Forums › English Language Forums › General › Suggestions

Search

Rifles

19 replies [Last post]
Mon, 12/10/2012 - 22:16
Lightplasma's picture
Lightplasma

I think it would be cool if OOO added rifles to the game, because if we have pistols, why can't we have rifles?
If they added rifles, I'm assuming they would be better than pistols of the same star statwise, which would probably make players complain that rifles were overpowered. So if OOO made it so rifles also took up your sheild slot along w/ a weapons slot, that would be a huge tradeoff.
Rifles would potentialy fire faster and further than a pistol, and probably deal a bit more damage, or maybe shoot slower and further, and deal mor dmg with some knockback. Maybe they would have to reload every shot or something.

I'm pretty sure theres been a thread about this sometime, but seeing as my search bar doesn't work, I don't know.

Mon, 12/10/2012 - 22:24
#1
Mzculet's picture
Mzculet
Eh?

Maybe you could show us what types of guns in this games are Pistols?

"Rifles would potentially fire faster"

By the way here is your Rifle

Mon, 12/10/2012 - 22:34
#2
Lightplasma's picture
Lightplasma
Pistols

I don't see how a blitz needle is similiar to my rifle (I've never used on myself though)
And pistols are pretty much anyting under the handgun category in the game currently.
I actually thought of a more semi- auto gun. Automatic firing with more damage and range isn't exactly fair...
And the blitz needle sprays the shots. I wanted a gun that could deal more dmg, have a longer range, and shoot semi- auto more accurately.

Mon, 12/10/2012 - 22:49
#3
Luguiru's picture
Luguiru

Oh boy.
Oh man.
Oh elderly.
What are you doing to old people?
Nothing, Vernon.

"I think it would be cool"

You know what I think would be cool? This. And that. No one said it had to be 'cool' to anyone else.

"added rifles to the game, because if we have pistols, why can't we have rifles?"

They are called handguns. Guns that you hold in your hands. You know, like real guns, but without people obsessing over them to compensate masculinity. Girlfriend not satisfied? Show her some big guns, that ought to cheer her up.

"I'm assuming they would be better than pistols of the same star statwise, which would probably make players complain that rifles were overpowered"

Handguns cover a wide variety of firearms from Autoguns with rapid boolits to Alchemers with bouncing boolits to Pulsars with bomb boolits to Sealeds with sword booli- wait a derp, Sealed is a sword not a gun. Oh, never mind. Nick says swords that act like guns are okay. Never mind then.

"made it so rifles also took up your sheild slot along w/ a weapons slot, that would be a huge tradeoff."

Oh look, the exact same thing everyone else who made a thread about this exact same topic said. How creative and original. I could make out with that raw imagination then make love to it all night. You are now imagining your imagination sleeping with a wooden crate. The crate has more than one kind of wood.

Are you happy? You made me make innuendos about a wooden crate. What kind of twisted crazy person does that? This guy.

"Rifles would potentially fire faster and further than a handgun"

You mean an Autogun.

"and probably deal a bit more damage"

Autogun.

"maybe shoot slower and further"

Autog- Actually, Autoguns have slightly shorter range than most other handguns and take a couple seconds to fire while restricting mobility.

"deal more damage with some knockback"

Like the Volcanic Pepperbox, which is an Autogun alchemy branch.

"reload every shot or something"

The basic attack for Autoguns have a two shot clip, but all gun charge attacks make the user reload at the end.

"I'm pretty sure theres been a thread about this sometime"
"but seeing as my search bar doesn't work, I don't know."

You know that feeling when some random guy you never met before tells a really bad racist joke and one or both of your parents happen to be that race? That is how I feel about this thread. You may not believe it but this is the exact same Autogun imitating as at least eight other threads on the exact same topic with equal if not less intelligence put into them. Why do people ask for something which we practically already have? Too much Call of Duty? Is Spiral Knights suddenly a FPS because we have guns? Okay. Every game that involves some kind of ranged weapon or firearm has to be a FPS so people can get their daily injection of FPS to trip out on. Maybe take it in a pill form in the back door.

"I don't see how a blitz needle is similiar to my rifle"
"(I've never used on myself though)"

I have no idea how something can be similar to something else if I have never seen the first something before. This is all perfectly sensible and competent.

