.SSR dlo eht kcab gnirB
Snosaer:
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/58425
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/74337
.olleH
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 13:04
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 13:29
#2
Yes to bringing back the old RSS.
No to typing backwards, my head hurts.
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 13:37
#3
52485 edon
H
i
.
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 16:11
#4
Lick Number 58425
¿sıɥʇ ʇnoqɐ ʍoH
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 16:36
#5
How do that :P
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 16:38
#6
whoah..how did you do that
whoah..how did you do that
Sun, 02/10/2013 - 21:43
#7
Lick Number 58425
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 05:01
#8
-1
There was a good reason it was changed.
@Michaelb
"http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/74337"
Why did you use a joke thread as a nosaeR?
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 00:07
#9
Lick Number 58425
There was a reason, but it sure wasn't good.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 02:29
#10
@Hexzyle
We would like to hear that good reason. I sure have yet to.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 05:03
#11
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 05:22
#12
Oh man... I miss Brady a lot. I wonder when is he coming back.
@Hexy :
Umm... So what if it is OP ? Isn't Blitz Needle OP too ? Isn't Brandish OP too ? Isn't.. better not to say. But sorry, saying that removing a weapon just because it was OP is not a valid reason in my book. If they remove it, at least remove all OP weapons in the game. Why should the Bombers be the victims everytime ?
I am not a bomber, but crafted Bomber Set just for RSS. I quit bombing since that update.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 07:03
#13
I tried opening the links backwards...
But my browser could not comprehend that and imploded just like my economy did 10 minutes ago when I bought a Mewkat Pocket Monster.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 07:05
#14
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 08:58
#15
node 58425
@Oats's 3rd comment: Your thread links to almost everything already and Zeddy's was the only one that I could think of otherwise.
@Hexzyle: It's not a joke thread! It a complaint! My last complaint thread, "I've changed my position," is nowhere to be found! So I didn't link it. What a letdown, eh?
@Dragneel: I'm sorry to say this, but after seeing those two posts, I am not sure that I miss him a lot.
@Zeddy: I'm sure that every RSS thread gets booted at one point or another.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 09:05
#16
@Zeddy
Shards weren't
@Zeddy
Shards weren't removed. They were fixed. They still operate the way they used to, but the pieces from the bomb explode like they should and dont fly out in all directions in some silly and pointless manner. There are some possible alterations that could be done to shards, but I don't see the old ones coming back exactly how they were anytime soon.
Brandishes are dumb and need a nerf. Alchemers are semi-balanced. They're not obnoxiously over the top like so many weapons and armors currently are. Rather than bringing in more OP weapons to [redacted] all over current weapon balance (current weapon balance? Haha that's funny), how about we start fixing what we currently have?
The Deconstructor is looking pretty miserable in the corner there... how about a hug?
@Michaelb
It's not a joke thread! It a complaint! My last complaint thread, "I've changed my position," is nowhere to be found! So I didn't link it. What a letdown, eh?
When there are so many complaint threads been posted, it pretty much makes the thread into a joke, and not in the funny way. What's the point of making another thread? Because you have to have your name at the top and then your delusional ego inflates when the developers make it happen? That's right, collaborating is stupid, who needs a megathread that will be noticed for its intelligent discussion when everyone can to lead their own seperate half-baked campaigns in the form of hundreds of threads trashed across the forum.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 09:23
#17
58425
@ Hexzyle: The shards weren't "fixed". Now they are glitchy, cause a glitchy status problem, and are easy to avoid. I can only think of one reason why anyone would think they were "fixed," and that's that they had trouble defeating people who used them (In LD). The new shards are pathetically easy to dodge and don't even appear 20% of the time.
My "delusional ego" is not going to "inflate" if and when a miracle occurs and the devs actually listen to us. My delusional ego might be happy about it, but if the devs do bring back the old bombs in some way, I will also be aware of the fact that it is not because of the things that I have said but rather those said by other people -- such as Oatmonster, Zeddy, Tilybb, Serell, Fehzor, The-Rawrcake and Dancinjen.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 09:07
#18
@Michaelb
I'm sorry, since when did the developers make this entire game revolve around lockdown? When has equipment in lockdown ever been balanced? And what's this glitchy status problem you speak about?
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 10:17
#19
@Hex
Read the edit.
The status that I was referring to is stun (this applies only to the new Sun Shards line). While it is true that the new shard bombs are certainly usable(an idea that was originally built on by Tsubasa-No-Me(?)), they are almost always incomparable to the old ones(Also in PvE).
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 10:44
#20
@Michaelb
"My "delusional ego" is not going to "inflate" if and when a miracle occurs and the devs actually listen to us. My delusional ego might be happy about it, but if the devs do bring back the old bombs in some way, I will also be aware of the fact that it is not because of the things that I have said but rather those said by other people
Sorry that I worded it offensively. I was trying to imply that there was absolutely no need for the derpbillionth thread to be created on this subject, just so your name could be sitting at the very top. Especially when said post contains a mere 5 words.
"The status that I was referring to is stun"
(Cough) I use Sudaruska, Fearless Rigadoon and Stagger Storm all the time. I've never had any problems with stunned monsters.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 10:49
#21
node 58425
@ Hex: Well, yes. I concede that A new thread was partly unnecessary, but we like to have one RSS thread up at all times -- at least I do.
Correction: 6 words.
I didn't notice that update.
Mon, 02/11/2013 - 10:56
#22
@Michaelb
You could bump one of those huge ones with the crapload of discussion in them. Minimizes the amount of searching people have to do when quoting other people's extensive replies on things (Like i had to do with Dark-Brady's posts)
.saedi diputs gnikam potS