The only "content" you offer is to imitate a weapon which already exists and will be inferior to before the change even happens. It was also the same thing someone else posted in a thread I would link if it mattered.

If you want real ideas on Spur see this or scroll down a little on this.

"I'm getting tired of Brandish/Calibur, Sealed Sword or Flourish"
"Crimson Hammer looks too much like a Flourish to be considered like a new attack pattern"

No meme image or video link can express the disappointment which would boil my blood right now if I did not know you are a clone. Clones live in a special place.

"I am not a lazy dumbass. I'm just lazy"

...Ok, you really CANNOT expect people to be nice to you if you have that attitude.

Not to mention you just proved my point for me.

"I am clearly not doing something wrong."

...I don't even need to point out how stupid that sounds.

But I'm going to anyway.

-"I'm new on the forum and don't search for zombie thread... :S"
-"I'm getting tired of Brandish/Calibur, Sealed Sword or Flourish as swords"
-"I want a cool 5* weapon that could bring fun to player"
-"I"

-Didn't bother looking for existing threads.
-Refused to even try to look for existing threads.
-Suggested an idea based on a personal whim.
-Didn't put any effort into the idea itself.
-Got pissy at people for pointing out his obvious shortfalls.

Get out. Seriously. You can't even be bothered putting in effort and expect everyone to tolerate your ignorance.

Such naughty language, Mr. Shamanala, that won't do. Basically, what Psycho is trying to say, is that you are providing no other reason to why winmillion should get a 5* other than " I want it, so it should be made." And he is right. And you gave little to no detail for this idea. And you using such language is not helping your case at all, so it would be in your best interest to watch that mouth of yours if you want people to actually take this (not very well thought out) idea seriously.

~Magnicth

The Developers aren't going to put something in-game based off of a suggestion that is vague and provides little to no detail. If you really want a 5* sword, explain why and what it does, not just say "I want one".

The Community here has seen about 500 threads just as vague and ambiguous as yours on this subject. I'm sure OOO is aware people "want one", though who knows why is a mystery. It also has seen one or two really good threads on the 5* winmillion. Why not look for one of those?

In short, you're not adding any productive conversation, least of all by swearing at other people, by posting this thread. Granted, Psycho isn't the most positive one when it comes to these threads. Still, his point remains.

Many people here want a 5* winmillion, but your thread basically just says "I want one, OOO make it, idc what it's like". Who would support that?

It's a suggestion section and if you had read the rules of forum. I ain't doing nothing wrong.

There are good, well thought-out suggestions, and otherwise. The rules don't force you to make a good suggestion, but that doesn't mean you should make very vague ones just because you can. Also, if you had read the rules of this forum, you'd know swearing is wrong too.

~Sev

"maybe keep the Winmillion but add some elemental variant? like a poison 4* winmillion? It seems most people would be afraid that Winmillion would become obsolete when a 5* appear but if it stays at the "last stage" with some other variant, wouldn't it solve most problems?"

"maybe keep the Winmillion but add some elemental variant"

Okay. Take the Winmillion as it is right now and switch its normal for element damage. Still awful. Still useless. Now what?

"a poison 4* winmillion"

Okay. Put a poison rate on it. Still awful. Still useless. Now what?

"most people would be afraid that Winmillion would become obsolete when a 5* appear"

Okay. What does the 5* have? What would make its 4* obsolete, though with almost all equipment the 5* is superior to the 4* because it is the direct upgrade of it?

You and many before you have convinced yourselves that having only a very simply and basic idea is more than enough to be a suggestion. Sure. Want to know how this started several paragraphs worth of stuff? This quote from myself in the post before it:

"Every time you attack something, no matter what kind of attack you use, it has a chance to give you a damage bonus in a state called 'Power'. Power stacks up to one hundred levels of the effect, each level giving +1% damage (it sounds overpowered if you try to apply it to Spiral Knights but it works over there), but you have to gain the effect at least one level every turn or it completely falls off. When it gets to one hundred it will not continue to grow, so stacking up more of it only keeps it on. "

How big is that paragraph? Tiny. How many ideas did it create? A lot. Why should anyone care? More details from us means less frustration for them to create it. They know what they would be creating because we gave them the details. It may have started small, just something that gains damage when you hit stuff, but it became something creative. Would you rather the players discuss what they want then the developers know exactly what to work on, or the players say "I want a thing that does stuff" then wait for the developers to take a decade to figure out what we mean?

I already linked two threads about Spur which I contributed to. Why should I, or anyone else, care about this thread when those two have significantly more and better content? Why should we come up with ideas when you were the one who made this thread when we could make our own threads?

People expect you to put in 10 minute's worth of effort at least. For a weapon that would be something along the lines of:

• Reason we could do with this weapon (e.g. Combuster - pure damage-dealing elemental Brandish)
• Damage inflicted and status proc'd (split normal/elemental, fire)
• Swing speed and rhythm (three moderate-speed swings, stagger on last hit only, as Calibur)
• Charge attack (one swing and line of explosions, chance to proc fire)
• Appearance (large sword with glowing red centre)
• Predecessors and upgrades (Brandish - Fireburst Brandish - Blazebrand - Combuster)
• Anything else you think would be of use regarding the weapon

Your first post has none of this. You ask for a weapon that shoots missiles; we have the DA that shoots three projectiles on its charge already. You don't give us any particular reason for this other than wanting new weapon attack patterns, when you're just reusing an old one. You then say you're tired of common swords but then continue by telling us that you dislike a lesser-used one as well and don't bother with it. And when you do come up with an amendment to your idea, you put it in the middle of the thread where it isn't obvious to anyone reading it. You also insult several people on the forums, although I admit some of us could have been more polite about their responses.

A Hammer works nothing like a Flourish; the former is a 3-beat slow elemental sword with swing-dash-swing that can hit up to 3 times on its dash, and has a great deal of movement. The latter is a 3-beat fast piercing sword with swing-stab-stab with considerably less lunge. Hammer drags allies forward with its two-stroke charge; Flourish doesn't have this effect on its three-stroke charge, which is exactly like its standard attack pattern but with more damage - not to mention that the Hammer is a massive hammer where the Flourish is a sparkle pixie sword.
How, precisely, are these swords similar?

Writing the above took 10 minutes' worth of my life, by the way. With another 5 minutes I could probably derail this thread with a decent version of your suggestion.

I just want to say that I never once bashed you. I tried to explain why your OP (Original Post) wasn't a good suggestion. I confess after scanning through and only reading a fight between you and Psycho, that I didn't read in detail everything you said afterward.

"Now my only experience on this forums are: 1. They don't know 2. and if you don't spent 100 hours on it, we don't care and won't discuss with you to develop your idea and maybe (just maybe) help each other out 3. All LD pros (with decked out UV ofc...)"

1. *Wooosh*
2. Not when there are other threads that have art and concepts that you could reference pretty simply. Even if you made an new thread that wasn't dead, referencing what they had, and building on it.
3. What? I don't even have any LD-related UVs on my LD set. I don't even know where you made this correlation....

This is the Suggestions forum, not the Opinions forum. A great way to start is by creating innovative ideas.

~Sev