"pistols are pretty much anything under the handgun category in the game currently"

How many flavors of stupid are you? Thirty-one? Wait, that was ice cream. At least they have variety. What do you think a pistol is? A gun that fits in your hand? We have another word for that, a gun in your hand; I forget what it was. Maybe if I urinate in public I might remember.

"I actually thought of a more semi- auto gun. Automatic firing with more damage and range isn't exactly fair"

You mean a gun that shoots boolits without having to click for every single boolit? I wonder what that sounds li-Autoguns you idiot. You admit more damage and range is unfair? Guess what? Autoguns have less range but high damage. How buttocks squeezing great is that?

"blitz needle sprays the shots. I wanted a gun that could deal more dmg, have a longer range, and shoot semi- auto more accurately."

You want a gun that aims for you, deals high damage, has high range, and shoots for you all at once. No. No. You are not real. This is my imagination trying to make me homicidal. It finally decided it wanted to get out of this place in the chaos of me finding you and slapping your internal organs out of your face. That is what is going on here. I am going to go to the toilet, reach in with my head, and come out with a frilly orange hat. At least that makes more sense than this thread.

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 00:20
#4
Lightplasma's picture
Lightplasma
@ Luguiru

1. You talk about how every other person who suggested this said the same thing.
2.Later, you quote me on not knowing wether or not anyone else has made a similar thread.

I dont want a freaking autogun. I already have one of those.

your second to last comment: I said I wanted a semi auto gun. SEMI AUTO. Not shoots multiple shots for every time I click. Do you now what semi auto is? And autoguns have high dmg at a closer range. Long range, all the shots spread out and only one or 2 bullets hit. Thats about 25 dmg.

Just because it's more accurate doen't mean it aims for me. We have AA to supposedly do that.

autogun doesn't deal more damage; it shoots six bullets that deal less dmg.

No I have never used a blitz needel; Therefore I am completely unknowledgeable about them. How many weapons do you know about? How many have you used?

(My organization skills stink, so this is out of order)

"Rifles would potentially fire faster and further than a handgun"

You mean an Autogun.

"They are called handguns. Guns that you hold in your hands"

I don't mean a friggin autogun.

No, I don't.

I do want it to deal more dmg than an autogun. The dmg one bullet from it deals is 12. of course I want a 2* rifle to deal more dmg than that.

I would write more, but I have more important things to do. literally.

BTW, Luguiru, walking up to someone and telling them that their idea comepletly sucks is kind of rude.
And a FPS has to be first person. OMFG! I had no idea! Spiral knights wouldn't be as fun (in my opinion) If it was a first person game.

" I am going to go to the toilet, reach in with my head, and come out with a frilly orange hat." Good luck with that.

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 01:09
#5
Luguiru's picture
Luguiru

"I dont want a freaking autogun. I already have one of those.

You keep asking for features which Autoguns have. Do you ask for your sandwich to not have bread? Of course not, a sandwich with bread. Ridiculous.

"I said I wanted a semi auto gun. SEMI AUTO. Not shoots multiple shots for every time I click."

Do you know how our guns work? You have to reload when you use a full clip or the charge attack. There is no "oh I want to reload now so I can avoid doing it later". How about I ask for a bomb where I can do the charge part in a safe place for derpbillion bombs, then place them all at once when I go out in the fray?

"autoguns have high dmg at a closer range. Long range, all the shots spread out and only one or 2 bullets hit. Thats about 25 dmg.

Do you know how Autoguns work? You sacrifice range for higher damage. If you go closer to the target more bullets will hit them. That is what makes it balanced, or at least close to balanced. If you were experienced in this game you would be well aware Autoguns are the highest damage outputting weapons in competent hands.

"I do want it to deal more dmg than an autogun. The dmg one bullet from it deals is 12"

Look at this again. Do you see the damage table? Do I have to hold your hand on the way? Autogun at 2* is going to deal low damage because 2* is not a high star rating. Everything at 2* has low damage compared to higher ranks. Ranks work like that. Look at the peak damage. Can you read that for us? Compare it to any other 5* weapon. I dare you.

"I would write more, but I have more important things to do. literally.

Like what? Sleep? Play Call of Duty? Sleep while playing Call of Duty? Sleep with Call of Duty? None require intelligence.

