Challenge dovis for #1 eu spot
2014 Official LD Rankings ---Closed---
Also scirio says that he challenges zain when I beat him(his words not mine)
Udpated.
That 1v1 isn't valid, read the rules before doing anything.
Me vs Murderhaze
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5SbEWhS2a4
I challenge Rosetta
Me and bulls 1v1 will be no later than 1-3days. Having issues with my computer. I apologize.
Scirio challenges Murderhaze on the USA ranking
Zainj 4 - 5 Tempas
Zainj 5 - 2 Scirio
Theirillusion 5 - 2 Muffin-Top
Theirillusion 5 - 1 Scirio
Murderhaze 5 - 4 Scirio
Murderhaze 1 - 5 Muffin-Top
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6u043P5-8s me vs muffin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn_CB8VHkXk me vs scirio
challenging Rosetta on US challenging Maxx power on EU
update: my name is back to bull pig and my guild is twenty one
i challenge dummiez
dummiez has been offline since 8/5/14
so do i autowin ('o ' )
Yo, so apparently bley was #1 in the wins/losses ratio but was not. So since he's not #1 is another person going to get the prize ?
It was wins-loses, not wins/losses. If it were wins/losses someone with 1 win and 0 losses would have got the prize.
You got 5 points too, but after Bley did and with more games played. I already talked with Feller about this at the end of the year and he said that since Bley deleted his account nobody was gonna get the prize.
wins - loses okay. If you take the full ratios in the pdf file in the link. The limit of 2 games ratios are 6/3 and 6/2. So the wins - loses is 3 and 4(mine being the latter). Also, bley did so with less games played ? Are you blind ? Bley played 11 games and I played 9.
edit : also the whole "after" bley did it is a stupid reason. Some of my 1v1s were delayed by weeks/months due to you not wanting to judge them or favouring people and letting them not play for weeks on end(tpmuser was offline for weeks before he played me).
I wanted to say that Bley played more games, it was a mistake. And the limit of 2 times vs the same player is for the other prize, the one in which you have to beat the #2 5 times.
In my pdf there's a picture of the old code for this forum node which says that the limit of 2 is clearly for the end of year prize(which makes sense since if there was a limit of 2 games and you had to do 5 against the 2nd how could you possibly win the monthly prize?)
Typos aren't sentences which are misplaced in different paragraphs. Also if the 2nd doesn't change, how is the 1st supposed to win the prize ?
I left the rankings on november, much time before the end of the year. That makes noobis the winner, my score doesn't matter.
Like bley said, he left on november meaning he DOESN'T want to be part of this anymore. In fact since he did leave his score is irrelevant just as he stated since he's not part of this competition anymore.
Also we all know the 2nd player will sooner quit than be replaced.
"And the player with the best wins/loses/matches in the top10 (with all the matches in videos) ratio will get 1m at the end of the year, but with a limit of 2 games against the same opponent"
Seriously Contri, you did very clearly specify that it was about the ratio. You said so **twice** in the same sentence, the first time when using slashes as opposed to minuses, and the second time when y'know, you said it was a ratio. I can understand if one of those had been a typo, but I have a hard time thinking you made that mistake twice. As for the limit of 2 games per opponent, it's quite clearly in the very same sentence. The use of the word "but" kind of implies it relates to what has just been stated as well, wouldn't you say?
I'm starting to think Contri doesn't actually write his posts. Maybe he just bashes his head on his keyboard and does his best to cut and paste together something comprehensible which will innevitably be misunderstood a couple of months later when he doesn't wanna pay up or let someone advance in his competition.
@Bob:
That was a mistake, and the prizes thing wasn't my idea so i didn't write it myself and I may misunderstood something. I'll talk with Feller about this, I don't pay so I don't lose anything.
Rules updated in order to make the rankings more "skillfull".
We are looking for more players.
Well, so Feller will pay Noobis the prize tomorro. It's nice to see that some people can play well without AT while others can't do anything else than posting screenshoots to brag on the forums and aren'tg able to break a single record (http://forums.spiralknights.com/en/node/94143) without a computer helping them to aim,
Our benefactor said:
Ok, first of all I want to congratz all the people who participate in all our events (Tourneys, rankings, records). It was a GREAT year for NO-AIMBOT Gaming, and believe me, I've been trying hard to see this acomplished.
Since OOO don't care about our small but strong community, Contri and I, were been using our time and money to create competitive lockdown. I hope you all continue participating with us.
Contratz to Bing Bong for being the fourth champ of our REAL LD tournament, and Drjovis / Bleyken, for putting so much effort recording and proving that no ATGaming is possible, and we don't need THAT MUCH help like Nick the developer describe AT in the beggining
Winner of 2014 Official Rankings:
Drdovis/Tempas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkNl47XWs24&feature=youtu.be
Sweetsu vs Tempas with commentary (the one that didn't count I guess).
I challenge bull-Xz.