at least party responsible for the recent GH update, and as such, had decided to continue his work compiling and refining GH suggestions in another 'Mega Thread'.

The mentioned being more organized and comfortable to discuss ideas in, considering that people interested in improving Guild Halls focus on his thread for critiques and suggestions, because he knows what he's doing.

I can't express how funny it is that you guys are almost incapeable of dropping an issue! I mean, bowlda steps in and stops an argument and you two just ignore it go back to your rant about search engines! Also, I was wondering psycho, how come you always say your not going to launch into an angry rant and then you rant anyway? Please, all your getting upset over is the fact that the original post didn't mention if the idea had been posted before. Really, just get over it already!!

If you dont like the same idea getting repeated, why don't you just not read it? Seriously, aren't you capeable of doing that? XD

"I understand what you are saying but am respectfully asking you to stop pretending to be an expert on forum law encorcement."

I don't pretend to do anything. If anything, I say what I know, and say it how I know it. I dislike being referred to as an 'expert' in any field whatsoever, considering I don't think I'm capable of such levels of intelligence, despite what people may say about me

As for going outside: I don't like discussing my lack of a social life, but I don't deny it. Yeah, I don't have many friends. As such, I have pretty much nothing else to do. What I do with my excess time however, is not your concern. Just because I frequent on a forum instead of socializing is no reason to judge my posts any different.

Being more specific, I have considered it, and I don't care for it, on the account of 'nowhere to go and nothing to do'.

"it is neither your responsibility nor your right so I would appreciate it if you would stop your useless typing."

You were informed of protocol just now. Just because no-one's stopping you from doing something wrong doesn't mean you should go ahead and do it anyway. Your inability to take a correction just shows arrogance on your part.

The Admins only moderate the Suggestions forum when there are cases of personal attack or the like. They treat the Suggestions section more like an idea pool. They likely can't be bothered to read every single thread and pick at whatever's wrong, because that'd take too long and would be even more boring than the tedious fixes they have to do elsewhere as other parts of their jobs.

Relating to my earlier point that repeat threads just clutter the place and would be less likely to be read, considering the 'Ugh, this again' thought that comes by after reading a number of threads saying exactly the same thing.

'Useless typing'? Now you're really just being arrogant. I'm refraining from being an angry-poster right now, because I'm in no mood for it. So I'll just skip that part of my 'rant'.

As for the idea: "Whether that is through design mode is irrelevant and unnecessary."

Not true. Even if only a GM or Officer could change t, it stands that someone(s) could just spam different music selections and there'd be disorder. Also, I'm not entirely sure if changes to the Game's layout of an area can be changed so easily, hence the 'reboot' publishing the GH gives to reset the Music scheme.

In which case only Officers and GMs can confirm the selection anyway. Vets can make changes, but they are unable to publish.

@Kingprat:
"Also, I was wondering psycho, how come you always say your not going to launch into an angry rant and then you rant anyway?"

1) "Always"? I said it once. Singular.
2) Operative word is 'Angry'. In case you haven't noticed, the anger element of my posts is absent for the moment. Rant I still will, but the emotional aspect of the rant plays a fairly important part as well.

As for the bulk of your messages telling us to 'get over it already', you yourself seem incapable of accepting the fact that the standard method of 'Search before posting' had been breached. We're not asking for him or anyone to suddenly break down and apologize, before graveyarding the thread. The least a situation like this calls for is an acknowledgement of the breach and an understanding of what went wrong where; neither of you seem capable of managing that either.

"If you dont like the same idea getting repeated, why don't you just not read it?"

Despite the saying, Ignorance=/=Bliss. I could explain that point into oblivion, but there'd be no point to that either.

TL;DR:
Just because your superior isn't telling you off for doing something wrong doesn't mean it's right. At the very least, acknowledge what you're doing wrong and either work around it or discard it entirely. If you can't manage that, you have no right to tell people to stop telling you that you're wrong; you don't even acknowledge the mistake yourself.

As another side note, I'm prone to rants. Whether or not I make it an angry one is a different matter entirely.

As a repeated point, you're much more likely to be productive discussing things over with Severage. He actually knows what he's talking about. And I'm not saying that just because of his old Mega thread; I've known him longer than that, and he really does know what he talks about. Probably due to him thinking over GH suggestions longer than anyone else, when he was more active.

EDIT:
"your grammar is rather poor."

Don't even get started on my English. You want to insult me, insult my points. My Grammar is hardly 'atrocious', so calling it such is a gross exaggeration at best.

I could go into another rant entirely defending my use of terms and syntax, but the way I type is the way I speak (Speak being a relative term, considering I don't have many people to talk to. I'm better expressed in text anyway). Just because I don't follow your book doesn't make it wrong.

"Sorry about that; your grammar has been bugging me for a while..."

...Seriously? Insult me with hardly-valid points and then apologize? Yea-no.

"Sorry but it's true."

I could go on about what else is 'true' regarding this debate but I think I'll stop here.