"walking up to someone and telling them that their idea comepletly sucks is kind of rude"

Asking for new content almost identical to something that already exists and ignoring the responses about it is rude. Not searching with something as simple and obvious as Google when the built in search is stupid is rude when the rules specifically say to search before creating a thread. Calling our handguns pistols is rude. If I flipped off a nun while naked and riding a robot unicorn into outer space that would be rude.

"No I have never used a blitz needel; Therefore I am completely unknowledgeable about them. How many weapons do you know about? How many have you used?

For starters, I have both Blitz and VPepperbox. And have used them. I also happen to have and be competent with:

  • Cold Iron Vanquisher
  • Gran Faust
  • Divine Avenger
  • Combuster
  • Seerus hammers
  • Dread Venom Striker
  • Sudaruska
  • Winmillion
  • Final Flourish
  • Furious Flamberge
  • Barbarous Thorn Blade
  • Fang of Vog
  • Callahan
  • Biohazard
  • Polaris
  • Valiance
  • Storm Driver
  • Magma Driver
  • Argent Peacemaker
  • Sentenza
  • Ash of Agni
  • Shivermist Buster
  • Voltaic Tempest
  • Venom Veiler
  • Shocking Salt Bomb
  • Scintillating Sun Shards
  • Dark Briar Barrage
  • Dark Retribution
  • Nitronome
  • Big Angry Bomb
  • Graviton Vortex

Not convinced?

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 05:47
#6
Xxpapaya's picture
Xxpapaya
The papaya laughs his leaves off

@Luguiru
That's a lot of weapon/trinket slots you have ^^

@Luguiru & Lightplasma
This thread has mainly been an argument between you two :P Honestly, just calm down a bit, take a few deep breaths, eat a papaya. First of all, you are getting a bit piped(angry) up at just a simple debate. This is just about a weapon suggestion, not about why/why not we should remove the game. Or why/why not OOO and Sega should sell the game to another company.
As for Luguiru, I would appreciate it if you watch your language and who it is directed at a bit more.

"I wonder what that sounds li-Autoguns you idiot. You admit more damage and range is unfair? Guess what? Autoguns have less range but high damage. How buttocks squeezing great is that?"
Fine, the "buttocks squeezing" part cracked me up a bit ^^ But still, do watch your language please.

"Do I have to hold your hand on the way?"
I will follow you, follow you wherever you, may go ^^

""I would write more, but I have more important things to do. literally.

Like what? Sleep? Play Call of Duty? Sleep while playing Call of Duty? Sleep with Call of Duty? None require intelligence."
Yes it does, playing call of duty requires the knowledge of knowing how to open the application from your desktop :P While sleeping requires the knowledge of knowing how to get onto bed, lie down, close your eyes, and..........sleep ^^

Ok, enough quoting. Basically, just calm down a little, both of you =) Close your eyes, take a few breaths, eat a papaya, or sing this
--> www.youtube.com.sg/watch?v=dw2VX5wQYQg =)

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 13:32
#7
Lezlyblaze's picture
Lezlyblaze
!!!!

People still don't grasp how important the shield is. Ugh!

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 14:08
#8
Grittle's picture
Grittle
Ill just leave this

Ill just leave this here:

http://memegenerator.net/instance/31702688

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 14:13
#9
Lezlyblaze's picture
Lezlyblaze
o_O

awww thats sad bro -1

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 14:42
#10
Canine-Vladmir's picture
Canine-Vladmir

I like reading Luguiri's posts.

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 17:06
#11
Pawsmack's picture
Pawsmack
@OP/Lightplasma

Luguiru just destroyed your thread. Honestly I'll help him clean it up too. ._. I myself have used every 5* weapon in the game. And you obviously have little knowledge on any of them. No weapon in the game can out damage Blitz Needle. Only weapons that have actually gotten close to out-damaging it is the Warmaster Rocket Hammer, Plague Needle, and Volcanic Pepperbox. Blitz Needle would out-damage any rifle idea of yours. Anyway lets get to the point of a rifle. Why? Just why? Elicit out the fact that so many people hate ideas where you cannot have your shield equipped just for the sake of weaponry. Spiral Knights isn't Call of Duty. Honestly if you have any sense of decency you will move this thread to the Graveyard because much more abhorrence is soon to come...

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 20:05
#12
Psychodestroyer's picture
Psychodestroyer

"if you have any sense of decency you will move this thread to the Graveyard because much more abhorrence is soon to come..."

