I have been think about this but I can't seem to see which is better.Since CIV have high undead it will be useful for FSC.Levi seems to be good for everything else.I am starting to think CIV is better but every time I change my mind.I want players to recommend what's better for me.
CIV or Levi
doesnt Levi Blade do more damage to undead than CIV thats what i hear
in any case levi blade is good for everything
I mean, really, how often are you going to do FSC? But if you want the best sword, get a combuster. Hits 0-5% less than Levi, but continues to hit multiple enemies multiple times with fire damage.
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/10480
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/15053
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/11856
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/7470
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/12174
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/14249
http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/6472
Levi, all of these say levi.
I meant what will do me better when I reach FSC in tier three
FIREstrom citadel. Not ICEstorm citadel.
Why burn them? You can't when I last checked. Freeze or shock em if your gonna go brandish. And he said Levi vs CIV. Not combuster vs Levi vs CIV.
ICEstorm citadel.
doitdoitdoitdoitdoitdoitdoitdoit. I love ice-themed levels. Fighting in the middle of a blizzard... Awww yeah.
Yeah that would be epic. Skolver would actually gave a point then. (Mainly used in jelly)
Perhaps make the boss of the ISC the "Frost" equivalent of Vog. And the entire level is filled with Frostifurs and Alpha Frostifurs.
shutupandtakemymoney.jpg
But I digress... Back to the topic; Leviathan.
This game is weird, you can use any element against any element weak enemy.
Yep, can Combuster on zombies made out of fire... makes sense to me. Glacius or the volt brandish line say hi though.
Are they gonna fix this someday and make elements have its own "triangle"?
***
Anyway, Levi because CIV does marginally more damage to undead vs using an element sword, and less damage to everything else.
Yep, can Combuster on zombies made out of fire... makes sense to me.
No. They can't be set aflame.
Are they gonna fix this someday and make elements have its own "triangle"?
There exists something of a circle for status; fire status can't be put upon fire enemies, curse -> undead, freeze -> frozen enemies, etc.
if you have 2 weapon slots you want a levi, because you can't specialize and the levi is better at a neutral role
if you have 4 weapons slots, get an elemental weapon instead of either. if you get one, make it the levi because it's better for vana...which is the only purpose either serves if you have enough weapon slots to specialize. also levi is better against 5/6 monster types than the civ, and undead are really easy.
there is one thing going for the civ: it looks cooler. so if you can deal with a sword that is only a little weaker but looks a lot cooler, get the civ. there's no other reason to get it.
~Spag
Well I say CIV because it looks a lot cooler and that's what matters to me. Call me shallow; I don't really care. So what if it takes me a couple minutes longer to kill Vanaduke--you win or lose FSC on strategy and damage avoidance, not weapon stats. To be fair though, I play mostly AP and shivermist, so the sword isn't really my primary...
I will admit I'm quietly hoping that they fix the CIV/LEVI balance so that the CIV is better, though.
I, however, went with CiV. Mostly for looks, but also I like fighting Undead (especially paired with my Shivermist)
Ahem. I choose CIV because it looks way cooler, and IDC about some damage loss...
but overall, Levi is a better sword.
I'm probally going to use a Levi.And going to use a blizzard brand for FSC.
Go levi.
Quicker to get, but mainly dukes mask phase. Resist to all but normal. You will want the extra damage there. Still, better in more ways an every way.