If you were referring to me, Paw...

...

Hi :3

Such a 'rifle' would outclass the Antigua-line in every way, should it be implemented. It'd fire further than it, faster than it, have more shots than it, and even if it did less damage per shot, would outdamage it because of the effect produced by the range, firerate and whatever power it has.

I choose to compare it to the Antigua because according to your descriptions, the first thing that pops into my mind is the Antigua being overshadowed.

I've given it thought, and although I'm not great at weapon balancing, if I can't find even a snowball's chance in Firestorm, there probably isn't one.

I can't find one.

I'll refrain from saying other reasons I don't like this suggestion, but trust me, there are a lot.

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 23:12
#13
Doctorspacebar's picture
Doctorspacebar

POO TIS POW!

...Ahem. Now, Lug, there's no need to call him an idiot. He's probably new to the game, or at least new to the Suggestions forum.

Right, so, Rifles. Basically, you're asking to sacrifice a shield (defense) for a mobile, rapid-fire gun (mobility, decent damage). Two-handed weapons of any sort have been shot down countless times due to the fact that the Shield is such an integral part of gameplay. So no zweihanders, no miniguns, no assault rifles, and, sadly, no giant Knight-sized 40-space-radius giga-nukes either. (I'd PAY to get a giant Knight-sized giga-nuke, but that's beside the point.)

However, a gun that lowers your health or weakens status resistance, in exchange for better damage and mobility, could be a workable idea. Then again, you can switch weapons in this game... perhaps a gun that has to be loaded before use, X bullets at a time, painstakingly slow, but can unload it all in one massive storm? Good for the patient knight, but does it really accomplish the original goal? If the goal is rapid-fire while looking fairly like an assault rifle, of course it can accomplish the original goal.

...am I getting off topic? Maybe. Either way, it's 1:11 over here and I'm too tired to continue pondering this post. All of you play nice while I'm sleeping.

Tue, 12/11/2012 - 23:51
#14
Namealready's picture
Namealready
Hmmmm...

@ Doctorspacebar

Nice Idea. Well I think it should be this way. The shield stays, but it can only block attacks from the front. The person can pivot, but cannot move, so your actually in an aiming stance. The rifle then is able to shoot long distances, so the camera is able to move where your mouse is when in aiming stance. The rifle cannot shot while its not aimed down. To charge, it will still be the same charge time with pistols, but you still need to keep it aimed down. When fully charged, the bullet pierces through multiple enemies, able to hit up to 3 times before it disappears. Gives huge knockback too.

I like the idea of rifles actually, but how Lightplasma described it isn't good enough. If someone, or Lightplasma again, can make a detailed description of rifles, then I'd support it. This thread, however, does not interest me enough to support it.

Wed, 12/12/2012 - 00:46
#15
Toxicblade's picture
Toxicblade
Derp

One of the main reasons people hate the rifle is because of no shield. How do fix?

I know! Couldn't we take the shield away with the rifle equipped but when you press the button that you have assigned your shield to, your knight could do a hit with the butt of the rifle, which could function like a shield bump. With your rifle out, you wouldn't need to shield cancel because you would just let go of the attack button.

And Doctorspacebar, why is heavy here shooting us with his fist?

Also, while I'm thinking about TF2, Need a dispensa heeyah.

Wed, 12/12/2012 - 01:19
#16
Tuhui's picture
Tuhui
...

@Toxicblade, it would still not fix the problem of having no shield, are you gonna bump 5 things away with your butt?

If were on the subject of weapons with shields, why not mortars? Since it comes with shield no lockdown, it would be like current mortar shots except slower and smaller and the charge attack would be a little bit bigger, with med speed decrease?................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................................

Wed, 12/12/2012 - 01:58
#17
Severage's picture
Severage
...

are you gonna bump 5 things away with your butt?

lol...Depends how obese you are.

~Sev

Wed, 12/12/2012 - 02:26
#18
Melisan's picture
Melisan
@Luguiru: HA, HA

@Luguiru: HA, HA boolits...there is nothing more to add to this thread

Wed, 12/12/2012 - 15:30
#19
Pawsmack's picture
Pawsmack
@Psy

@Psy

Oh you said it in the past. I thought it sounded familiar. ._.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system